Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions

2012-06-27 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 23:13 +0200, Kai Storbeck wrote: > I'm a bit perplexed that the module authors have anything to do with > this as long as they are clearly stating their code is released under > the artistic license. This is my position, stated somewhat more clearly. The particular license o

Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions

2012-06-27 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 14:25 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 06/27/2012 01:54 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote: > > Define "derivative". Until it's compiled, it's not. > > Right. Unfortunately for debian, and any other binary distributor of > CPAN modules,

Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions

2012-06-27 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 13:42 -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:52:28PM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 12:49 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > > On 06/27/2012 12:38 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote: > > > > It's unenfo

Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions

2012-06-27 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 12:49 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 06/27/2012 12:38 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote: > > It's unenforcable if the modules in question do not incorporate any > > OpenSSL code and are just an interface to the library. I think this is > > probably the

Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions

2012-06-27 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 10:03 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Given that the perl modules in question clearly contain "OpenSSL" in > their names, this appears to only be satisfied under one of the > following conditions: > > 0) a perl module is not a "product" > 1) these perl modules are not "

Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions

2012-06-27 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 07:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: [snip] > I don't believe #534338 covered Crypt::OpenSSL::AES. However, i do > wonder whether Crypt::OpenSSL::AES has received permission from the > OpenSSL upstrem for the use of the term "OpenSSL" in its name, as > referred to at: > >

Bug#487125: apt-rdepends

2010-06-06 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 17:54 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > If you're still interested in helping out: I wouldn't mind a > co-maintainer. Do as you see fit. You may remove me from the email list for the bug or not as you please. I am very busy at the moment. I might have a go at doing some debian

Bug#580533: ITP: libtest-notabs-perl -- module for scanning for hard tabs in files

2010-05-06 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Thu, 2010-06-05 at 12:26 -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > 0x09) character. Tabs can render with slightly different width depending on > the author's environment, so it's best to use spaces instead. how obnoxious -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#487125: rdepend

2010-04-30 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Fri, 2010-30-04 at 19:16 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Hi guy, > > Do you intend to be mainteners of rdepends ? I forgot all about that. I think when I looked there was nothing much to do ... you can have it if you like. > > I could help you if needed > > bastien -- --gh -- To

Bug#530615: ITP: libfile-temp-perl -- return name and handle of a temporary file safely

2009-05-26 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Tue, 2009-26-05 at 11:05 -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > However, I think within the Perl community, this is something that is > already widely understood -- that is, dual-lived modules. This is a 'debian' list ... -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org wi

Bug#487125: RFA: apt-rdepends -- Recursively lists package dependencies

2009-04-10 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Fri, 2009-10-04 at 13:01 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: > I'm looking for a new maintainer for the package apt-rdepends, and CCing to > the > debian-perl list as I hope someone with good Perl programming skills could be > interested in upstream-maintenance of this script. I could do this. This