On May 27, Léo Haf wrote:
Bitcoin Knots is a Bitcoin node that lets users be fully sovereign with
their money.
Can you avoid the propaganda in the description please?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mar 10, Roland Mas wrote:
> The only real caveat is that it doesn't pull user entries from other
> sources like PAM or LDAP since it only operates by reading the file on
> disk.
This is why this library is broken and programs should not use it.
It is not just about LDAP, but also things lik
On Dec 18, Shengqi Chen wrote:
> Currently Debian already has bird and bird2. bird3 is now released,
> presumably to be packaged separately with previous versions.
Yes, but I expect that the bird2 maintainer will package bird3 since he
works for the same organization.
--
ciao,
Marco
signatur
On Oct 05, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I would like that 'apt install signify' install OpenBSD's signify (from
> the Debian 'signify-openbsd' package) and not the 2003 mail-related
> signify perl script from the Debian 'signify' source package.
Agreed: the current signify package is a niche tool mai
On Sep 02, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Based on publically available [information], my previous and recent
> interactions with upstream this happend more due to personal
> differences with upstream than for technical reasons and I hope to be
> able to rebuild that damaged bridge.
Based on my own perso
On Dec 31, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Upstream Contact: YunQiang Su
> * URL : https://github.com/wzssyqa/cryptsetup-2fa/
What are the benefits of this compared to systemd-cryptenroll?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sbctl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Contact: Morten Linderud
* URL : https://github.com/Foxboron/sbctl/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Secure Boot Manager
sbctl is a user-friendly secure bo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco d'Itri
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: mkosi-initrd
Version : 0
Upstream Contact: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
* URL : https://github.com/systemd/mkosi-initrd
* License :
On Jun 30, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
> As far as I understand it, the main point of BabaSSL is to add support
> for Chinese developed ciphers and algorithms.
Is supporting Chinese cryptography standards a goal for Debian?
If it is then they should be available to all packages, but if it is not
t
On Jun 22, Lance Lin wrote:
> Yes, from my understanding it is a "drop in" replacement for OpenSSL. One of
> my packages (Workflow) uses it but can also use OpenSSL.
>
> I think this package will be beneficial to the Workflow users and downstream
> OS's.
Can you explain exactly what benefits
On Jun 17, Lance Lin wrote:
> - BabaSSL is a modern cryptographic and secure protocol library
> developed by the amazing people in Alibaba Digital Economy.
What is the plan? Are there any current or new packages which will
depend on it?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Feb 22, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> For servers, the ideal situation is somewhat less clear, but there was
> at least some interest in using systemd-networkd (with or without
> netplan).
Why even consider netplan, I wonder?
> So we may not need to specifically promote a DHCP client like dhcpcd5 t
On Feb 07, Yadd wrote:
> Bash is great, but when it comes to writing scripts,
> people usually choose a more convenient programming language.
[citation needed]
> JavaScript is a perfect choice,
This is a quite peculiar opinion.
Maybe you want to adopt a more neutral tone for the package descrip
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 src:ladvd
I intend to orphan the ladvd package.
I do not care for it anymore because, when systemd-networkd is not
enough, then I think that lldpd is generally better.
The package description is:
ladvd sends link layer advertisements on all a
On Jun 28, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> ifenslave used to be a standalone binary that sent ioctls to the kernel,
> but nowadays bonding can be configured via the "ip" command from the
> iproute2 package, and by writing to the /sys/ tree. The package no
> longer contains the standalone binary, but just p
On Apr 26, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> It is a fork of bgpq3.
I appreciate the ITP, but is there any point now in keeping bgpq3
around?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Dec 30, Marco d'Itri via RPKI wrote:
> > Building a real package will still require a few more crates to be
> Right now I am stuck on rpki depending on a very old version of ring.
> The verification API has changed since then and I do not know enough
> Rust to upd
On Feb 06, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> URL: https://github.com/cloudflare/boringtun
> Description: userspace WireGuard implementation in Rust
What is the purpose of having this packaged in Debian? It is at most
a proof of concept, with hardly any improvements since it has been
relea
On Jan 02, Marco d'Itri via RPKI wrote:
> I have packaged all missing dependencies: at this point the only blocker
> is ring and possibly other not up to date dependencies (I have not
> checked all of them).
bcder is a problem too, since now it is uninstallable:
https://bugs.debi
On Jan 02, Martin Hoffmann wrote:
> > > Building a real package will still require a few more crates to be
> I think you can just ask the Debian Rust team to include them or
> somesuch?
