> Just wanted to ask for some reasons,.. as I see some ubuntufication of
> Debian ;)
Well, we have to make sure that there are no ubuntufications there. The Debian
reasons are that the ubuntu-dev-tools contains some scripts/apps that are
useful with sbuild tool (like bootstrapping, lvm images
Hm, I agree that the "22" in the utils package is unnecessary. I'll try
> to remove it.
Hmm, AFAIK the utils package replaces the old 13 examples, and the binaries
there are linked to the SO 22 and not 13. So, you could replace the 13
examples.
Cheers,
Peter
--
Peter Antoniac, PhD
ht
Package: wnpp
Severity: urgent
Owner: Peter Antoniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As the maintainer for libdc1394 didn't answer for many months, we
(developers of libdc1394) would like to get involved also with maintaining
the package. Moreover, the maintainer didn't follow our recommandat
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
It seems to me that the libdc1394 package is not maintained. The developers
from libdc1394 would like that we can aid debian with the package
maintaining for this package. There is also the new API release. We are now
doing the packaging using the Ubuntu PPA and you
4 matches
Mail list logo