On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:21:31 +0900 (JST), I wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:43:17 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
>
> > Current SVN is better. ;-)
>
> I see, I'll try it later.
>From curiosity, I've packaged xetex 0.995 (and xdvipdfmx 0.3) for
Debian/unstable. (I don't mean to maintain it though.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 355353 most: Glitch in tab expansion
Bug#355353: RFP: appweb -- very fast, small-footprint, standards based server,
dedicated for embedded systems
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
> retitle 353353 RFP: app
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> noowner 353353
Bug#353353: ITP: appweb -- very fast, small-footprint, standards based server,
dedicated for embedded systems
Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> retitle 355353 RFP: appweb -- very fast, small-foo
Kari,
Thanks for your detailed response.
Comments below
> -Original Message-
> From: Kari Pahula [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 4:30 PM
> To: mob
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-legal@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Licensing problems with appWeb
>
> I felt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: keytouch-editor
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Marvin Raaijmakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://keytouch.sourceforge.net/index.html
License : GPL
reassign 301754 ftp.debian.org
retitle 301754 RM: scoop; RoQA/RoM -- very few users, orphaned since Mar 2005,
out of date wrt upstream, etc.
thanks
Popcon: 6 installs, 1 vote.
The maintainer suggested removing it *back in March 2005* when he orphaned it.
I think he was right.
The Debian package
On (25/08/06 01:20), Nico Golde wrote:
> > Btw, I have removed my current weplab package from mentors
> > to reupload a fixed release but dupload say me the package
> > is already present on mentors ftp ?!?!?
> >
> > How can I reupload it ?
>
> I dont know if there are any special package trea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 301754 ftp.debian.org
Bug#301754: O: scoop -- Web-based collaborative media application
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 301754 RM: scoop; RoQA/RoM -- very few users, orphaned since Mar
> 2005, out of date wrt
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:21:29PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:19:50PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote:
>
> > This library includes simple facilities (not ansi C, thus not included
> > in the lua standard library) like directory listing and file locking.
>
> Neat library. A
I felt that it would be better to bring this to debian-legal. For
reference, this is about AppWeb, http://www.appwebserver.org/.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:52:07AM -0700, mob wrote:
> I wanted to follow up and make sure you received my responses to your email.
I did. Sorry, I've been deferring
Hi,
* =?UTF-8?Q?Adam=20C=C3=A9cile=20 =20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-25 00:53]:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:05:23 +0200, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Adam Cécile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-24 18:52]:
> >> * Package name: weplab
> >> Version : 0.1.5
[...]
> > I tried t
hi,
can i help in this package please ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: O: d4x -- graphical download manager
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
hi,
can i help you in this pakage ?!
The package description is:
Downloader for X is a powerful graphical download manager.
It supports both HTTP(S) and FTP protocols and
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:20:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306902: fixed in ltsp-utils 0.25-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gnome-main-menu
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Dan Winship, Jim Krehl, JP Rosevear,
Scott Reeves (Novell)
* URL : No website. Included in Gnome CVS
* Lic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: agave
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Jonathon Quotidian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://home.gna.org/colorscheme/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A colorscheme designer for the g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gaffitter
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Douglas A. Augusto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gaffitter.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C+
On 23-Aug-06, 17:48 (CDT), Pierre-Alexandre Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Package name: rash
> Version : 1.2.2
> Upstream Author : Tom Cuchta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rqms/
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lang: PHP
>
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:19:50PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> This library includes simple facilities (not ansi C, thus not included
> in the lua standard library) like directory listing and file locking.
Neat library. Almost the same as mine!
http://www.steve.org.uk/Software/lua-fs/doc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package wnpp
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wnpp
> owner 306902 !
Bug#306902: O: ltsp-utils -- Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP)
administration utilities
Owner recorded as "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> retitle 306902 ITA: ltsp-utils
Hi,
> Isn't it necessary that NEON's author adds the same exception clause
> to his license? Or is this no problem because he chose the LGPL?
Yes, that's no problem because he chose the LGPL.
> Adding the following sentence to LICENSE is all that is required on my side,
> right?
[...]
Yes.
> U
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:40 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:27 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:27 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:40 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
This is a corrected ITP for the fields Upstream Author and URL:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dynagen
Version : 0.4.3
Upstream Author : Greg Anuzelli ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/dyna-gen
* License : GPL
Desc
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:27 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:40 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 379147 by 384494
Bug#379147: ITP: fusedav -- userspace file system driver for mounting WebDAV
shares
Was blocked by: 369325 369540
Blocking bugs of 379147 added: 384494
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:40 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:27 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:40 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: luaexpat
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : oberto Ierusalimschy, André Carregal and Tomás
Guisasola as part of the Kepler Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.keplerpro
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:39 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:27 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:59:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381221: fixed in deb-gview 0.0.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:50:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323689: fixed in op-panel 0.26.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Hello Adam,
* Adam Cécile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-24 18:52]:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: weplab
> Version : 0.1.5
> Upstream Author : Jose Ignacio Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:04:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383609: fixed in pgfouine 0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
This is a corrected ITP with correct Upstream Author and Licence fields:
ackage: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dynamips
Version : 0.2.4-0.2.5RC2
Upstream Author : Fabien Devaux, Christophe Fillot, MtvE
* URL : http://www.ipf
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:04:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383609: fixed in pgfouine 0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:53:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381201: fixed in reniced 1.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Thu, 24.08.06 17:59, Sebastian Harl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
Hi!
> fusedav is linking against SSL (by using neon). As fusedav is licensed under
> the GPL I'm not allowed to link it against OpenSSL unless you explicitly allow
> me to do so in your README file (see [1]). Would y
I wanted to follow up and make sure you received my responses to your email.
We are definitely interested in resolving these so we can be included in
debian releases:
Anyway comments below:
> -Original Message-
> From: Kari Pahula [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:57:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311373: fixed in wifi-radar 1.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379548: fixed in subtitleeditor 0.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi Lennart,
fusedav is linking against SSL (by using neon). As fusedav is licensed under
the GPL I'm not allowed to link it against OpenSSL unless you explicitly allow
me to do so in your README file (see [1]). Would you please be so kind to add
an appropriate paragraph to your README file or do y
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: weplab
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Jose Ignacio Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://weplab.sourceforge.net/
*
Patrick Ruckstuhl wrote:
> I'd like to help with this package.
> I'm working at ISE at the moment which may help with some problems.
Jup, I know.. will follow-up with some things on the mailinglist soon
(about a week i think).
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberi
Hi
At the moment I can't seem to find a deb for clamassassin anywhere
anymore but I came accross this bug report.
It is today (August 24 2006) 519 days in preparation, the latest
activity on this bug report dates back to February this year.
Is there anything I can do to help getting clamassassin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: virt-manager
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Daniel P. Berrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://virt-manager.et.redhat.com/
* License : GNU General Public Li
51 matches
Mail list logo
