Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 284225 ITP: gurlchecker -- graphical web link checker
Bug#284225: RFP: gurlchecker -- graphical web link checker
Changed Bug title.
> merge 284225 187423
Bug#187423: ITP: gurlchecker -- URL checker for GNOME2
Bug#284225: ITP: gurlchecker -- gra
Alert, This is your Second Notification:
Thank you for your recent inquiry, we have been notified that two lenders are
interested in offering you a deal. Remember, for this special offer past
credit history is not a factor.
In accordance with our terms please verify your information on our se
Hey Martin,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:04:25AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #240587: ITP: ufsutils -- utilities for the UFS filesystem,
> which was filed against the wnpp package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the deve
* Matthias Urlichs [Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:46:45 +0100]:
> Hi, Adam M. wrote:
> > Thus, libevelution-ruby doesn't need to depend on Ruby. It only needs to
> > depend on evolution.
> What happens if/when ruby is updated in a non-binary-compatible way?
> Or if/when somebody decides to remove ruby sinc
Hi, Adam M. wrote:
> Thus, libevelution-ruby doesn't need to depend on Ruby. It only needs to
> depend on evolution.
What happens if/when ruby is updated in a non-binary-compatible way?
Or if/when somebody decides to remove ruby since, after all, nothing
depends on it?
If that happens, you have
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 05:45 +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While cleaning up the BTS wnpp entries I found that you want to package
> gurlchecker, for which
> there's filed an ITP (#187423) and a RFP (#284225).
>
> Please tell me your intentions about the package so I can handle the
> du
David Moreno Garza wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 17:31 +, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>
>>Scripsit David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Revolution is a little Ruby binding to the excellent Evolution email
>>>client.
>>>
>>>
>>Is it so little that it would be better to in
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:51:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#284219: fixed in gnu-standards 2005.03.08
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 17:31 +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Revolution is a little Ruby binding to the excellent Evolution email
> > client.
>
> Is it so little that it would be better to include it with the
> evolution package?
Not quite sur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 290676 + fixed
Bug#290676: ITP: libapache2-mod-auth-kerb -- Apache2 module to authenticate
connections using Kerberos
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:25:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286105: fixed in pngwriter 0.5.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 203211 ITP: avidemux -- A video editing software
Bug#203211: RFP: avidemux -- A small editing software for avi (especially DivX)
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:03:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266777: fixed in zope-quotafolder 0.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:21:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294818: fixed in haskelldb 0.9.cvs.601-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:10:42 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278689: fixed in gjots2 2.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:25:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298227: fixed in maildirsync 1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:48:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290421: fixed in zeiberbude 2.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
* Package name: mutt-ng
Version : rev-231
Upstream Author : Andreas Krennmair
* URL : http://www.muttng.org
* License : GPL
Description : Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known
email client mutt
(Include the long description here.)
Mu
* Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 22:09]:
> > This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
> > since then moved to unstable.
>
> xkeyboard-config is still in experimental. That said, I am happy with
> this bug being closed because packages from experimental
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:05:04AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #274299: ITP: xkeyboard-config -- X Keyboard Extension configuration files,
> which was filed against the wnpp package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Peeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: achims-guestbook
Version : 2.52
Upstream Author : Achim Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.lkcc.org:8500/
* License : GPL
Description : php driven guestboo
Hello
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 05:33:43PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: apt-rpm
> Version : 0.5.15cnc6
> Upstream Author : Gustavo Niemeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Scripsit David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Revolution is a little Ruby binding to the excellent Evolution email
> client.
Is it so little that it would be better to include it with the
evolution package?
--
Henning Makholm "Al lykken er i ét ord: Overvægtig!"
Newest penis enlargement system:
-Increases the penis length and girth
-Medically Proven (source: wikipedia)
-No Surgery
-Permanent Results
-Proven Traction Method
-100% Satisfaction Guaranteed
Find more info here:
http://www.m0re.net/e/viks
you musicology me boutique me you commo
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:53:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package entered debian.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 the mental interface of
Paul Hampson told:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:53:38PM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > Elimar Riesebieter:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > * Package name: mutt-ng
>
> > Also n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 260613
Bug#260613: ITP: kexi -- tool for manipulating database objects in KDE3
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
* Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 14:36]:
> > This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package
> > has since then moved to unstable.
>
> One question: why was it moved to unstable without any hint against
> the maintainer ?
No, sorry, my message was wrong. It is sti
On Thursday 24 March 2005 12:04, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[...]
> Sender: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 267277
Bug#267277: ITP: ekg2 -- an Instant Messenger with a plugin structure
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 257274 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#257274: ITP: clanlib0.7 -- multi-platform game SDK (development version)
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental
> tags 257274 pending
Bug#257274: ITP: clanlib0.7 -- multi-platform game SDK (develo
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:03:02AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
>
> > Same problem here. Reported to Norbert but never got deeper into it.
> > Let's try renaming mutt_dotlock to muttng_dotlock ;)
>
> I did that after your report a while ago, and my last package[0]
> includes muttng_dotlock
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 257274 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#257274: ITP: clanlib0.7 -- multi-platform game SDK (development version)
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental
Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental
> tags 257274 + pending
Bug#257274: ITP: clanlib0.7 -- multi-platform
* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 13:01]:
> > This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
> > since then moved to unstable.
>
> If so, that move was done without consulting and giving any
> information about this to the maintainer. The upload went to
Yeah, the
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:55:56AM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
> since then moved to unstable.
If so, that move was done without consulting and giving any
information about this to the maintainer. The upload went to
experim
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 257274
Bug#257274: ITP: clanlib0.7 -- multi-platform game SDK (development version)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags - fixed-in-experimental
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags pending
Unknown command or malfor
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
> since then moved to unstable.
I doubt that, too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
> since then moved to unstable.
I doubt that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 12:07]:
> * Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 13:01]:
> > > This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
> > > since then moved to unstable.
> > I doubt that, too.
>
> yeah, the message is wrong (I'll fix this), but the
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 13:01]:
> > This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
> > since then moved to unstable.
> I doubt that.
Yeah, the message is wrong (I'll fix this), but the bug should be
closed anyway since the package is in the archive
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 13:01]:
> > This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
> > since then moved to unstable.
> I doubt that, too.
yeah, the message is wrong (I'll fix this), but the bug should be
closed anyway since the package is in the ar
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:54:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package exists in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:55:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:55:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
* Mohammed Adnène Trojette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-23 22:41]:
> > uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please
> tag was fixed-in-experimental.
Thanks for pointing this out. My script didn't handle this situation.
It does now.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cy
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:55:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:55:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:55:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please close WNPP bugs properly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:55:58 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:56:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
* Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > On the other hand, I'm having a problem with the package, it
> > doesn't include muttng_dotlock, and seems to think my mailspool
> > (mbox in /var/mail) is read-only. (vanilla) Mutt can use it fine.
>
> Same
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:39:04AM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > On the other hand, I'm having a problem with the package, it
> > doesn't include muttng_dotlock, and seems to think my mailspool
> > (mbox in /var/mail) is read-only. (
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:47:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273703: fixed in gfslicer 1.5.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
65 matches
Mail list logo
