Bug#1095421: O: rcs -- The GNU Revision Control System

2025-02-09 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2025-02-09 12:59, W. Kosior wrote: A quick glance at the archives of one of RCS mailing lists shows that at least Paul is still active [1]. [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-rcs/ Yes, I've been committing fixes, most recently a couple of months ago. See: https://git.savannah.gnu.o

Bug#272867: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib / m4

2004-10-07 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But since *.m4 files are often copied from one module to another, Isn't this much like saying source code is often copied from one *.c file to another? The FSF can do this, even if the code movement crosses the LGPL/GPL boundary, since the FSF has the c

Bug#272867: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib

2004-10-07 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't want it to give it away in public domain; instead I've added > the GPL copyright notice to it now. Since the module description says > LGPL, it effectively means the file is under LGPL. Thanks. That sounds quite reasonable to me. (Like I said,

Bug#272867: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib

2004-10-06 Thread Paul Eggert
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know how does copyright law apply to auto-generated programs. Maybe > debian-legal can offer advice on this. The answer is "it depends", so let me give a few more details about the file in question, so that debian-legal knows what we're talking

Bug#272867: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib

2004-10-06 Thread Paul Eggert
y adding a proper copyright notice. Also, I see that gnulib has departed from the glibc code in some cases where it doesn't need to (and this arguably could introduce a bug). So I installed the following patch to fix both problems. 2004-10-06 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#272867: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib

2004-10-06 Thread Paul Eggert
To fix diacrit.h and diacrit.c I installed the obvious patch: 2004-10-06 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * diacrit.c, diacrit.h: Add GPL notice. Index: diacrit.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/gnulib/gnulib/lib/diacr

Bug#272867: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib / m4

2004-10-05 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some m4 files are shared between GPLed and LGPLed packages, Yes, and for these files the more-permissive license makes sense. > and it is frequent to copy m4 macros from one file to another (much > more frequent than copying source code between .c files

Bug#272867: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib

2004-10-02 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For the m4 files, I propose to add the standard notice to them: > > dnl Copyright (C) YEARS Free Software Foundation, Inc. > dnl This file is free software, distributed under the terms of the GNU > dnl General Public License. As a special exception to th