I have packaged all missing dependencies: at this point the only blocker
is ring and possibly other not up to
On Dec 29, Marco d'Itri via RPKI wrote:
> Building a real package will still require a few more crates to be
Right now I am stuck on rpki depending on a very old version of ring.
The verification API has changed since then and I do not know enough
Rust to update rpki.
--
cia
Updated Debian packaging is available in the git repository:
https://salsa.debian.org/md/routinator/ .
Building a real package will still require a few more crates to be
packaged in Debian:
├── daemonize v0.4.1
│ ├── boxfnonce v0.1.1
├── listenfd v0.3.3
├── *
│ └── once_cell v1.2.0
├── unwr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco d'Itri
* Package name: fort-validator
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : NIC MX and LACNIC
* URL : https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : An RPKI Vali
A first attempt at packaging is available in
https://salsa.debian.org/md/routinator/ .
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco d'Itri
* Package name: routinator
Version : 0.3.3
Upstream Author : NLnet Labs
* URL : https://nlnetlabs.nl/rpki
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Rust
Description : An RPKI Validator
The Routinator
On Aug 13, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Description : GUI for analyzing games in real time using Leela Zero
Games of what? Please clarify the description.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Jul 20, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > And this means that perl (a libcrypt dependency) would be broken between
> > 1 and 5 (or maybe 1 and 3): is this ever going to work?
>
> Given that this new package is going to replace a part of glibc, it
> will need to behave as if it was part of the pseudo-
On Jul 20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I think it's odd to say "here, I'm packaging up a replacement for your
> library, but I'm not going to coordinate with you" when we are preparing
> a (somewhat) coherent distribution, so I don't think that option should
> be discarded. (Unless you have a reasonabl
On Jul 20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Make sure that glibc splits out libcrypt into its own package, have libc6
> depend on it and then provide libcrypt1? (Because it's really providing
> libcrypt's ABI from another package.) Versioning might be tricky, though.
At some point glibc will just stop build
On Jul 18, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Some day it may replace crypt(3), currently provided by glibc:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_glibc_libcrypt_with_libxcrypt
I tried creating a package which would divert libc's libcrypt, but it
appears to be much harde
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco d'Itri
I intend to package the new version of libxcrypt, which will replace the
orphaned libxcrypt source package.
Some day it may replace crypt(3), currently provided by glibc:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ch
On Feb 19, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > * It relies upon the external VPNGate.net site/service. If this
> > goes away in the lifetime of a stable Debian release users will
> > be screwed.
For the records I do not think that this is important since the whole
purpose of the program is acce
On Feb 01, Adam Borowski wrote:
> This removal would also allow retiring one of hard-coded uids from
> /etc/passwd that's currently present on every Debian system.
Yes please!
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Nov 27, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> `snooze` is a new tool for waiting until a particular time and then running a
> command.
This looks like a lot of NOH work just to not use systemd timer units...
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the sm-archive package.
The package description is:
This milter adds recipients to messages in transit accordingly to the
rules specified in its configuration file.
The package is mature and in decent shape, but I do not currently use it.
--
On May 16, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Yes, that's why I suggested Flatpak. It would also be possible to use
> a long bwrap command-line - that's what Flatpak does internally.
> One day I should try making game-data-packager's games (mostly the quake
> family) use bwrap like that. This would be easie
On Feb 02, Félix Sipma wrote:
> AdNauseam works like an ad-blocker (it is built atop uBlock-Origin) to
> silently
> simulate clicks on each blocked ad, confusing trackers as to one's real
Are you familiar with the concept of "click fraud"?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signat
On Jul 13, Trevor Bramwell wrote:
> field it is a simpler version of:
>
> awk '{ print $5,$3,$1; }'
Do we really need this trivial program which barely saves typing a few
characters, especially in a standalone package?
Also, what is wrong with cut(1)?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descripti
On Jul 09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Do we really need yet another fork of GNOME?
Probably not, but I suspect that this problem should be solved
upstream...
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mar 05, Giovani Augusto Ferreira wrote:
> The driver used to only read volumes encrypted under a Windows 7 system but
> is
> now Windows Vista and 8 capable and has the write functionality.
