On 07/14/2009 02:36:27 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> That should not be a problem, renaming the source package afterwards
> does
> not imply major work, just few strings changed here and there.
I just noticed the other day that using "no confirm" in the config file
does not work unless the line is
> I've noticed you are managing the version number as if it was a
> float.
Yeah, I was not aware of this issue at all. It's all the same to me,
so I could make the next one 0.6.2, or else 0.70.
I thought the debian package was going to be called seetxt, you may
have to bug Joop about that as
At the request/recommendation of someone at "Savannah" I have added
some more explicit copyright and licensing info, qv.
https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9211
The code remains the same so I have not incremented the version. The
tarballs via
www.intergate.com/~halfcountplus/see/
seetxt.sourceforg
e javascript?
I will add some kind of short web "intro to see" later this week,
trying to demonstrate how I envision it's use particularly under GNOME.
--MK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I have added about 30% to the codebase while playing with see in lenny,
which is very different than my normal environment -- mostly new
features and improved functionality. I am still testing it and will
release it as version 0.6 sometime this weekend.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wn
On 03/09/2009 02:25:29 PM, Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> I will see the freshmeat announcement when it's ready. I will be away
> most of next week but will start working on it when I get back.
Great, I will take a bit more time to tinker with this, then.
I was using it in GNOME via lenny*, and deci
Here's what's going on:
0.54 is done, I just have to test it for a few days and redo parts of
the man page. The changes are:
-the package name will remain "see", but the executable will be seetxt,
with a softlink from seeman for loading man pages.
-the man page check now uses the return value o
Just a note: The -m switch may cause a problem if you try a
non-existent manpage on a non-english system. I have discussed this
with Joop a bit and the next version should work everywhere. I'll wait
until we have agreed upon the name and then update the site.
Mark Eriksen
--
To UNSUB
On 03/03/2009 08:25:22 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
-> MK wrote:
-> > I
-> > have not been able to find any conflicts by googling.
-> >
->
-> IMO, the best way to find conflicts is to use apt-file, not google.
Thanks for that. I actually use fedora! (no real prefer
Mark Eriksen (the upstream author) here.
My desire for the binary and package name would be "seetxt", which I
have not been able to find any conflicts by googling. I will probably
then also use a softlink to the binary, "seeman", which shouldn't
conflict either.
Regarding portability: GN
10 matches
Mail list logo
