Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NoisyCoil
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, noisyc...@tutanota.com
* Package name: triforce-lv2
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Contact: James Calligeros
* URL : https://github.com/chadmed/triforce
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #1018258
X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com
Control: retitle -1 ITP: procs -- modern replacement for ps
Control: owner -1 noisyc...@tutanota.com
Hello,
I would like to work on this.
Best.
Hi Alex,
> I'm not sure that is really our policy? We package multiple binaries
> for packages that have them.
>From the "Packaging binaries" section in debcargo-conf's `rust_hacks.md`:
> If a package ships a binary but you only want to use it as library add this
> stanza in debcargo.toml:
>
>
> If you never offered to maintain resvg then how did this conversation
> emerge? Did I try to bend your words, when all you initially said was
> "whoops" and informing me that it was a bleep on the radar soon gone?
> If that's the case then I apologize for the confusion I have caused:
> Please sim
Jonas, you must have missed one piece of my first email, which I report below:
> Jonas, I apologize for the duplicated work. Since you've been working on this
> for a long time I am more than willing to step down from {u,re}svg once the
> sources are rejected. I am no user of resvg and I am not in
take over all of it, not only the library parts.
I pushed the changes to debcargo-conf's current packaging of usvg/resvg needed
to build the binaries to my personal repo:
https://salsa.debian.org/NoisyCoil/debcargo-conf/-/commits/usvg-resvg. As far
as the binaries are concerned, packagin
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #1056068
X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com, eam...@yaerobi.com,
debian-r...@lists.debian.org, n...@debian.org
For the record, `cargo debstatus` now lists both usvg and resvg as being in
NEW, but were it not for NEW they would be listed as absent. In fact, readin
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #1056068
X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com, eam...@yaerobi.com,
debian-r...@lists.debian.org, n...@debian.org
Hi all,
While working on ITP #948483 I repackaged usvg and resvg v0.42 as dependencies
of broot, without knowing they were already being built by src:r
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #948483
X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com, eam...@yaerobi.com
Hi eamanu,
Do you mind if I claim ownership of this ITP?
Cheers,
NC
t; I've actually already completed the packaging (>
> https://salsa.debian.org/NoisyCoil/debcargo-conf/-/commits/package-dysk> ),
> didn't open the MR yet though. I'll be quite busy during the next few days,
> so I don't know if I'll be able to submit it before
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NoisyCoil
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, noisyc...@tutanota.com
* Package name: dysk
Version : 2.9.0
Upstream Contact: Denys Séguret
* URL : https://github.com/Canop/dysk
* License : MIT
Programming Lang
11 matches
Mail list logo
