The licensing "bug" described in the last message was fixed in version 1.24.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-chardet
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Mark Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://chardet.feedparser.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obvio
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:09:53 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391411: fixed in libgtk-trayicon-ruby 0.1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
I have dug even deeper in the source code of Prayer, added IPv6 support, got a
reply from upstream maintainer David Carter, and thought about it. The
question is: Will the (additional) effort needed to produce and maintain a
Debian package of good enough quality be worth it, considering the foll
Package: wnpp
Allright,
My issue beeing that after I started to take care of my package, I had very bad
personal issues, which had me stop temporarily take care of the package.
Then, when I was able again to take care of the package, my mentor didn't care
anymore about me or this. I sent correct
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bouthenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dudki
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Klever Group (http://www.klever.net/)
* URL : http://kin.klever.net/dudki/
* License : MIT/X like
Programming Lang: C++
Des
Thank you for taking care about packaing jbidwatcher
> I have managed to remove some part that were not necessary, but there is
> still
> a Regex class that is needed.
> claims that the licence is the Lesser Gnu Public License, the source lacks
> some classes source, in particular in some Unico
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 208073
Bug#208073: ITP: libqglviewer -- Library for rapid 3D application development
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks bts
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 00 pending
Bug number 00 not found. (Is it archived?)
> tags 326295 pending
Bug#326295: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: pending
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: policyd-weight
Version : 0.1.14-beta
Upstream Author : Robert Felber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.policyd-weight.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Descr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 249275
Bug#249275: ITP: wxhaskell -- Haskell binding for wxWidgets.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks bts
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Scripsit Thijs Kinkhorst
> Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think
> it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions,
> especially from the maintainers?
Go ahead. As the last active maintainer, I have been meaning to file
for removal for some t
reassign 321693 ftp.debian.org
retitle 321693 RM: vaiostat -- RoM; RC-buggy, no maintainer, inactive upstream
thanks
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 05:26 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> No skin off my nose. Feel free.
Ok, doing so (and labeling RoM seems appropriate).
thanks,
Thijs
signature.asc
Descrip
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 337498
Bug#337498: ITP: unidesc -- Unicode Description Utilities consists of four
programs for finding out what is in a Unicode file.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks bts!
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> --
S
wxhaskell just had a change of management, so I'm still holding out, in
hope that someone will soon package it for debian, probably not in time for
etch, but soon...
--
David Roundy
Dept. of Physics
Oregon State University
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 321693 ftp.debian.org
Bug#321693: RFA: vaiostat -- kernel module for Sony Vaio laptops
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 321693 RM: vaiostat -- RoM; RC-buggy, no maintainer, inactive upstream
Bug#321693: RFA: va
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The vaiostat package:
>
> * Is not in testing;
> * Is RC-buggy;
> * Has been up for adoption for well over a year;
> * Is inactive upstream.
>
> Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think
Hi all,
The vaiostat package:
* Is not in testing;
* Is RC-buggy;
* Has been up for adoption for well over a year;
* Is inactive upstream.
Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think
it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions,
especially from
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:59:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pydot
Version : 0.9.10
Upstream Author : Ero Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dkbza.org/pydot.html
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm a lisper from Chinese, and I'm going to adopt this package, if no one do
this.
Thanks.
--
'()
pgpH2t6H7JyGB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:18:01 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335698: fixed in libxml-ruby 0.3.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
I installed it "by hand" (no .deb yet) ; it really
does work; what I am a tad afraid of is that it seems that
ocr sw suffers from many buffer-overflow, so this package may
become a vector attak
so I will need to investigate before submitting a .deb
a.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21~bpo.1
> retitle 364615 RFA: qpopper -- Enhanced Post Office Protocol server (POP3)
Bug#364615: ITA: qpopper -- Enhanced Post Office Protocol server
Changed Bug title.
> noowner 364615
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
Please, refer to this discussion.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/11/msg00073.html
--
With best regards,
Andy Shevchenko. mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bouthenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kio-apt
Version : 0.13.1
Upstream Author : Sylvain Joyeux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://lpnotfr.free.fr/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fuzzyocr
Version : 2.3b
Upstream Author : Christian Holler, decoder_at_own-hero_dot_net
* URL : http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD,
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:48:18AM +0200, andy shevchenko wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Andy Shevchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: renrot
> Version : 0.25
> Upstream Author : Zeus Panchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Shevchenko
> <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 390827 ITA: libnids -- IP defragmentation TCP segment reassembly
> library
Bug#390827: O: libnids -- IP defragmentation TCP segment reassembly library
Changed Bug title.
> owner 390827 !
Bug#390827: ITA: libnids -- IP defragmentation TCP segme
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:33:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387771: fixed in gcc-h8300-hms 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 283299 pending
Bug#283299: ITP: gambc -- Gambit-C Scheme Interpreter and Compiler
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 335699 pending
Bug#335699: ITA: libxslt-ruby -- Ruby inte
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andy Shevchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: renrot
Version : 0.25
Upstream Author : Zeus Panchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Shevchenko <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/renrot/
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: remotedesk.app
Version : 0.1
Upstream Authors : Riccardo Mottola
* URL : http://gap.nongnu.org/remotedesk/
* License : GNU GPL
Description : Remote Windows access tool
This is a graphical interface to rdesktop
56 matches
Mail list logo
