Thomas wrote:
> Where are you proposing we place that hyperlink?
I just recieved word that the program appears to be a non-graphical one
and as such, the placement of the hyperlink is indeed a problem, the
burden of solving which I'd prefer to place on the copyright holder.
Conclusively, an inq
Thomas wrote:
> The non-free archive contains hyperlinks, and the license requires
> that those hyperlinks include the image.
The license require no such thing.
What it does require is that the image is displayed, hyperlinked (i.e.
placed within hyperlink tags) to the specific page.
It's a very
> You're right, but it still seems to prohibit any kind of distribution
> which is not by hyperlinks that include their logo.
I agree that it doesn't make any actual difference with regard to
freeness; I was just refuting Brandens insinuation of ignorance on behalf
of the license writer.
> Tha
> > > # Also, the official Wpoison logo itself must be include in an
> HTML
> > > # hyperlink so that any usser clicking on any part of the logo
> image
> > > # will be directed/linked to the Wpoison home page at:
> >
> > Please keep CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden wrote:
> The lic
4 matches
Mail list logo
