Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Colberg
* Package name: dsfmt
Version : 2.2.3
Upstream Author : Mutsuo Saito and Makoto Matsumoto
* URL : http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/SFMT/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: C
Descri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: err
Version : 3.1.1
Upstream Author : Guillaume Binet
* URL : http://errbot.net/
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : pluggable chatbot
Err is a chatbot designed to be simple to exten
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # bugs with submitter stein.mag...@jodal.no
> submitter 795085 jo...@debian.org
Bug #795085 [pafy] python-pafy: Upstream supports Python 2.6+, but Debian
package only Python 3
Changed Bug submitter to 'jo...@debian.org' from 'Stein Magnus Jodal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # bugs with submitter stein.mag...@jodal.no
> submitter 803202 !
Bug #803202 {Done: Chris Lamb } [python-gunicorn]
python-gunicorn: post-inst fails to pycompile _gaiohttp.py
Bug #803170 {Done: Chris Lamb } [python-gunicorn]
python-gunicorn: fail
On 28/10/15 21:04, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Nicholas Bamber dixit:
1.) If ksh is installed then ksh should be in /etc/shells. (#790118)
I don’t think so. Users should be getting ksh93 or mksh (or, in
earlier releases, even pdksh), but not an alternative.
2.) If ksh is not installed but mksh i
Nicholas Bamber dixit:
> 1.) If ksh is installed then ksh should be in /etc/shells. (#790118)
I don’t think so. Users should be getting ksh93 or mksh (or, in
earlier releases, even pdksh), but not an alternative.
> 2.) If ksh is not installed but mksh is and ksh links to mksh via
> alternatives
I know about the new version, I also tried to compile it for Debian, but
it was alsways failing either because of internal compiler error or
other reasons. And now I just have no time for packaing it.
28 жовтня 2015 о 09:47 + Florian Schanda написав(-ла):
> Hi,
>
> I am one of the SPARK devel
On mer. 28 oct. 2015 à 22:53:48, shirish wrote:
> at bottom :-
>
> On 10/28/2015 08:47 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> >On mer. 28 oct. 2015 à 20:19:49, shirish wrote:
> >>Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue,
> >>
> >>Any update on the packaging of Mailman-3-core ?
> >>
> >>Looking forward to learn more.
at bottom :-
On 10/28/2015 08:47 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
On mer. 28 oct. 2015 à 20:19:49, shirish wrote:
Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue,
Any update on the packaging of Mailman-3-core ?
Looking forward to learn more.
Good afternoon,
Heres some update:
* I had some troubles with depend
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:05:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#797660: fixed in notary 0.0~git20150801.0.8e8122e-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #797660,
regarding ITP: golang-github-docker-notary -- a tool for running and
interacting with trusted collections
to be mar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 244582
Bug #244582 {Done: "Interfax" } [wnpp] ITP: ufoai --
UFO: Alien Invasion - build your team and stop the aliens
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #244582 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping
Hi Afif,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 09:33:44PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>
> I'm sorry about that-- I could've sworn I had it right. I think it
> should be good now. Andreas, would you mind uploading again? The
> corrected version is in git now.
Uploaded and please Git pull. I fixed the "old FS
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:00:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#802684: fixed in radcli 1.2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #802684,
regarding ITP: radcli - RADIUS client library for C applications
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue,
Any update on the packaging of Mailman-3-core ?
Looking forward to learn more.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal,
Community Lead,
Hamaralinux.org
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:40:39PM +, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: w...@debian.org
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-p...@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> Package name: libtext-unicode-equivalents-perl
> Version : 0.05
> Upstream Autho
On 28/10/15 15:19, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Nicholas Bamber dixit:
Please could Thorsten and Dominik please work out who will be responsible for
mksh in Debian? Can you work together if that makes sense? I can sign and
upload if necessary.
OK, we had a short talk on the office floor about this
Nicholas Bamber dixit:
> Please could Thorsten and Dominik please work out who will be responsible for
> mksh in Debian? Can you work together if that makes sense? I can sign and
> upload if necessary.
OK, we had a short talk on the office floor about this ;-) and
I’ll be putting myself back int
On mer. 28 oct. 2015 à 20:19:49, shirish wrote:
> Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue,
>
> Any update on the packaging of Mailman-3-core ?
>
> Looking forward to learn more.
