Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the sflphone package.
The package description is:
SFLphone is a SIP/IAX2 compatible softphone for Linux. The SFLphone project's
goal is to create a robust enterprise-class desktop phone. While it can serve
home users very well, it is desi
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the bnfc package.
The package description is:
The BNF Converter is a compiler construction tool that generates a
compiler front-end and a readable syntax description document from a
Labelled BNF grammar. It was originally written to gener
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 448638 ITP: i2p -- I2P is an anonymizing network
Bug #448638 [wnpp] ITP: i2p -- I2P is an anonymizing network, offering a simple
layer that identity-sensitive applications can use to securely
Bug #665450 [wnpp] ITP: i2p -- I2P is an anony
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package wnpp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp'
> # [AUTO] format correction: missing description
> retitle 664595 RFH: php5 --
Bug #664595 [wnpp] RFH: php5
Changed Bug
On 03/24/12 15:24, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Hello,
> I've recently started to package atheme-services and I was wondering
> if I could get some input from you.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/atheme-services
>
> I do plan on making an updated release, perhaps by some time early next
> week at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/12 18:56, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:19:28 -0500, Mike Mestnik
wrote:
>> Thank you for the patch and I approve the change.
>
> Awesome.
>
>> I'm struggling with the init file in regards to bug 508010, but I can do
>> wha
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:19:28 -0500, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Thank you for the patch and I approve the change.
Awesome.
> I'm struggling with the init file in regards to bug 508010, but I can do
> what it seams like every one else is doing and just ignore it.
I am not sure I understand what you ar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #dawgdic (0.4.2-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Initial release (closes: #604253).
> #
> limit package wnpp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp'
> tags 604253 + pend
Hello Daniel,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 02:52:30PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in help. Right now I am preparing improvements in the package.
>
Great, thanks!
Running the ./update-scripts script will be a good starting point to
get the scripts updated before working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/12 18:00, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I would rather get the package into shape and into unstable first, to be
> honest.
>
> Besides, there are more urgent issues to resolve with the current
> package.
>
> According to our tests, there are is on
I would rather get the package into shape and into unstable first, to be
honest.
Besides, there are more urgent issues to resolve with the current
package.
According to our tests, there are is one blocker: the init.d script
doesn't actually compile properly. Here's a patch for that:
--- init.d.o
On 03/25/12 12:08, micah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would be great if you could add the hardening-flags to the
> atheme-services package, as described here:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough
Try it now. There are two problems.
1. I couldn't get hardening=+all to build, but the other option
Hi,
After talking with ron on IRC, I'm withdrawing my request for the
celt051 package.
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 660049 =
Bug #660049 {Done: "Paul R. Tagliamonte" }
[sponsorship-requests] RFS: mosh/0.2.7+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- fast R6RS Scheme
interpreter
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #660049 to the same values
previously se
reopen 660049 =
reopen 631139 =
thanks
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Christine Spang wrote:
> hi David,
>
> As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't
> check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name
> 'mosh', which has now clearned NEW and e
Hi,
I am interested in help. Right now I am preparing improvements in the
package.
I am going to be very attentive for your opinion.
Kind regards
Daniel Echeverry
--
Epsilon
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
http://www.rinconinformatico.net
http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
http://www.dragonj
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 09:15:47PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Christoph Egger writes:
> > Read Policy 5.1 again
>
> Well right, that's devref, clicked on the wrong link but still
Right, the developer's reference isn't policy. Forcing the creation of a
WNPP bug for a package that's already re
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 09:14:42PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Christoph, please
My bad---please excuse my brain's autocompletion; Christopher is a much
more common name in the US.
> There's a RFS from February
I did miss that. I do suspect that the fact that no one has sponsored
that pack
Christoph Egger writes:
> Read Policy 5.1 again
Well right, that's devref, clicked on the wrong link but still
> Assuming no one else is already working on your prospective package,
> you must then submit a bug report (Section 7.1, “Bug reporting”)
> against the pseudo-package wnpp describ
Hi!
Christine Spang writes:
> hi Christopher,
Christoph, please
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 08:22:22PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> The `mosh` you quote reads
>>
>> mosh - Mobile shell that supports roaming and intelligent local echo
>>
>> This is something totaly different from
hi Christopher,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 08:22:22PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The `mosh` you quote reads
>
> mosh - Mobile shell that supports roaming and intelligent local echo
>
> This is something totaly different from
>
> mosh - fast R6RS Scheme interpreter
I propose that t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 631139
Bug #631139 {Done: "Paul R. Tagliamonte" } [wnpp] ITP: mosh
-- fast R6RS Scheme interpreter
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #631139 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Hi!
The `mosh` you quote reads
mosh - Mobile shell that supports roaming and intelligent local echo
This is something totaly different from
mosh - fast R6RS Scheme interpreter
which this bug is about.
Additionally I find it highly inappropriate for someone to take a
package name with an ope
Hi,
It would be great if you could add the hardening-flags to the
atheme-services package, as described here:
http://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough
thanks,
micah
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Unfortunately, the situation at work changed, and I have not
had any time for working on pidgin-openpgp (either the current
codebase or the one that was suggested to me should replace
it, which of course I cannot find the mail for right now) nor
will I probably be wo
Vincent Bernat writes:
> Hi!
>
> Now that XBMC 11.0 has been released, is there any plan to upload the
> current package to unstable?
Otherwise you can install dmo packages :
http://www.debian-multimedia.org/
http://www.debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/x/xbmc-dmo/xbmc-dmo
Christian
--
T
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Boris Pek
* Package name : psi-plus-i18n
* URL : https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n
* License : GPL-2+
Description : translation files for Psi+
There was no translations of Psi+ program except Russian translation.
So I ma
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jakub Wilk
* Package name: y-u-no-validate
Version : 2012032401
Upstream Author : Marcin Szewczyk
* URL :
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/y-u-no-validate/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Hi!
Now that XBMC 11.0 has been released, is there any plan to upload the
current package to unstable?
Thanks.
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im
/*
* Hash table gook..
*/
2.4.0-test2 /usr/src/linux/fs/buffer.c
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.d
29 matches
Mail list logo
