Processed: simutrans pack128

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 804450 RFP: simutrans-pak128 Bug #804450 [wnpp] simutrans: please package pack128 Changed Bug title to 'RFP: simutrans-pak128' from 'simutrans: please package pack128'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#959765: Existing Packaging in Debian Science Team

Also, note the packaging already exists in the Debian Science Team [1]. This would need to be updated for a Bazel build. That process is still expected to be a bit of a hack with the current `bazel-bootstrap` package but the Debian Bazel team will be happy to offer advice and assistance. [1] https

Processed: block 959765 with 782654

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 959765 with 782654 Bug #959765 [wnpp] RFP: tensorflow -- Computation using data flow graphs for scalable machine learning (C) 959765 was not blocked by any bugs. 959765 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 959765: 782654 > th

Bug#959765: RFP: tensorflow -- Computation using data flow graphs for scalable machine learning (C)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: tensorflow Version : 2.0.1 Upstream Author : Google Inc. * URL : https://www.tensorflow.org/ * License : Apache Programming Lang: Python Description : Computation using data flow graphs for scalable machi

Processed: unblock 959738 with 782654

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 959738 with 782654 Bug #959738 [tensorflow] tensorflow: Package tensorflow Warning: Unknown package 'tensorflow' 959738 was blocked by: 782654 959738 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 959738: 782654 Warning: Unknown pac

Bug#893580:

Hello, I finished packaging 0.9.1 some time ago, but I was unable to find a sponsor. If you know someone that would be willing to sponsor the upload, it'd be much appreciated. The original sponsorship request was filed as bug #894474. Christian On 4/10/2020 5:44 AM, Yangfl wrote: > Control: blo

Bug#959739: ITP: editorconfig-checker -- tool to verify that your files are in harmony with your .editorconfig

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stephan Lachnit Package name: editorconfig-checker Version : 2.0.3 Upstream Author : editorconfig-checker team URL : https://github.com/editorconfig-checker/editorconfig- checker L

Bug#848568: My Apr 24 E-mail

Not hearing back can I assume there is no interest in getting an updated fixed version of bwbasic? Actually now it is bwbasic-3.20b. I spoke with Vince about this and he felt I could take on a maintainers role. Can someone get back to me Thank you.

Processed: Debian bugs #804450

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 804450 wnpp Bug #804450 [simutrans] simutrans: please package pack128 Bug reassigned from package 'simutrans' to 'wnpp'. No longer marked as found in versions simutrans/111.3.1-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #804450 to

Bug#922088: I'd like to adopt the file-rc Debian package

The new version 0.8.19 can be obtained from: git://devel2.cuci.nl/file-rc Also, consider this an application to become a registered Debian maintainer. My credentials: - author of procmail - Linux kernel developer since 1992 - GCC developer for two years - PostgreSQL developer -- Stephen

Bug#959434: ITP: awf-gtk2 -- A widget factory is a theme preview application

That's a good news, but I'm also sad. Perhpas I can push my package with a "tag" like yes remove me when Debian drop gtk2? Le 03/05/2020 à 02:17, Paul Wise a écrit : On Sat, 02 May 2020 12:47:42 +0200 luigifab wrote: This package include the gtk2 version. Debian is attempting to remove GT

Processed: block 959738 with 782654

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 959738 with 782654 Bug #959738 [tensorflow] tensorflow: Package tensorflow Warning: Unknown package 'tensorflow' 959738 was not blocked by any bugs. 959738 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 959738: 782654 Warning: Unknown p

Bug#948330: marked as done (ITP: libsys-info-perl -- Fetch information from the host system)

Your message dated Mon, 4 May 2020 17:22:05 +0200 with message-id <0f7a7003-fe26-920b-3bc8-add644e4f...@vu.nl> and subject line Re: ITP: libsys-info-perl -- Fetch information from the host system has caused the Debian Bug report #948330, regarding ITP: libsys-info-perl -- Fetch information from th

Bug#948329: marked as done (ITP: libsys-info-driver-linux-perl -- Linux driver for Sys::Info)

Your message dated Mon, 4 May 2020 17:22:54 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: ITP: libsys-info-driver-linux-perl -- Linux driver for Sys::Info has caused the Debian Bug report #948329, regarding ITP: libsys-info-driver-linux-perl -- Linux driver for Sys::Info to be marked as done. This

Bug#954209: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Do we want to add a fork of utls (ITP #954209)?

