Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 743675 ITP: python-djando-remote-forms -- Platform independent form
> serializer for Django)
Bug #743675 [wnpp] RFP: python-djando-remote-forms -- Platform independent form
serializer for Django
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: python-djando-r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-djando-remote-forms
Version : 0.0.1 (alpha pre release)
Upstream Author : WiserTogether Tech Team
* URL : https://github.com/WiserTogether/django-remote-forms.git
*
Processing control commands:
> block 639782 by -1
Bug #639782 [wnpp] ITA: codelite -- Powerful and lightweight C/C++ IDE
639782 was not blocked by any bugs.
639782 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 639782: 741730
--
639782: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63978
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 21:30:05 Boris Pek wrote:
> Producing per plugin binary packages is a bad idea in this case. It
> increases the size of Packages.*, Contents-* and Translation-* files in
> arhive too much, that affects all Debian users, but not only Gajim users.
> Also it increases the size of ar
Your message dated Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:00:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#740392: fixed in ck 0.3.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #740392,
regarding ITP: ck -- Concurrency Kit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug #743656 [memoizable] ITP: memoizable -- A gem that offers Memoization is an
optimization that saves the return value of a method so it doesn't need to be
re-computed every time that method is called.
Warning: Unknown package 'memoizable'
Bug re
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Friday 04 April 2014 01:29:59 Per Andersson wrote:
>> The pull request actually removes Debian specific invokation. Check the
>> comment for the python_binary method.
>
> got it.
>
>> I am using it to patch the Debian package. If upstrea
Hi everyone,
>> 3. I see you've called the source package gajim-plugins. If the idea
>> is to potentially maintain a bunch of non-OTR Gajim plugins in the
>> source package, then I doubt it's appropriate to put it under the
>> OTR team's umbrella. So, perhaps a dedicated source packag
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 20:02 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just subscribed to the list in response to this bug. I'd like to
>> help as my time permits. Please add me to the team in alioth, my
>> username is fsateler.
>
> Added
it needs fixing and is reported upstream
https://github.com/fog/fog-json/issues/3
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your rights
from them; you give them permission to rule, only so long as they follow the
rules: laws and constitution.
Your message dated Fri, 04 Apr 2014 16:00:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#741677: fixed in blockfinder 3.14159-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #741677,
regarding ITP: blockfinder -- enumerates network information for countries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 04 Apr 2014 16:00:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#741668: fixed in novena-eeprom 1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #741668,
regarding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:23:19 intrigeri wrote:
> I would personally be happy to see you upload the Gajim OTR plugin,
> and become the primary maintainer for it, under our team's umbrella.
I'm not that keen to do that. Not yet. I did packaging over 6 months ago and
it would have been uploaded long t
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
Upstream url: https://rubygems.org/gems/fog-json
Upstream authors: Wesley Beary (geemus), Paul Thornthwaite
(tokengeek), The fog team
License: Expat
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your rights
from the
Correction to URL : https://www.ip2location.com/developers/c
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
Upstream URL: https://rubygems.org/gems/fog-core
Upstream Authors: Evan Light, Wesley Beary
License: MIT
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your rights
from them; you give them permission to rule, only so
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: shairport
Upstream Author : Albert Zeyer & others
* URL : https://github.com/albertz/shairport
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Play music streamed from iTunes/iPads/iPods
Shairport emulates an Air
Hi,
Raoul Borenius writes:
> I'm the maintainer of the bwct package in Debian:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/source/jessie/bwctl
>
> The next version of bwctl (that I'd like to package for jessie)
> is depending on iperf3.
>
> Do you have any idea how long it will take you to package iperf3?
>
Hi,
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (03 Apr 2014 20:41:07 GMT) :
> Very nice, thanks. I'd like to let you know about "gajim-plugin-otr" (RFP
> #722130) that I packaged some time ago. It is pretty much ready and only need
> someone to take ownership.
I would personally be happy to see you upload the Gajim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 743510 'ITA: libnfs -- NFS client library (development files)'
Bug #743510 [wnpp] O: libnfs -- NFS client library (development files)
Changed Bug title to ''ITA: libnfs -- NFS client library (development files)''
from 'O: libnfs -- NFS cl
On 2014-01-18 at 14:17:42 +0100, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> The current state is that I'm waiting for what appears to be the last
> dependency to go in:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735772
I've noticed that sockjs-client has been uploaded:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sock
Hello Simon,
I'm the maintainer of the bwct package in Debian:
https://packages.debian.org/source/jessie/bwctl
The next version of bwctl (that I'd like to package for jessie)
is depending on iperf3.
Do you have any idea how long it will take you to package iperf3?
Do you need any help with that
Hey Guys,
My day job also involves NFS. Hence I have an interest in it. I'll take
over it.
Thanks,
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:00:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#741387: fixed in python-dugong 2.2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #741387,
regarding ITP: python-dugong -- HTTP 1.1 client module for Python supporting
async io, pipelining and Expect: continue
to be
Your message dated Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:00:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#743475: fixed in ruby-http 0.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #743475,
regarding ITP: ruby-http -- an easy-to-use client library for making http
requests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of crystalhd, Andres Mejia ,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If
On Friday 04 April 2014 01:29:59 Per Andersson wrote:
> The pull request actually removes Debian specific invokation. Check the
> comment for the python_binary method.
got it.
> I am using it to patch the Debian package. If upstream decides to
> include it: great!
> If not, we carry the patch.
F
27 matches
Mail list logo
