Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # clean up after previous mess-up :-)
> retitle 280209 ITP: codeville -- More anarchic revision control system
> [non-free]
Bug#280209: auto.master "+" syntax doesn't support options
Changed Bug title.
> tags 280209 - patch
Bug#280209: ITP: codeville
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 259587 !
Bug#259587: ITA: libquantum-entanglement-perl -- Quantum Mechanic entanglement
of variables in perl
Owner recorded as Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
tags 278229 -wontfix
severity 280209 normal
severity 278229 normal
retitle 280209 auto.master "+" syntax doesn't support options
merge 280209 278229
tags 280209 + patch
thanks
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:56:03AM +0200, Anders Boström wrote:
> It still seems to be a documented feature to pass option
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 278229 -wontfix
Bug#278229: auto.master "+" syntax doesn't support options
Tags were: wontfix
Tags removed: wontfix
> severity 280209 normal
Bug#280209: ITP: codeville -- More anarchic revision control system [non-free]
Severity set to `normal'.
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 18:02:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275777: fixed in nwall 1.32-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On 10131 March 1977, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> You don't want to use this if you only have a few hundred packages
>> to maintain. Look at mini-dinstall or debarchiver or maybe even
>> apt-ftparchive for this.
> Mirrorer (alioth project) is another one worth looking at.
Make a deb out of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 259587 ITA: libquantum-entanglement-perl -- Quantum Mechanic
> entanglement of variables in perl
Bug#259587: O: libquantum-entanglement-perl -- Quantum Mechanic entanglement of
variables in perl
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping p
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the obexftp package. Uusal reasons, no time, no
motivation, going to replace the relevant hardware soon.
The package description is:
Application to access the Flex.Memory on Siemens GSM Mobiles
via the OBEX Protocol over IrDA or Serial link, may
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dpkg-reversion
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://madduck.net/~madduck/scratch/dpkg-reversion
* License : Artistic
Description : change the version of a DEB
Hi Russel,
Actually, after checking the versions of axion, radeox, and nekohtml,
I've noticed that they're all dev or beta versions. Since I'd rather not
package these up as individual packages (since they're not officially
stable versions) I think we can include them in the groovy package.
Hi Russel,
Thanks for asking. There's no problems, only that to package Groovy I
had to package up all of its dependencies first as per the debian-java
recommendations, and I'm still half way through doing this.
The dependencies for Groovy (beta7) are:
ant-1.6.1.jar groov
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:41:05PM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> >and it seems rather difficult to create a package which needs several
> >recompilations to obtain the different targets we want to obtain
> >(dspam-libdb4, dspam-pgsql, dspam-mysql and dspam-sqlite).
> Hmm... it's not really that
Jesus Climent wrote:
Hi!
I have been discussing about the different target's option with Guillem Jover,
and it seems rather difficult to create a package which needs several
recompilations to obtain the different targets we want to obtain
(dspam-libdb4, dspam-pgsql, dspam-mysql and dspam-sqlite
Hi!
I have been discussing about the different target's option with Guillem Jover,
and it seems rather difficult to create a package which needs several
recompilations to obtain the different targets we want to obtain
(dspam-libdb4, dspam-pgsql, dspam-mysql and dspam-sqlite).
Is there any objecti
I'm happy to sponsor an initial upload for you, and look over your
package.
If you're bored of it, I can easily package it myself instead.
--
Andrew Stribblehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems programmer, IT Service, University of Durham, England
Your message dated Tue, 7 Dec 2004 02:04:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package exists in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # No package lingoteach in Debian
> retitle 279552 RFA: liblingoteach -- a language teaching program
Bug#279552: RFA: lingoteach -- a language teaching program
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # RFH bugs have severity normal, not wishlist
> severity 282283 normal
Bug#282283: RFH: dselect -- a user tool to manage Debian packages
Severity set to `normal'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # RFS is not a valid tag
> retitle 284187 ITP: wordpress-pg -- a semantic personal publishing platform -
> postgresql version
Bug#284187: ITP/RFS: wordpress-pg -- a semantic personal publishing platform -
postgresql version
Changed Bug title.
> thank
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:25:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#281112: fixed in guile-simplesql 2.3.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:27:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280675: fixed in l2tpns 2.0.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:26:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282351: fixed in sqlite3 3.0.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:21:56 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282449: fixed in gap-matrix-schreiersims 0.9.20041122-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:21:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280327: fixed in wwwstat 2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:16:47 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#261761: fixed in webcalendar 0.9.44-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:15:31 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#236409: fixed in rawdog 2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:16:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#222657: fixed in xmms-kde 3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:15:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259066: fixed in noiz2sa 0.51a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:16:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#271804: fixed in polygen 1.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:45:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282436: fixed in mffm-timecode 1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:38:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#241359: fixed in mathpartir 1.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:47:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275073: fixed in haskell-hsql 1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:51:40 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278914: fixed in dcmtk 3.5.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 138190 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#138190: ITP: mozilla-enigmail -- GPG extension for mozilla
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 216928 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#216928: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail: enigmail shouldn'
34 matches
Mail list logo
