Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robin Jarry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-txrequests
Version : 0.9.6
Upstream Author : Pierre Tardy
* URL : https://github.com/tardyp/txrequests
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergio de Almeida Cipriano Junior
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, sergios...@riseup.net
* Package name: python3-flask-dance
Version : v5.1.0
Upstream Author : David Baumgold
* URL : https://github.com/singingwolfboy
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2022 21:51:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1004739: fixed in mozjs91 91.7.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004739,
regarding ITP: mozjs91 -- SpiderMonkey JavaScript library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2022 21:22:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1004739: fixed in mozjs91 91.7.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004739,
regarding ITP: mozjs91 -- SpiderMonkey JavaScript library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1006938 RFP: docker-buildx -- docker CLI plugin for BuildKit
Bug #1006938 [wnpp] docker.io lacks buildx
Bug #989917 [wnpp] RFP: docker-buildx -- docker CLI plugin for BuildKit
Changed Bug title to 'RFP: docker-buildx -- docker CLI plugin f
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug #1006938 [docker.io] docker.io lacks buildx
Bug reassigned from package 'docker.io' to 'wnpp'.
No longer marked as found in versions docker.io/20.10.11+dfsg1-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1006938 to the same values
previous
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: openjph
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Author : aous72 (github)
* URL : https://github.com/aous72/OpenJPH
* License : BSD-2
Programming Lang: C++
Hi,
There is a new upstream version but the package is not yet an official
Debian package.
What is exactly the issue here?
Regards,
Tarik
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 18:07:33 +0100 Vieno Hakkerinen
wrote:
Any news about this issue?
I stumbled over this while searching why eyeOfGnome does not show
[http://ju.bchmoi.com/go/NzI2NzQx/q61n201p33qr8r8n10296226]
Voir les images en ligne
[http://ju.bchmoi.com/go/NzI2NzQx/q61n201p33qr8r8n10296226] -Se désabonner
[http://ju.bchmoi.com/go/NzI2NzQw/q61n201p33qr8r8n10296226][http://cl.bchmoi.com/hello/j7uDYWzLLzDOxUPthydSJZ5oDlnasxERKAQBJL5Cw8U/FQDpjeYy
9 matches
Mail list logo