OK, I've built and connected to the Second Life server using the
latest FirstLook linden slviewer release (1.13.3.59315).
The opensl viewer from openmetaverse.org claimed to be too old to
connect to the server, so for the moment I'll be packaging the
linden version.
Source package will be slviewe
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 17:44 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> I'm suggesting either. I'm happy to maintain the package seperately, but
> I intend to go through the differences between the versions and confirm
> that they are compatible, and steal anything good from the php-bundled
> version, so in
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:56:42PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 17:44 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> I'm suggesting either. I'm happy to maintain the package seperately, but
>> I intend to go through the differences between the versions and confirm
>> that they are compati
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 06:19:09PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> hi paul,
> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 03:05 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> Would there be any interest in having PHP5 link its xmlrpc extension
>> against a distinct library packaging of xmlrpc-epi? (ie. to avoid
>> the situation which
hi paul,
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 03:05 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Would there be any interest in having PHP5 link its xmlrpc extension
> against a distinct library packaging of xmlrpc-epi? (ie. to avoid
> the situation which once existed for zlib being statically compiled
> into various othe
(For the php-maint team. I've just ITP'd xmlrpc-epi as a dependancy
of the second-life client, and was poking around to see if there was
a good way of not having to package it.)
Interestingly, the code in ext/xmlrpc/libxmlrpc in the php5 5.2.0
tarball is a derivative of xmlrpc-epi. A quick check o
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:56:42PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 17:44 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> I'm suggesting either. I'm happy to maintain the package seperately, but
>> I intend to go through the differences between the versions and confirm
>> that they are compati
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi,
>> I have preliminary 1.1 packages which I need to update to 1.1.1, and
>> once I've done that I'll be seeking a sponsor on debian-mentors unless
>> I am approached beforehand. (hint hint ^_^)
>> I'm packaging this as a dependanc
There are LiVES .debs now at debian-multimedia.org.
All that is required is for somebody to copy these packages into the
main debian repositories.
Salsaman.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 390380 pending
Bug#390380: ITP: python-galago -- Galago presence library (Python interface)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 390381 pending
Bug#390381: ITP: python-galago-g
hello, I am pretty russian girl, bored tonight.
would you like to chat with me and see my pics?
if so then email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libnet-dpap-server
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : n/a
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DPAP-Server/
* License : Perl (Artistic and GPL)
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Perl module that provi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 406354 O: boa -- Lightweight and high performance web server
Bug#406354: ITA: boa -- Lightweight and high performance web server
Changed Bug title to O: boa -- Lightweight and high performance web server from
ITA: boa -- Lightweight and high pe
Hi,
> I have preliminary 1.1 packages which I need to update to 1.1.1, and
> once I've done that I'll be seeking a sponsor on debian-mentors unless
> I am approached beforehand. (hint hint ^_^)
>
> I'm packaging this as a dependancy of secondlife-client
>
I'd appreciate a packaging and uploading
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#406508: fixed in gtans 1.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
I posted this RFP because there is a nw upstream version available
(6.3.3). If I posted it wrong, please tell me.
On 3/18/07, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#415157: RFP: imagemagick -- ImageMagick 6.3.3,
which wa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: affinity
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Neil J. Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/affinity-search/
* License : GPL v2 or later
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package name: libapache2-mod-wsgi
Version : presently unreleased
Upstream Author : Graham Dumpleton
URL : http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/
License : Apache License 2.0
Progr
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:05:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing old RFP bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:03:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing old ITP bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: libinotify-ruby
Version : 0.0.0
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/ruby-inotify/
License : Ruby's dual license (either GPL or R
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:56:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing old ITP bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:59:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing old ITP bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:00:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing old ITP bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:58:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing old ITP bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:57:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package removed, closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Bart Martens a écrit :
Hi Raphaël,
How is progress with packaging "yersinia" for Debian? Are you still
working on this?
Hi Bart,
in fact I had something prepared a long time ago but never
get sastisfied with it. I was totally stalled on this and have been
crying at myself each week for th
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 17:30 +0530, Deepak Kumar Tripathi wrote:
>
> Hi ,
> I am looking sponsor for libtie-cache-perl 0.17-3
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libtie-cache-perl
I'll sponsor this package, and I'll contact Deepak Kumar Tripathi via
private e-mail.
Regards,
Bart M
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #ITP without owner
> owner 263261 Sebastian Dröge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#263261: ITP: marlin -- A GNOME sample editor
Owner recorded as Sebastian Dröge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> #missing package name
> retitle 315229 ITP: nautilus-share -- A quick and
Hi all,
I just wanted to draw your attention to loggerhead [1].
I don't know bazaar-webserve well enough and also played only a little
with loggerhead, so I can't make a fair comparison.
Might be interesting for bzr.debian.org though.
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://www.lag.net/loggerhead/
--
Why
On (18/03/07 13:06), Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to draw your attention to loggerhead [1].
> I don't know bazaar-webserve well enough and also played only a little
> with loggerhead, so I can't make a fair comparison.
>
> Might be interesting for bzr.debian.org though.
>
Hi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: qdevelop
Version : 0.21
Upstream Author : Jean-Luc Biord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://qdevelop.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : QDevelop is a development environment entirely
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 413857 pending
Bug#413857: ITP: isomaster -- A graphical ISO image editor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
33 matches
Mail list logo