The package description is not the right place to explain the
development history of the package: ju
On Jan 10, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
> dumb-init is a simple process supervisor and init system designed to run
> as PID 1 inside minimal container environments (such as Docker). It is a
> deployed as a small, statically-linked binary written in C.
While I can see how distributing statically-linke
On Dec 20, lucas castro wrote:
> I'll take a look at ms-sys-free.
Can you clarify which features it provides over the existing mbr
package?
--
ciao,
Marco
On Aug 17, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> This library allows to to write externals for Pd using the Tcl language.
In this and the other packages maybe it would be a good idea to expand
the "Pd" acronym at least once?
--
ciao,
Marco
pgpX2S5NyuchM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Jul 09, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> I can say that it does: start-stop-daemon misses some functionality you
> need for programs that don't daemonise and log to stdout/stderr, which
> is something I needed only last week. Having said that, I think that
This looks like a job for systemd.
--
ciao,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: udiskie
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : Byron Clark et al.
* URL : https://github.com/coldfix/udiskie
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Python
Description : automounter for removable media
udiskie is
On Jul 28, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Personally I don't feel like dropping libav in favor of ffmpeg now at
> this stage. It's too late for Jessie.
Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an
immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed.
Personally I feel that we have inf
On Jul 28, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Moreover, I am curious why I haven't seen you working on libavcodec
> bugs in Debian before, and why do you believe you can do a better job
> with the ffmpeg package currently on NEW?
Why should he work on libavcodec when he (along with many other people)
wan
On Jul 12, Toni Mueller wrote:
> * Package name: libressl
I am highly doubtful at best.
What are your plans exactly?
Would it have the same SONAME of openssl and conflict+provide it?
Would it be a totally different library which packages would
build-depend on?
Which packages are supposed to
On Jan 25, Sebastien Badia wrote:
> Description : Smarter Puppet deployment, powered by killer robots
I recommend that we keep packages descriptions to factual statements.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Jan 24, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Unlike other Oslo deliverables, it should not be used as a Python library,
> but
> called as a separate process through the oslo-rootwrap command.
Is this really important enough to be part of the package description?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descript
On Nov 20, Ryan Finnie wrote:
> > I think that we can assume the "you should read README.Debian for more
> > information" part for all packages...
> True, but that was more to guide the user, given the fact that the
> package does absolutely nothing without user configuration. Perhaps in
This a
On Nov 20, Ryan Finnie wrote:
> Description : Build a Finnix bootloader stanza on GRUB 2 systems
I think that you should add one or two lines to explain what Finnix is.
At least, the word "rescue" would help a lot...
> Note that there are certain restrictions regarding where the ISO may b
On Oct 11, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > apt-fast is a shellscript wrapper for apt-get that can drastically improve
> > apt
> > download times by downloading packages in parallel, with multiple
> > connections
> > per package.
> well, isn't it huge load for repository servers?
As a mirror operator
Please do not bother.
openrc was recently discussed on debian-devel@ and there was a large
consensus that it is not a credible alternative to upstart and systemd.
We do not need to be able to choose among multiple init implementations.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
On Jun 27, "Bernhard R. Link" wrote:
> I'd prefer to get this fixed in acpi-support-base, but I think you
> have made your point very clear that the only purpose of that package is
> to not do anything if some power manager is running and that to detect this
> perfectly you are totally willing to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marco d'Itri"
* Package name: libkmod
Version : 1
Upstream Author : ProFUSION embedded systems
* License : LGPLv2 or later
Programming Lang: C
Description : a library to handle kernel modules
libkmod prov
On Nov 27, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > There are plenty of other popular web servers which support fastcgi...
> I'm a bit sceptical to your "plenty". It is pretty hard to find easy
> to use and lightweight and working ones and in Debian.
Looks like I was confusing the functionality of this package
On Nov 27, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> FCGI::Daemon is a small FastCGI server for use as fcgiwrap alternative with
> nginx web server. It is enforcing RLIMITs and running unmodified
Is this software actually nginx-specific in some way?
There are plenty of other popular web servers which support fas
On Nov 03, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:13:46PM +0100, Wolfgang Frisch wrote:
> > > Description : TCP tunnel through the standard DNS protocol
> > How does this differ to dns2tcp?
> Or iodine?
iodine tunnels IP, which is not very efficient if you only need ssh.
