Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Saturday 16 November 07:03:13 UTC 2013
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: ntdb
> tags 729165 + pending
Bug #729165 [wnpp] ITP: ntdb -- Trivial
There was a nice bunch of (5-digit) bugs being closed with the removal,
they should be unarchived, reopened and handled properly if xemacs comes
back.
from https://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt:
=
[Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013
On 15 November 2013 12:02, Mark Brown wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mark Brown
>
> * Package name: xemacs21
> Version : 21.4.22
> Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
> URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
> License : GPL
> Programming
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 728592 ITA: mikmod -- Portable tracked music player
Bug #728592 [wnpp] RFA: mikmod -- Portable tracked music player
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: mikmod -- Portable tracked music player' from 'RFA:
mikmod -- Portable tracked music player'
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Friday 15 November 19:03:34 UTC 2013
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/newlib";>newlib
> tags 729441 + pe
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > > Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> > > bugs?
> > By m
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> > bugs?
>
> By making changes to the software.
This discussion is getting a tad too ant
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> > bugs?
>
> By making changes to the software.
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed.
This
I would encourage you to package this to use wxwidgets3.0 (now in
unstable) rather than 2.8, as we're hoping to remove 2.8 for jessie.
The upstream changelog mentions fixes for 2.9 compatibility, so chances
are good it will work with 3.0.
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:24:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#729378: fixed in xcompmgr 1.1.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #729378,
regarding ITA: xcompmgr -- X composition manager
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> bugs?
By making changes to the software.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:01:46PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:34AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> Don't top post.
I was on my phone, thanks for the advice.
> > Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
>
> Yes, of course. Well, the one
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:34AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
Don't top post.
> Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
Yes, of course. Well, the one that was there when I looked is fixed,
I'll see if the BTS tells me about any open ones after the reupload.
signa
Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
On Nov 15, 2013 9:10 AM, "Mark Brown" wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > * Package name: xemacs21
> > > Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Thanks Peter for the notice.
I’m not sure it’s worth keeping in the archive: it’s not even
maintained upstream for two years [1]. If someone disagree, please
consider packaging it with pkg-php-tools and within the Debian PHP
PEAR Maintainers
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Only one note on this: xemacs21 was just removed some months ago, see
> http://bugs.debian.org/725883 for details.
Yes, this is why it needs a new ITP.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On 2013-11-15 8:32, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
>> On Jo, 14 nov 13, 12:39:04, Craig Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Please add expect-lite package to Squeeze & Wheezy
>>>
>> [...]
>
> Since you will be the Maintainer of the package I think you wanted to
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > * Package name: xemacs21
> > Version : 21.4.22
> Wasn't this removed just one month ago?
Yes, this is why I'm ITPing it.
signature.asc
Description: Di
* Louis Wust [Mon Nov 11, 2013 at 06:59:46PM -0500]:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013, at 3:54, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > Fine for me, please prepare an upload where you take over the
> > maintainer field accordingly.
> Would you be willing to sponsor my package?
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/iwatch
Dearest friend.docx
Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 692578 1.4-1
Bug #692578 [wnpp] RFA: shinken -- Flexible monitoring tool - Meta-package
There is no source info for the package 'wnpp' at version '1.4-1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.4-1'
Marked as fix
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:51:30 +0100
with message-id <528618d2.80...@debian.org>
and subject line OK
has caused the Debian Bug report #692578,
regarding RFA: shinken -- Flexible monitoring tool - Meta-package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> * Package name: xemacs21
> Version : 21.4.22
Wasn't this removed just one month ago?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725883
Berto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mark Brown
>
> * Package name: xemacs21
> Version : 21.4.22
> Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
> URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
> License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Brown
* Package name: xemacs21
Version : 21.4.22
Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, elisp
Description : highly customizable text edit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 729378 ITA: xcompmgr -- X composition manager
Bug #729378 [wnpp] O: xcompmgr -- X composition manager
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: xcompmgr -- X composition manager' from 'O: xcompmgr
-- X composition manager'
> owner 729378 !
Bug #729378 [
On 2013-11-15 8:32, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 14 nov 13, 12:39:04, Craig Miller wrote:
Please add expect-lite package to Squeeze & Wheezy
[...]
Since you will be the Maintainer of the package I think you wanted to
file an ITP (Intent to Package) and not an RFP (Request to package).
Please p
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug #729595 [expect-lite] expect-lite: Please add expect-lite package to
Squeeze & Wheezy
Warning: Unknown package 'expect-lite'
Bug reassigned from package 'expect-lite' to 'wnpp'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #729595 to the same
Hi Ricardo,
I just found your bug report and I have two proposals:
* first, the ko.tex-extra-hlfont should be orphaned, too
* second, I suggest *removing* this package as it is not
required by anyone, and since my last upload of
src:texlive-lang 2013.20131112-1, and uptodate (2013)
version o
29 matches
Mail list logo
