Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I orphan gpgp because I lost interest in it and I don't know how to
port it to gnome2.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are now being exorcised.
--- Satoko Kiyuduki "Kuro the Coffin Bearer"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444704: fixed in ttyrec 1.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
retitle 444704 ITA: ttyrec -- A tty recorder
thanks
I adopt this package.
I have sent two fixes for this package and frustrated that the
previous maintainer was not responsible.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 444704 ITA: ttyrec -- A tty recorder
Bug#444704: O: ttyrec -- A tty recorder
Changed Bug title to `ITA: ttyrec -- A tty recorder' from `O: ttyrec -- A tty
recorder'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
There is a new upstream version, so I'm working to update newbiedoc. :)
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:38 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> reassign 462280 newbiedoc
> retitle 462280 newbiedoc: should this package be removed?
> severity 462280 serious
> thanks
>
> Marc:
> Someone intends to adopt this
reassign 462280 newbiedoc
retitle 462280 newbiedoc: should this package be removed?
severity 462280 serious
thanks
Marc:
Someone intends to adopt this package so IMHO the RM request should be delayed
(but feel free to get it out of testing :).
By the way, you should probably list this kind of th
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:46:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460621: fixed in bmpx 0.40.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 450734 pending
Bug#450734: ITP: stepic -- Python Steganography in Images
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 457373 pending
Bug#457373: ITP: pxsl -- Parsimonious XML Shorthand
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:19:39 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397533: fixed in libwx-perl 0.80-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
I do not have a debian machine directly available for testing,nor i
know how to build debian packages,
but I can help any volunteer in this task.
Version 1.1.0 is almost ready
so if also a debian version would be ready i will be really happy.
Feel free to ask me, (and/or to the meshlab devel
On 2008-01-24 20:50:41 +0100 Ian Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone still working on the meshlab package (and the vcg library) ?
I can do that, I just didn't because there was an ITP and I didn't
want to
do doublework. But since I didn't recieve any reply to my ping, I guess
I'll
PCManFM 0.3.5 beta was released.
This release fixed some old bugs.
About the current status & future plan of the project, please read this.
http://pcmanfm.sourceforge.net/plan.html
Hello!
On 1/24/08, Christopher James Halse Rogers (RAOF)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the progress of this ITP? Apart from the lack of license
> headers in any of the source files, it seems a simple enough packaging
> task, although I note that there have been a couple of upstream release
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> submitter 336974 !
Bug#336974: ITA: newbiedoc -- Documentation by and for newbies
Changed Bug submitter from Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Frank
Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTE
Is anyone still working on the meshlab package (and the vcg library) ?
I have a use for it and hoped to find a package, or failing that I
might try to put one together myself.
How far has anyone got ? Any information or pointers would be
valuable.
I found this:
http://gnu.ethz.ch/debian/meshl
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Hi Hubert,
On Do, 24 Jan 2008, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> Asymptote uses animate.sty for creating animations, so it would be nice
> to have animate.sty in Debian. It should be a low-maintenance package.
TeX Live 2008 will ship animate.sty. I guess we can wait for that.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: animate.sty
Version :
Upstream Author : Alexander Grahn
* URL or Web page :
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/animate/
* License : LPPL
Description : Create PDF animations from graphics files and in
What is the progress of this ITP? Apart from the lack of license
headers in any of the source files, it seems a simple enough packaging
task, although I note that there have been a couple of upstream releases
since you created your packages.
I can help, or take over, if you like.
signature.asc
34 matches
Mail list logo