--
On Nov 03, Wolfgang Frisch wrote:
> * Package name: tcp-over-dns
How is this different from dns2tcp?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Aug 19, intrigeri+deb...@boum.org wrote:
> Metadata consist of information that characterizes data. Metadata are
Interesting program, but the description should list all the file
formats it supports.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
On Aug 14, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Yes, because the upstream maintainers decided that the current scheme
> > cannot work and will remove support for it.
> > I do not know how long it will be feasible to keep it as a Debian patch.
> It works today for many users. I don't see why it would stop wo
On Aug 13, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Marco, do you have any plans for using this scheme as an option or as
> > the default?
Yes, because the upstream maintainers decided that the current scheme
cannot work and will remove support for it.
I do not know how long it will be feasible to keep it as a De
On Jul 24, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> * Package name: openbgpd
> Version : 4.6+port4.9.20110612
Which port is this, and where does it come from?
Is it kFreeBSD-only? Does it have any limitations compared with the
native OpenBSD version?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digi
On Feb 11, Jan Wagner wrote:
> I intend to orphan the asused package. It only supports IPv4 and upstream is
> dead since ages.
True, but this does not make it less useful since its purpose has not
changed...
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 602503 ppp
retitle 602503 integrate the EAP-TLS patch
severity wishlist
thanks
On Nov 11, werner.jae...@t-systems.com wrote:
> I contacted him and asked him about that. Here is his answer:
>
> "yes, that's correct: it has been on my TODO list for quite some time now to
> work through t
On Nov 05, Werner Jaeger wrote:
> This package contains an extended Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daemon
> with support for EAP-TLS authentication.
I expect that the ftpmasters will not accept a seconda copy of the whole
ppp package without a good reason.
Why the EAPTLS patch cannot be merged bo
On Sep 07, Andrea Gasparini wrote:
> Brian, it lacks the long description, right, we'll provide one asap.
> Though, it serves just one file a given number of times, and then shutdown.
> It's something useful for distributing file in a LAN, if you don't want to
> install and setup a complete/com
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the ppp package.
The package is in an acceptable shape, but I need a lot of help with
bugs triaging and fixing.
The upstream maintainers are not exactly MIA, but they tend to ignore
patches and requests.
--
ciao,
Marco
signat
On Feb 03, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> But, that's still a license. But look carefully, it says "without fee" in the
> license. I don't know if that means "you can use it without paying anyone" or
> "you can only redistribute it if you don't charge anyone".
The first meaning is the one widely accepted
On Nov 16, Andres Mejia wrote:
> Well, really the only reason why I'm even bothering to package this is
> because
> I'm working on an assignment which I want to make sure builds and runs on
> CentOS and OSX and making Digest::SHA::PurePerl work would be easier for me
> than making Digest::SHA
On Nov 13, "Alejandro Rios P." wrote:
> Description : very fast and configurable SIP server
It may be a good idea to mention in the long description that it is a
fork of OpenSER.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Oct 07, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> may be a fail of the dissident test, as there is the word "must".
Which would not make it non-free either, as it is not part of the DFSG.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sep 16, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> People are still using pop/imap before smtp? OMG.
People are also still using 10 years old systems in production, so
anything that helps integrating them in modern infrastructure is
useful.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marco d'Itri"
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev-extras.git;a=summary
It will be uploaded next month, I expect that it will not differ much
from the Ubuntu package.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Apr 10, "brian m. carlson" wrote:
> I don't know about you, but I'd much prefer to modify any sort of
> program, firmware or not, using C or assembly rather than editing the
> binary directly. I suspect that this is the case for any reasonable
> programmer. Thus, we do not have the preferred
On Mar 02, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> If somebody still uses UUCP it would be great if they could take care of
> it from now on. It isn't exactly a fast moving target, but as this
I still happily use it for my mail and if nobody else feels more
qualified I will give it the love it needs.
Co-mainta
On Nov 30, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Qmail is dead upstream and requires a whole set of patches to even begin to
> work in the manner expected of a modern MTA. Given this, the fact that this
> means there is also no upstream security support, and the fact that Debian
> already co
On Aug 07, Jacob Appelbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Micah Anderson encouraged me to package this software. We were both
> annoyed that it is both very useful and seemingly abandoned software.
What does it provide exactly over the other DNS tunneling packages
available in Debian?
