On Tuesday 21 June 2011 15:56:10 Rene Mayorga wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> The current maintainer of arp-scan, Tim Brown ,
> is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
>
> Maintaining a package requires time and skills. P
ap folk to get something both we and they=
=20
feel comfortable with. I can probably dig out some references from our and=
=20
their mailing lists too if necessary.
Tim
=2D-=20
Tim Brown
<mailto:t...@65535.com>
--nextPart2958378.qgascxSZ95
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=si
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openvas-client
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : OpenVAS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.openvas.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
ces - the lists are generated from crawling the net,
so are based on real file/directory names used by developers
* Auditing dynamic applications where URLs don't necessarily map on to files
* Auditing web server ACLs
* Load testing - it can produce up to 6000 requests/second
I'd also poi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dirbuster
Version : 0.9.7
Upstream Author : James Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/dirbuster/
* License : LGPL
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: arp-scan
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Roy Hills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nta-monitor.com/tools/arp-scan/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
On Monday 12 March 2007 18:25, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10956 March 1977, Tim Brown wrote:
> > Why package it? Other than the practical uses outlined above, because
> > having binaries on a system outside of the package management system is a
> > PITA to keep track of
k or so).
Personally, I am English. Through my day job, I have clarification regarding
changes to UK law that might affect this tool and we have had assurances that
legitimate security researchers and the tools they develop will not be
targetted here in the UK.
Tim
--
Tim Brown
<m
"john")?
John actually requires you have access to the hashed / encrypted passwords.
Since sucrack drives a console tool (by default su) it can be used in places
where John can't - for example auditing SSH key phrases, or where the
penetration tester is attempting to escalate privile
On Monday 12 March 2007 16:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Montag 12 März 2007 12:30 schrieb Tim Brown:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: sucrack
> > Version : 1.1
&
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:02, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 12, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sucrack is a multithreaded Linux/UNIX tool for cracking local user
> > accounts via wordlist bruteforcing su
>
> What is the point of packaging this?
I'
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:57, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 12, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm packaging a bunch of security tools that I use in my job pen testing.
>
> I do not understand how you would use such a tool in packaged form.
> If you ca
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sucrack
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
13 matches
Mail list logo
