Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Mestnik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: beautify-bash
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Paul Lutus , Shriram V
* URL : https://arachnoid.com/python/beautify_bash_program.html
https
Looks like -rpath is set no matter what for GNU/default host_os,
./configure line 7548. We may need to patch this.
mowgli is configured as "internal" starting at/around line 10824. To
solve this it just needs to find and be happy with the output of
pkg-config. I'm guessing that having version 2
The atheme source doesn't include exactly libmowgli-2.0.0, instead it's
f4867ef73383f727d264c7d27c31e550c59a406d. The changes are limited to
these files buildsys.mk.in and src/libmowgli/Makefile.
This command will spit out four patches that account for the changes, if
you have a git clone of libm
On 03/24/12 15:24, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Hello,
> I've recently started to package atheme-services and I was wondering
> if I could get some input from you.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/atheme-services
>
> I do plan on making an updated release, perhaps by some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/12 18:56, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:19:28 -0500, Mike Mestnik
wrote:
>> Thank you for the patch and I approve the change.
>
> Awesome.
>
>> I'm struggling with the init file in regard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/12 18:00, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I would rather get the package into shape and into unstable first, to be
> honest.
>
> Besides, there are more urgent issues to resolve with the current
> package.
>
> According to our tests, there are is on
On 03/25/12 12:08, micah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would be great if you could add the hardening-flags to the
> atheme-services package, as described here:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough
Try it now. There are two problems.
1. I couldn't get hardening=+all to build, but the other option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/21/12 11:11, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:17:25 -0500, Mike Mestnik
wrote:
>> Too much drama. Some users are familiar with Atheme's stance on
>> packaging, so you'll be asked to not package Atheme
On 03/20/12 17:01, micah anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:35:31 -0500, Mike Mestnik
> wrote:
>> http://mikemestnik.net/debian/atheme-services/
>>
>> Fully usable package, needs mentor and upstream permission.
The current state of the pkg needs a licensee review.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://mikemestnik.net/debian/atheme-services/
Fully usable package, needs mentor and upstream permission.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAG
On 03/18/12 12:28, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Here is a ?partially? working .git tree containing a debian pkg for
> atheme-services_6.0.9.
>
> The atheme channel users were not nice to me so I want nothing more to
> do with them or there code. However I put some of my time into making
Here is a ?partially? working .git tree containing a debian pkg for
atheme-services_6.0.9.
The atheme channel users were not nice to me so I want nothing more to
do with them or there code. However I put some of my time into making
this pkg and I'd like to see it make some one else happy.
I'll a
Perhaps this is just a bug on this site:
http://www.deb.at/devel/wnpp/prospective
However is lists libev-perl as being 889 days in preparation, instead of
under Requested packages.
I'd like to see debs for this regardless of potential copyright violations.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
13 matches
Mail list logo
