Damyan Ivanov wrote:
There may be some licensing problems and this is why I CC debian-legal.
All the sources are licensed under GPL-2+, except one file,
include/firmware.h, which is generated from a binary blob and contains
the following notice:
[snip]
Looks bad to me.
I did not yet check if
A year has passed since this was opened.
People find Anyterm difficult to compile from source, because of the
dependencies on Apache, Boost and Rote. See the Anyterm forum for unending
discussions. A binary package would make life easier for these people. Is it
going to happen?
Phil.
--
Including a
custom version of ROTE with anyterm would probably cause the package to
be rejected.
..
Have you considered forking ROTE
So do you think that forking a custom version is good or bad?
As I said this may become an issue if / when I need to make further
changes. For the time bein
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
# From version 0.11, Anyerm needs to access data in an internal
# ROTE data structure. To do so it needs to find the roteprivate.h
# header file, which is in the rote source directory. Please adjust
# the following line to specify the directory in which this file can
#
just "apt-get install" it, they miss that. I am really hoping that
someone who has some experience with security auditing, preferably in
connection with Apache, will take an interest.
Regards,
Phil Endecott.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
5 matches
Mail list logo
