Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: phil...@marek.priv.at
* Package name: filius
Version : 1.11.0
Upstream Author : University Siegen, Germany
* URL : https://gitlab.com/filius1/filius
* License : GPL2, GPL3
Programming Lang: Java
Description
For the convenience of others in this thread:
I took Arch's package ([1], via [2], extracted it in /opt, and put a
symlink in /usr/local/bin. Works fine with openjdk-11-jre-headless.
(Perhaps something similar could be done to re-start the Java dependency
loop referenced in the blocking bug[3]?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: truepolyglot
Version : 1.6.2
Upstream Author : Ben
* URL : https://truepolyglot.hackade.org/
* License : Unlicense
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Create combined ZIP/PDF files.
Truepolyglot is po
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: scrcpy
Version : 1.8
Upstream Author : Romain Vimont, see https://github.com/rom1v
* URL : https://github.com/Genymobile/scrcpy
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Mirror your Android
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ghidra
Version : ?
Upstream Author : NSA
* URL : https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Ghidra is a software reverse engineering (SRE) fr
Now they've even released a 0.1.0!! ;)
> > Any news on that?
>
> List is shorter, but still not done yet. :)
>
> > Not trying to spam you, but my alarm to ask just went off again... ;)
>
> No worries. Reminders are good.
ping :|
Hi James,
> > > While I understand the value of being able to test a build, I'd like
> > > discuss the (IMO positive) value of having an untested binary package in
> > > experimental, as compared to having no package.
> >
> > Agreed. Just trying to clear a few other things off my list before
>
> > While I understand the value of being able to test a build, I'd like
> > discuss the (IMO positive) value of having an untested binary package in
> > experimental, as compared to having no package.
>
> Agreed. Just trying to clear a few other things off my list before
> getting to this.
Than
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752264 says
Fix blocked by 783044:
ITP: busted -- Lua unit testing framework focused on ease of use
While I understand the value of being able to test a build, I'd like
discuss the (IMO positive) value of having an untested binary package
Hello everybody,
I've released a new version of FSVS.
Changes since 1.2.3 are
* Compilation fixes for MacOS 10.6; thanks, Thomas!
* Added "password" option, as sent by Mark. Thank you!
* Workarounds for gcc-4.5 and gcc-4.6 regressions. Thank you, Brian!
* Compatibility with autoconf 2.68.
On Sunday 09 December 2007 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Sunday 09 December 2007 21:39:01 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > > The debian/changelog can then also be reduced... Ah btw, what was
> > > the technical reason to run autoconf?
> >
> > I was about to say "I don't remember, it was so long ago" and then
>
On Sunday 09 December 2007 Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Debian releases won't coincide exactly with upstream releases.
...
The only thing I'd ask for would be to take the current version, and the
changed description (no longer "aims for" ... "it is", I decided :-) before
uploading that in main.
On Sunday 09 December 2007 Matthew Johnson wrote:
> However, we would certainly like to work closely with you as upstream.
> Sheldon is the maintainer, so it's up to him where he keeps the debian
> packaging, if he'd like to keep it in your VCS so you can both work in
> it, that's absolutely fine,
On Sunday 09 December 2007 Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Hi, I noticed your RFS and would be happy to sponsor the package. It
> looks in pretty good shape, I'm just trying it out here.
>
> How much do you use it? had any problems? (I have an ulterior motive,
> I'm wondering about using it in a productio
15 matches
Mail list logo
