On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 02:35:59AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think you can do something like:
[...]
# postinst time: use link & rename to replace working version atomically.
It's technically possible, but AFAICT a policy violation.
Mike Stone
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 02:18:51AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 18, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Some day it may replace crypt(3), currently provided by glibc:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_glibc_libcrypt_with_libxcrypt
I tried creating a package which would divert libc's libcrypt
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:47:02AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 20, Philipp Kern wrote:
I think it's odd to say "here, I'm packaging up a replacement for your
library, but I'm not going to coordinate with you" when we are preparing
a (somewhat) coherent distribution, so I don't think that
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 03:14:20PM +0200, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
It writes to `/dev/shm` which is not disk.
All else that's been said aside, this idea is also dangerously incorrect
in a typical configuration: the tmpfs backend will write to swap under
memory pressure. (This is also true of the
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:26:06PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:21:10PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:05:30AM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> despite fears of OpenBSD only caring about themselves, I have found that
> it is easier to c
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:05:30AM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
despite fears of OpenBSD only caring about themselves, I have found that
it is easier to compile LibreSSL for various platforms (even non-POSIX
ones) than OpenSSL. And that APIs might be broken more easily by LibreSSL
is ridiculous, as
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:29:09PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Out of all of these, I think the option that I think has the fewest
downsides overall is to convince people to package LibreSSL, but I'm not
myself in a position to contribute to that effort.
Does anyone have thoughts or other options
Thanks, Luke!
On 8/26/09, Luke Faraone wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Luke Faraone
>
> * Package name: rainbow
> Version : 0.8.4
> Upstream Author : Michael Stone
> * URL : http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Rainbow
> * Lic
I believe that this library is already available as
liblua5.1-posix1
liblua5.1-posix-dev
from source lua-posix.
Can you confirm or deny this belief?
Regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
If this is packaged the description should make clear that the program
implements only a subset of the NTP protocol at this time.
Mike Stone
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:03:19AM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote:
* Package name: libapache-mod-throttle
How does this differ from the mod_throttle already packaged with apache?
Mike Stone
I propose that we remove this package. There's no source code, upstream
has disappeared, and ethereal is a free package that provides pretty
much the same functionality but better (or at least that's my
impression). Any comments?
kill it.
Mike Stone
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 06:21:49AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
>posh is a stripped-down version of pdksh
Why? What on earth is there to strip out of pdksh?
--
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 06:19:05PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> ifstat is a tool to report network interfaces bandwith just like
> vmstat/iostat do for other system counters. ifstat gathers these
> statistics from the kernel internal counters, which is highly operating
> system dep
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:12:16PM +0100, you wrote:
> Pure-FTPd is a fast, production-quality, standards-conformant FTP
> server based upon Troll-FTPd. Unlike other popular FTP servers, it has
> no known security flaws, is trivial to set up and is especially
> designed for modern Linux kernels
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I originally adopted this package because I didn't want to see it lost.
Don't make the same mistake--please pick it up *only* if you plan to put
a lot of time into it. There are some fairly major problems with the
source as it exists, and the package should probably
16 matches
Mail list logo
