On 03/17/2005 01:25 AM, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:58:28PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
* Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-28 09:53]:
Have you heard back from the Alioth admins yet?
no :(
Any more luck?
The project is up, the list is up, but we are still waiting for Alio
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:58:28PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-28 09:53]:
> > Have you heard back from the Alioth admins yet?
>
> no :(
Any more luck?
--
gram
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: coils
Version : no version
Upstream Author : Rob Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.russell.embl.de/cgi-bin/coils-svr.pl
* License : GPL
Description : [Biology] prediction of coiled coil seconda
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
These are PostScript Type1 renderings and TFMs of the EC variants
of the standard TeX CMR font family. These fonts include characters
with European accents.
This package is necessary for packaging newer versions of lilypond.
http://lilypond.org/download/fonts.
Sorry for the late reply. I'd like to sponsor these package.
Before that, a few things to mention:
Per the policy 3.4.1, the synopsis line (which is the first line of
Description) should be kept brief, under 80 characters
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-synopsis
Please
Hi,
We will be deploying shtoom in my company and could help you out
with the shtoom package in case you need it. Any news on that front ?
--
Nicolas Chauvat
logilab.fr - services en informatique avancée et gestion de connaissances
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-beautifulsoup
Version : 1.2+cvs20041017
Upstream Author : Leonard Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/
* License : P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-mpdclient
Version : 0.10.0
Upstream Author : Nick Welch
* URL : http://www.musicpd.org/py-libmpdclient.shtml
* License : LGPL
Description : Python interface
Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:28:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line uploaded done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:28:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line uploaded done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 297922 ITA: pyzor -- spam-catcher using a collaborative
Bug#297922: O: pyzor -- spam-catcher using a collaborative filtering network
Changed Bug title.
> filtering network
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> owner 297922 !
Bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
retitle 298434 RFP: gate - gather text input with word-wrapping
severity 298434 wishlist
thanks
While gate isn't actually in Debian yet, it does look like it could have
some promise for system scripts that require a user to edit a text file
as it is jus
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 298434 RFP: gate - gather text input with word-wrapping
Bug#298434: RFA: gate - A text-gatherer
Changed Bug title.
> severity 298434 wishlist
Bug#298434: RFP: gate - gather text input with word-wrapping
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Sto
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Miros/law Baran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > The font is included in the tetex-base package, along with other Type1
> > GUST-sponsored fonts (Antykwa Toru?ska etc.) - I think such a package
> > will be redundant.
>
> Well, tetex-base only has the afm
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:04:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282297: fixed in jed 0.99.16-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
**RESEARCH NOTICE**
ALERT! - A member at our website is sharing experiences and opinions about you
at our website.
Why did we send you this email?
When people find out others are talking about them, whether it is good or bad,
they usually want to know. We feel that is is our responsibility to
http://sofnqn.info/in.php?aid=104
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:40:33 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Since I do care about dpatch, and I do use it a lot in my packages,
>I will be willing to help out / adopt this package.
After organizing on IRC, Junichi and I will take over the package.
Gergely has agreed, and an uplo
http://sofnqn.info/in.php?aid=104
Hi,
You have previously done some work on the pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7} packages
(previously simh-unix-images) - is there any value in keeping them?
Kevin has recently orphaned these packages, they're non-free, and -
according to popcon - barely anybody uses them. So I was going to file for
removal
[This is a copy of a mail sent to debian-devel]
Miros/law Baran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> 16.03.2005 pisze Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> * Package name: ttf-antp
>> Version : 0.51
>> Upstream Author : Bogus?aw Jackowski, Janusz M. Nowacki and Piotr
>> Strzelczyk
>
hi Dave,
As you might know, your auth-ldap module is part of Debian. Sadly, the
Maintainer orphaned the package one year ago. Looking at your Page,
one might consider the Project be dead, since there has been no new
release in 3 years.
Are you still interested in developing the Module? I saw you
http://sofnqn.info/in.php?aid=104
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:33:06PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> [removing pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7}]
>
> On Saturday 12 March 2005 00.00, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > prefereably by first mailing this to the
> > wnpp bugs,
>
> Not clear what you mean here - first just suggest
Hi,
> >retitle 264567 RFA: dpatch -- patch maintenance system for Debian source
> >packages
> >thanks
> >
> >I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore,
> >so a new maintainer is probably justified, to say the least.
> >
> >You might consider this an O:, even. It is o
Hi Jeroen,
[removing pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7}]
On Saturday 12 March 2005 00.00, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Please don't file a new bug for this, but rather retitle and reassign
> the wnpp bugs appropriately,
Ok, shame on me, should've read the docs
> prefereably by first mailing this to the
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-enchant
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Ryan Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pyenchant.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL with a special exception to link
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:06:03PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: ttf-antp
The name implies that you will only include the ttf but not the type1
fonts. Adding the type1 fonts as well and making the
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:32:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298368: fixed in spamprobe 1.0a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 299771 patch
Bug#299771: ITP: ttf-antp -- Antykwa Poltawskiego font family
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ttf-antp
Version : 0.51
Upstream Author : Bogus³aw Jackowski, Janusz M. Nowacki and Piotr Strzelczyk
* URL : http://www.janusz.nowacki.strefa.pl/poltawski-e.html
* License
> * Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-16 09:50]:
> > I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore,
>
> Out of interest, what are you using now?
Most of the time, nothing, as I'm upstream for pretty much everything I
have in Debian.
For packages crated for $WORK,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:50:36 +0100, Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>retitle 264567 RFA: dpatch -- patch maintenance system for Debian source
>packages
>thanks
>
>I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore,
>so a new maintainer is probably justified, to say the
* Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-16 09:50]:
> I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore,
Out of interest, what are you using now?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
retitle 264567 RFA: dpatch -- patch maintenance system for Debian source
packages
thanks
I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore,
so a new maintainer is probably justified, to say the least.
You might consider this an O:, even. It is only RFA, because I do not
want
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 264567 RFA: dpatch -- patch maintenance system for Debian source
> packages
Bug#264567: RFH: dpatch -- patch maintenance system for Debian source packages
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
36 matches
Mail list logo