--
ciao,
Mar
On Aug 04, Juan Manuel Garcia Molina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This daemon cover the GPRS/3G functions for develop and work
> over GPRS/3G
Can you try again with a description written in english?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mar 12, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm packaging a bunch of security tools that I use in my job pen testing.
I do not understand how you would use such a tool in packaged form.
If you can install a package then obviously you already have root
access, and at that point you can chec
On Mar 12, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sucrack is a multithreaded Linux/UNIX tool for cracking local user
> accounts via wordlist bruteforcing su
What is the point of packaging this?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Nov 03, Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The packages from main should work without things from non-free, I think...
The rule is that they must not depend on packages not in main.
"Work without other things" is not the criteria we use, and e.g. ICQ
clients fail it.
> The rt73 driv
On Oct 30, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do you want to make a separate package for such a tiny shell script?
> The overhead is just two much.
> I'd propose to include it into the powermgmt-base package.
I fully agree, it's silly to create a package for a 2 KB shell script.
--
c
On Sep 27, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> High Availability Port Monitor (HAPM) is a local port status check. It is a
> simple, light and fast daemon to check TCP/UDP ports. If one or more monitored
> ports (per IP) downs then the Heartbeat will be killed by HAPM. This is a
On Sep 03, Stanley Jaddoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most programs that are designed to be run as daemons do that work for
> themselves. However, you?ll occasionally run across one that does not. When
> you
> must run a daemon program that does not properly make itself into a true Unix
> daemon
On Aug 14, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is libwww-perl. I don't object to furl, but so far I am not
> convinced.
I object, since so far it looks like a worthless waste of disk space.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Jan 04, Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a USB card reader which has 5 different slots for various media.
> If I plug in the card reader and then later insert a CF card, the CF
> card slot's device does not have the partition device created when using
> udev (I have to insert
On Sep 15, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In any case we do need to get d-i's udev support fully sorted out fairly
> urgently as 2.6.13 approaches, and that will likely involve at least
As I explained on -boot, I understand that you can start integrating
udev now and later convert the h
On Sep 15, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realise that this package will eventually be superseded by changes in
> (or rewrites of) the udev/hotplug stack. However, in the meantime it
"Eventually" will be next month. Do you really want to do this?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I plan to package hotplug-ng (license: GPL v2).
Probably the first uploads will go to experimental, because I think that
the program will change its interfaces frequently and will not be a full
hotplug replacement for a while.
Considering that I also maintain ude
On Dec 28, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the biggest issue is: belpic includes gtk code so it can do a gui
> > popup to ask for a pin. I'm not sure it is nice to link libopensc
> > with gtk. I'd rather prefer a mechanism where the application
> > registeres a callback function. maybe
On Oct 10, Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The driver needs firmware to function, so this package is going into
> crontrib.
The driver does not need any firmware, your card does.
This is a free driver and should go in main.
--
ciao, |
Marco | [8450 tr8U7gAHS8DGw]
signature.asc
Descr
On Aug 06, Ian Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After asking on debian-security, it appears that there is still a
> demand for pgp in debian. Although gpg provides a superset of
> features, it doesn't have IDEA support compiled in (it is
> patent-encumbered) but pgp, as it is non-US/non-free,
Any news?
I consider devlabel an important complement to hotplug and udev.
Please don't waste time trying to support devfs, it's going away soon
anyway.
--
ciao, |
Marco | [5502 tiPo8yz7i6nsU]
On Jan 29, Laurent Fousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>retitle 207389 ITP: canlock - library for creating and verifying cancel locks.
I packaged libcanlock years ago and then asked for it to be removed from
the distribution because no program ever used it. Why do you want to
package it?
--
ciao
On Jul 03, Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Package name: zebra-pj
> Version : 0.94+cvs20030701
I'm happy you decided to package zebra-pj, but I think it should just
replace the current zebra package. The official code is old and buggy,
and I see no reason to keep it
On Feb 12, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Package name: nglister
This really looks overkill, this program could be replaced with a couple
of perl one liners. Please do not package it.
--
ciao,
Marco
On Jan 13, Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>And due to Apogee's idiotic position on this, we will likely not be able
>to distribute rott at all, since it depends on data files.
Allowing users to install the binary package and provide their own data
files would be useful as well.
--
ciao,
M
On Mar 18, Patrick Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Package name: wvtftpd
Are you really sure debian needs its third TFTP daemon?
--
ciao,
Marco
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
