Bug#550817: RFP ...

2010-03-27 Thread Sitaram Chamarty
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:34:01PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > retitle 550817 RFP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis > thanks > > I don't want to be considered to be the blocking bit here so I rather > turn this into an RFP. There are various reasons why I didn't provide a >

Bug#550817: gitolite changes to make it easier for distro packagers

2010-02-13 Thread Sitaram Chamarty
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote: > Hi Rhonda, Martin (and any others), > > Could you please take a look at the new "dps" branch of gitolite on > github when you get a chance?  The latest commit is > http://github.com

Bug#550817: gitolite changes to make it easier for distro packagers

2010-02-10 Thread Sitaram Chamarty
Hi Rhonda, Martin (and any others), Could you please take a look at the new "dps" branch of gitolite on github when you get a chance? The latest commit is http://github.com/sitaramc/gitolite/commit/1ecdd4618e58c03dd7aea39bab34f3244d0135f7 and it's basically my attempt to make it easier for packag

Bug#550817: thoughts on a gitolite Debian package

2010-02-03 Thread Sitaram Chamarty
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:38:49AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > If the user ran easy-install, then the source files are likely to > live on a separate machine, outside of our control. The user may not > be aware of that fact (at least not consciously), and might not know > that s/he is expected

Bug#550817: ITP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis

2009-10-13 Thread Sitaram Chamarty
itories. Gitolite goes further than gitosis. Its primary target is corporate environments where the ability to restrict who can push to what branch is also important. Over the past few weeks it has grown a bit beyond that primary reason, and acquired several other neat features described in