Bug#515793: ITP: CGIT -- C-code Web Front-end to GIT

2012-07-30 Thread Marc Singer
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Marc, > > Marc Singer wrote: > > > Do you need my help? > > Yes, because I do not use cgit. We would need an active user to make > sure it keeps working and to evaluate requests that come in through > the

Bug#515793: ITP: CGIT -- C-code Web Front-end to GIT

2012-07-30 Thread Marc Singer
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Marc, > > Marc Singer wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Jonathan Nieder > wrote: > > >> Did you mean this to be a private reply? > > > > Not really. > > Ok, cc-ing the bug

Bug#515793: Get cgit included with statically linked libgit.a?

2010-03-15 Thread Marc Singer
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 15:51 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer: > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Paul Menzel >wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 09:40 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer: > > > > The upstream bui

Bug#515793: Get cgit included with statically linked libgit.a?

2010-03-07 Thread Marc Singer
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Marc, > > > Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 09:40 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer: > > The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit > > which this package links statically. Thus, this package prac

Bug#515793: ITP: CGIT -- C-code Web Front-end to GIT

2009-02-17 Thread Marc Singer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically depends on a change to git-core. http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.deb

Bug#192730: ITP: annoyance-filter

2003-05-09 Thread Marc Singer
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:55:48PM +0200, Thomas Scheffczyk wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > > Hello, > > I intend to create a package for 'annoyance-filter'. It's always nice to have options. Is there something compelling about using annoyance-filter over bogofilter?