Bug#542789: why do we need this

2009-10-14 Thread Peter Antoniac
> Just wanted to ask for some reasons,.. as I see some ubuntufication of > Debian ;) Well, we have to make sure that there are no ubuntufications there. The Debian reasons are that the ubuntu-dev-tools contains some scripts/apps that are useful with sbuild tool (like bootstrapping, lvm images

Bug#461583: ITP: libdc1394-22

2008-01-26 Thread Peter Antoniac
Hm, I agree that the "22" in the utils package is unnecessary. I'll try > to remove it. Hmm, AFAIK the utils package replaces the old 13 examples, and the binaries there are linked to the SO 22 and not 13. So, you could replace the 13 examples. Cheers, Peter -- Peter Antoniac, PhD ht

Bug#461583: ITP: libdc1394v2 -- As the maintainer for libdc1394 didn't answer for many months, we (developers of libdc1394) would like to get involved also with maintaining the package.

2008-01-19 Thread Peter Antoniac
Package: wnpp Severity: urgent Owner: Peter Antoniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As the maintainer for libdc1394 didn't answer for many months, we (developers of libdc1394) would like to get involved also with maintaining the package. Moreover, the maintainer didn't follow our recommandat

Bug#461446: O: libdc1394-13

2008-01-18 Thread Peter Antoniac
Package: wnpp Severity: normal It seems to me that the libdc1394 package is not maintained. The developers from libdc1394 would like that we can aid debian with the package maintaining for this package. There is also the new API release. We are now doing the packaging using the Ubuntu PPA and you