Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I would like to find a new maintainer for dchroot.
-David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I would like to find a new maintainer for genext2fs. The package is
used by the installer. This is a small package without a lot of
activity upstream.
-David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am hoping to find someone to adopt the subversion Debian package.
subversion is a fun package to maintain. Upstream is active, the
userbase is large and the software is high quality. However, at present
I do not have the resources to maintain it as I would l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cvs2svn
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/
* License : Apache (BSD-ish)
Description : cvs2svn : convert a cvs repository to a subversion
repository
cvs2svn started out life as pa
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-20
Severity: normal
I no longer use ebtables. I hope someone who uses it will pick it up.
Thanks,
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux heybaby 2.4.21-powerpc #1 Sun Sep 14 21:02:46
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-20
Severity: normal
I no longer have time to maintain mserv properly. Upstream has started
development again so there are new upstream versions.
-David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linu
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-08
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kernel-patch-ebtables
Version : 2.0.003
Upstream Author : Bart De Schuymer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description :
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-17
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ebtables
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : Bart De Schuymer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://users.pandora.be/bart.de.schuymer/ebtables/
* License : GPL
Description
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dchroot
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/
* License : GPL
Description : Too
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-22
Severity: normal
Hi,
I request an adopter for the mopd package.
I no longer have hardware that does MOP. I'll keep maintaining it until
someone wants it since it isn't any work (zero upstream action and no
bugs), but it would be best if someone wh
FYI,
uscan, in the devscripts package appears to do most (all?) of what
vcheck does. Obviously if you decide to package vcheck anyway, go
right ahead.
-David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The source has disappeared from the site indicated in the RFP. It
looks like it can now be found here:
http://diddl.firehead.org/software/unix/hack/garp-0.7.2.tar.gz
FWIW,
-David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:56:01PM +0200 wrote:
> I'm trying to setup a subversion server for debian
super, I want to do that as well, the sooner the better, as long as
people understand that subversion is still in active development and
shouldn't be trusted.
> but I'm running
> into a slight catc
Hi,
FWIW I'd like to see them uploaded as well (mostly since I want to get
Subversion uploaded). I don't know of anything keeping the packages
from being uploaded, though last time I talked to willy he indicated
he was waiting for woody to be released before he was going to worry
about it.
> If
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-07
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xsupplicant
Version : 0.2b
Upstream Author : Bryan D. Payne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
Nick L. Petroni Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://www.open1x.org/
* License
Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:26:23PM + wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> > 1. Berkeley db 3.3 - a bug has been filed (http::/bugs.debian.org/109853)
> > I have been building with the preliminary packages on
> > people.debian.org/~dwhedon
Hi all,
As you can see subversion has some dependancies that aren't yet in
Debian.
Things we are waiting on include :
1. Berkeley db 3.3 - a bug has been filed (http::/bugs.debian.org/109853)
I have been building with the preliminary packages on
people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/.
2. apache2.
> > I've got time at the moment so I'd be happy to work on this. If you
> > change it to RFP I'll come along and change it back to ITP, I think
> > that is the easiest way of doing it, or maybe just an e-mail to the
> > BTS saying that I'm ITP'ing it.
>
> Any progress on this? I just read S
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
This package isn't a whole lot of work but I'm not very interested in
it anymore. I do want the package to stay in Debian, maybe there is
someone who would have more time for it?
I really like the idea of the game, flying around and saving people in
distress.
> There is some problems with co-existing with the libneon15 package all
> ready available in Debian and for full support for Subversion we need
> a newer libdb3.
>
and we need apache2, I think, which isn't even in unstable yet (but
people are working on it).
> These problems takes longer time to
Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 03:34:43PM +0200 wrote:
> I'll maintain this package from now on (if everybody's OK with that).
Great, I'm glad to hear it :-)
> I do not want to make any major change right now. However, I intend to
> add Recommands:boot-floppies since I don't see why you would have bf-utf
>
hmm, I just found 'shred' in GNU fileutils.
Given the fact that we already have 'wipe' and 'shred' I don't see a reason
to package 'srm'.
-David
Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 03:40:58PM -0400 wrote:
> > How does it differ from `wipe'?
>
> How about secure delete? It, AFAIK, is NOT packaged. The freshmea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
removes files, but overwrites the data first, making recovery more
difficult.
The most obvious name for the binary is 'srm', probably should be in
/usr/bin/ rather than /bin. That conflicts with the pacakge zlibc's
/usr/bin/srm.
Anyone have ideas for a replace
Hi,
I'd like to play with subversion too. I don't want to step on any toes, or
repeat work though. I'm happy to help out however I can. Do you have any
preliminary pacakging done?
-David
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
The Library Optimizer examines the complete target file system, resolves
all shared library symbol references, and rebuilds the shared libraries
with only the object files required to satisfy the symbol references.
This is similar in function to mklibs.[sh|py], sc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I want if for debian-installer, maybe boot-floppies, is it already included in
something? My searching turned up nothing so far.
http://freshmeat.net/redir/genext2fs/3173/url_tgz/genext2fs-1.3.tgz
// ext2 filesystem generator for embedded systems
// Copyright (C
26 matches
Mail list logo