Hi there, I see this ticket after I packaged and uploaded an intermediate upstream of this package: * https://github.com/refraction-networking/utls * https://bugs.debian.org/959534 On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:37 PM Ana Custura wrote: > > Hi Ulrike and Cecylia, > > Thank you for looking at this! >

Processed: Re: ITP: shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin -- Yet another SIP003 plugin for shadowsocks, based on v2ray

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 922360 by 908921 Bug #922360 [wnpp] ITP: shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin -- Yet another SIP003 922360 was not blocked by any bugs. 922360 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 922360: 908921 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed (with 2 errors): ITP: shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin -- Yet another SIP003 plugin for shadowsocks, based on v2ray

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 922360 ! Bug #922360 [wnpp] RFP: shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin -- Yet another SIP003 plugin for shadowsocks, based on v2ray Owner recorded as Roger Shimizu . > tags 922360 +pending Bug #922360 [wnpp] RFP: shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin -- Yet another

Bug#951551: ITP: httpx -- fully featured HTTP client, with sync and async APIs, and support for both HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2

On 04/05/2020 00:52, Sandro Tosi wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 4:14 AM Andrej Shadura wrote: Hi Sandro, On 18/03/2020 19:55, Sandro Tosi wrote: I’m glad to see you started to work on this. Is there anything I can help with?\ I think i'm good, thanks for checking in. Have you had time

Processed (with 1 error): Re: ITP: v2ray -- A platform for building proxies to bypass network restrictions.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 908921 +pending Bug #908921 [wnpp] ITP: golang-v2ray-core -- Library platform for Added tag(s) pending. > retitle 908921 ITP: golang-v2ray-core -- Library platform for building Bug #908921 [wnpp] ITP: golang-v2ray-core -- Library platform for

Bug#674887: marked as done (ITA: vbetool -- run real-mode video BIOS code to alter)

Your message dated Mon, 04 May 2020 11:19:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#674887: fixed in vbetool 1.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #674887, regarding ITA: vbetool -- run real-mode video BIOS code to alter to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: Re: ITP: v2ray -- A platform for building proxies to bypass network restrictions.

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 ITP: golang-v2ray-core -- Library platform for Bug #908921 [wnpp] ITP: v2ray -- A platform for building proxies to bypass network restrictions Changed Bug title to 'ITP: golang-v2ray-core -- Library platform for' from 'ITP: v2ray -- A platform for buildi

Bug#908921: ITP: v2ray -- A platform for building proxies to bypass network restrictions.

control: retitle -1 ITP: golang-v2ray-core -- Library platform for building proxies in golang control: tags -1 +pending Dear Paul, > I found that v2ray actually depends on golang-starlark. So we need to > work on that first. I packaged v2ray, and its dependencies. All gits are pushed to salsa: -

Processed: RFP: audacity-manual -- This is the user manual for Audacity audio editor

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 959704 RFP: audacity-manual -- This is the user manual for Audacity > audio editor Bug #959704 [wnpp] TAG: audacity-manual -- This is the user manual for Audacity audio editor Changed Bug title to 'RFP: audacity-manual -- This is the use

Processed: RFS blocks ITP

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 954844 by 959683 Bug #954844 [wnpp] ITP: mangohud -- An overlay for monitoring FPS, temperatures, and more 954844 was not blocked by any bugs. 954844 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 954844: 959683 > thanks Stopping proce

Bug#959704: TAG: audacity-manual -- This is the user manual for Audacity audio editor

Package: wnpp Severity: RFP Audacity is a multi-track audio editor. It is designed for easy recording, playing and editing of digital audio. Audacity features digital effects and spectrum analysis tools. Editing is very fast and provides unlimited undo/redo. Although an online manual is availabl

Bug#959703: ITP: jsofa -- Java translation of IAU SOFA library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ole Streicher X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-j...@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-as...@lists.debian.org * Package name: jsofa Version : 20190722 Upstream Author : * URL : http://javastro.github.io/jsofa/ * Licens

Bug#950198: restinio

On 04/05 09:18, Sébastien Delafond wrote: > I re-ran the build this morning from the repository you created, and it > passes here in sbuild; TTBOMK it's only binding its test router to > 127.0.0.1, and not trying to reach anything outside, but I may be > missing something. > > I add a basic d/sals

Bug#912338: ITP: createrepo-c -- tool to create RPM repository metadata (C implementation)

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:17:49AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:03:38 +0200 Peter Pentchev wrote: > > The real reason I have not gone forward with the packaging of > > createrepo-c is an IMHO severe licensing problem upstream as you can see > > at http

Bug#912338: ITP: createrepo-c -- tool to create RPM repository metadata (C implementation)

Hi Peter, On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:03:38 +0200 Peter Pentchev wrote: > The real reason I have not gone forward with the packaging of > createrepo-c is an IMHO severe licensing problem upstream as you can see > at https://github.com/rpm-software-management/createrepo_c/issues/106 - > and so far there

Processed: ITP: libbaseencode -- C library for encoding and decoding data using base32 or base64

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 959690 Bug #959690 [wnpp] ITP: libbaseencode -- C library for encoding and decoding data using base32 or base64 Marked Bug as done > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 959690: https://bugs.debian.o

Bug#950198: restinio

On 03/05 19:40, Alexandre Viau wrote: > Also, I notice that the package's Changelog already has two entries, > but was it even uploaded once? Should it say UNRELEASED instead, until > it is uploaded, or should I understand that it was uploaded? This was my mistake, it should have said UNRELEASED a

Bug#959692: ITP: otpclient -- Simple GTK+ software to generate OTPs (TOTP and HOTP)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro * Package name: otpclient Version : 2.2.1 Upstream Author : Paolo Stivanin * URL : https://github.com/paolostivanin/OTPClient * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: C Description :