Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 326524
Bug#326524: RFP: depinit -- radical and really cool replacement for /sbin/init
- and initscripts!
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks bts
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle #347571 ITA: xtalk -- BSD talk compatible X Window System client.
Bug#347571: O: xtalk -- BSD talk compatible X Window System client.
Changed Bug title.
> owner #347571 Luis Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#347571: ITA: xtalk -- BSD talk compatibl
Hi Wnpp!
Gianluca Zambrotta si ribella: "Non sono un traditore" Cori da stadio per
Berlusconi al meeting di Rimini Iran, le cancellerie prendono tempo dopo la
risposta
http://www.geocities.com/cash774156841
Zucchero/ A Termoli sciopero della fame per difendere lo zuccherificio
--
To UNSU
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 01:33:47PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Guido Guenther wrote:
>
> > Description : powerful extensions to python's standard datetime module
> >...
>
> If I understand the description correctly it might be a replacement
> for python-egenix-mxdatetime
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-xattr
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://svn.red-bean.com/bob/xattr/releases/xattr-0.2/
* License : MIT/PSF
Programmi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 326945
Bug#326945: ITP: shorten -- tool for fast compression of waveform files
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 326691
Bug#326691: ITP: freebob -- FreeBoB aims to provide a free driver implemenation
for the BeBob
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks bts
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
reopen 326945
thanks
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:59:35AM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or
> are involved with.
Don't do that. This bug is still valid, and I still plan to upload, I
just haven't done it yet. At least ping maint
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:34 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:35 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:34 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:35 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:34 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:50 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:35 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:35 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:34 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:35 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:50 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:36 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:35 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:59:50 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> retitle 290350 O: wmakerconf -- GTK+ based configuration tool for Window Maker
Bug#290350: RFA: wmakerconf -- GTK+ based configuration tool for Window Maker
Changed Bug title.
> reti
Hi all,
Since I no longer really use Window Maker much, I am orphaning the
wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages (cf. the CC'ed bugs). I've just
emailed the BTS to retitle those bugs from RFA to O, and uploaded new
packages with the maintainer set to Debian QA Group. Note that each of
these is
On 9/8/06, Hendrik-Jan Heins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This version of Seamonkey runs entirely on xulrunner.
Two comments (without having run it) :
(1) SM 1.0.x from mozilla.org isn't designed for XULRunner.
(2) There is a project to make SM trunk run on XULRunner. It's called
"suiterunner",
Jimmy Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess i didnt phrase my initial mail too well, but yes openib2 in the
> vanilla kernel + lustre it is something I would like to test. though we havent
> sucessfully gotten openib2 to work correctly on our compute systems so
> we havent looked at lustre +
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 368734 ITP: libnet-amazon-s3-perl -- Perl library for using the
> Amazon's Simple Storage Service API
Bug#368734: ITP: libnet-amazon-s3-perl - Perl library for using the
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Hello I keep trying to build new and better versions of this one.
I read up on some of the xulrunner stuff Mike suggested, and I
implemented it in this version.
This version of Seamonkey runs entirely on xulrunner.
I do still have some problems with:
- lintians
- menu entries (it shows up in the d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libnet-lite-ftp-perl
Version : 0.47
Upstream Author : Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~eyck/Net-Lite-FTP-0.47/lib/Net/Lite/FTP.pm
* License
Hi Goswin,
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:34:40PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
> >> The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives some tests such as
> >> bonnie, etc.
> >> but hangs in large workloads: I'm debugging this, but would prefer to
> >> target 2.6.17 for Etch.
> >> (even
Jimmy Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Alastair,
>
>> The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives some tests such as
>> bonnie, etc.
>> but hangs in large workloads: I'm debugging this, but would prefer to
>> target 2.6.17 for Etch.
>> (even if we don't get in the Etch release, I
retitle 368734 ITP: libnet-amazon-s3-perl - Perl library for using the
Amazon's Simple Storage Service API
thanks
I itent to package that Perl library as backup-manager can use it (and
thus, should suggest that package).
Alexis.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 368734 ITP: libnet-amazon-s3-perl - Perl library for using the
Bug#368734: RFP: libnet-amazon-s3-perl -- Perl library for using the Amazon's
Simple Storage Service API
Changed Bug title.
> Amazon's Simple Storage Service API
Unknown command or
Hi Alastair,
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 01:24:44PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> >
> None at the moment; we've a small test cluster that had driver issues up
> to 2.6.17, and so i'm trying out 2.6.17.
ah okay, i think i know the problem you may be refering (to the e326
sata disks and control
Jimmy Tang wrote:
> Hi Alastair,
>
>
>> The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives some tests such as
>> bonnie, etc.
>> but hangs in large workloads: I'm debugging this, but would prefer to
>> target 2.6.17 for Etch.
>> (even if we don't get in the Etch release, I'd like to suppor
Hi Alastair,
> The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives some tests such as
> bonnie, etc.
> but hangs in large workloads: I'm debugging this, but would prefer to
> target 2.6.17 for Etch.
> (even if we don't get in the Etch release, I'd like to support the
> stable kernel.) Some p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #ITP without owner
> owner 326114 Gurkan Sengun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#326114: ITP: lostlabyrinth -- roquelike roleplaying computer game
Owner recorded as Gurkan Sengun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> #wrong package name, ITP and RFP for the same package
> ret
37 matches
Mail list logo