Good afternoon,
Heres some update:
* I had some troubles with dependencies, that were fixed in the begining of
October.
* I m
I have thought about this comment a little more:
> It is my agreement with David Korn (the ‘k’ in “ksh”) that
> mksh must not be confused for the original, so please refrain
> from doing so.
It seems to me that if a link from ksh to mksh is not an infringement of
this agreement, then big notic
Thorsten,
> Mh. I’m maintaining mksh in Debian via sponsors currently, even if
> the package doesn’t formally say so, as I left the project.
please either maintain mksh, or don't.
Saying „I have left the project, but want control over packages so and so“
does not make very much sense for the pr
Okay removing Kenneth as he clearly does not want to be involved.
Please could Thorsten and Dominik please work out who will be
responsible for mksh in Debian? Can you work together if that makes
sense? I can sign and upload if necessary.
I have an issue with this:
> I answered your origina
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: w...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-p...@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Package name: libtext-unicode-equivalents-perl
Version : 0.05
Upstream Author : Bob Hallissy
URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Text-Unicode-Eq
Nicholas Bamber dixit:
> Could we get some clarity on this bug report please? I am considering adopting
Yeah, some people have a life and don’t answer eMails 24/7…
> the 'ksh' package and if I do I either want to adopt mksh as well, or work
> closely with the mksh owner.
Mh. I’m maintaining mks
Nicholas Bamber dixit:
> 2. mksh also should provide 'ksh' as a virtual package.
It is my agreement with David Korn (the ‘k’ in “ksh”) that
mksh must not be confused for the original, so please refrain
from doing so.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
„Cool, /usr/share/doc/mksh/examples/uhr.gz ist ja ein Grun
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 798523 + pending
Bug #798523 [wnpp] ITP: cen64-qt -- cen64-qt: Cross-platform graphical frontend
for the CEN64 emulator.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
798523: http://b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthias Klose
* Package name: python-packaging
Version : 15.3
Upstream Author : Donald Stufft
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/packaging
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Python
Description : core utilit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stéphane Glondu"
* Package name: reactivedata
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Hugo Heuzard
* URL : https://github.com/ocsigen/reactiveData
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : FRP with increment
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:00:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796962: fixed in libsdsl 2.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #796962,
regarding ITP: libsdsl -- succinct data structure library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:00:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#802296: fixed in golang-github-stathat-go
0.0~git20130314.0.01d012b-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #802296,
regarding ITP: golang-github-stathat-go -- Go package for reporting stat counts
and values to St
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#803213: fixed in golang-gopkg-olivere-elastic.v2 2.0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #803213,
regarding ITP: golang-gopkg-olivere-elastic.v2 -- Elasticsearch client for
Golang
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:00:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796487: fixed in repeatmasker-recon 1.08-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #796487,
regarding ITP: repeatmasker-recon -- indentification of repeat families from
biological sequences
to be marked as done.
Thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 691199 ITA: ksh -- Real, AT&T version of the Korn shell
Bug #691199 [wnpp] RFA: ksh -- Real, AT&T version of the Korn shell
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: ksh -- Real, AT&T version of the Korn shell' from
'RFA: ksh -- Real, AT&T version of th
Hi,
the proposals posted here seem to make sense.
I will make sure to finalise my adoption of mksh within the next two weeks and
incorporate the desired changes.
Cheers,
Nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918
Tecki
Could we get some clarity on this bug report please? I am considering
adopting the 'ksh' package and if I do I either want to adopt mksh as
well, or work closely with the mksh owner.
Hi,
I am one of the SPARK developers. These days there are two revisions of SPARK
- a legacy version and the new ada-2012 based one. I would recommend to only
package the newer one (spark 2014 -- http://spark-2014.org).
If there is anything I can do to help with this, please let me know.
El 27/10/15 a las 17:21, Debian Bug Tracking System escribió:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> owner 803074 davidam
> Bug #803074 [wnpp] ITP: elisp-es -- Spanish version of An Introduction to
> Programming in Emacs Lisp
> Owner recorded as davidam .
>> stop
> Stopping pr
Hi Edwin,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
> Laszlo, are you still interested in being the maintainer of this package?
Sure, I'm. I was a tester of an other cryptography software behind
the curtains in the past one (+ a bit more) months. It's Crypto++ [1]
and blame me for v5.6
37 matches
Mail list logo
