Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the gtk-theme-switch package.
The package description is:
Utilities to easily switch GTK+ themes that can be run from the console, and
has an optional GUI dock and theme preview. It can install themes downloaded
from gtk.themes.org as wel
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:31:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing invalid bug in wnpp Debian package.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:11:39AM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any chance of getting your experimental packages?
devlabel I presume you mean?
I haven't worked on it for months because I was finding it horribly
non-devfs friendly, and upstream never responded to me.
Would you l
Hi,
Is there any chance of getting your experimental packages?
--
Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libspf2
Version : 1.0.4
Upstream Author : Wayne Schlitt http://libspf2.org/support.html
* URL : http://libspf2.org/index.html
* License : GPL
Description : C-library to inplement SPF framework (mail verifica
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pagodacf
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : James Woodyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.wetware.com/jhw/src/pagoda/
* License : BSD style
Description : OCaml library with miscellaneous utility functio
reassign 263352 ftp.debian.org
retitle 263352 Please remove wmapm
thanks
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-16 16:58]:
> in the past i decided to dopt wmapm (#263352), but now i decided it
> would be better to remove the package from the archive, because the
> upstream and the upstream home
Hi Michael,
in the past i decided to dopt wmapm (#263352), but now i decided it
would be better to remove the package from the archive, because the
upstream and the upstream homepage isnt't available anymore. the package
is bug free, but the package wmapm does pretty much the same thing as
wmapm.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 263352 ftp.debian.org
Bug#263352: ITA: wmapm -- an APM display program designed for WindowMaker
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 263352 Please remove wmapm
Bug#263352: ITA: wmapm -- an APM display program desig
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:35:51PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > Uploading. This will take a while since it will sit in queue/new untill
> > ftp-masters process it. Definitely not in time for sarge :(.
>
> Not even if we ask nicely? :(
We missed the last call for low urgency uploads
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: lua-mode
Version : 1.26
Upstream Author : Christian Vogler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://lua-users.org/files/wiki_insecure/editors/lua-mode.el
* License : GPL
Description : Lua mode for Emacs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ocamli18n
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://mattam.ath.cx/soft/OCamlI18N.html
* License : LGPL
Description : OCaml internationalization library
OCamlI18N provides an I18N mod
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235526: fixed in spong 2.7.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I now orphan the package ucbmpeg. It is a non-free tool that I have
not used for a very long time and also have not been able to
maintain on a regular basis. Someone else probably can maintain
this better than I do. I have also decided to orphan it instead
of just as
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 08:17:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:28:46PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Robert,
>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:28:46PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > Robert,
> > >
> > > Here is the ITP, and this is the package:
> > >
> > > http://
Hello,
since I am a frequent user of gnucash and gnucash-hbci, I probably
should stand up and contribute here. But I don't know anything about
scheme and neither am I a very experienced programmer, so hunting down
bugs might just be too much for me. But if others, who have these
skills, would join
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:32:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#246971: fixed in splay 0.9.5.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> Here is the ITP, and this is the package:
>
> http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grub-splashimages/
Hey.
You should be closing the ITP in your debian/changelog :)
--
Robert Millan
(Debra and Ian) (Gnu's Not (U
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > Here is the ITP, and this is the package:
> >
> > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grub-splashimages/
>
> Hey.
>
> You should be closing
Robert,
Here is the ITP, and this is the package:
http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grub-splashimages/
What else do you need?
Luis
- Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: "Luis R. Rodr
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2004-08-16
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: grub-splashimages
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grub-splashimages/
* License : GPL
Description
reassign 236073 ftp.debian.org
retitle 236073 Please remove 236073
reassign 236074 ftp.debian.org
retitle 236074 Please remove binutils-sparc
thanks
* Chris Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-14 13:53]:
> Sorry, I had forgotten to update the ITP. I have no problem with removing
> tkisem and bin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 236073 ftp.debian.org
Bug#236073: ITA: tkisem -- Graphical SPARC emulator
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 236073 Please remove 236073
Bug#236073: ITA: tkisem -- Graphical SPARC emulator
Changed Bug title.
> r
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 06:35:24PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Chris Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 22:25]:
> > My mistake, I couldn't remember if sparc-ld and sparc-as were actually
> > needed
> > to build tkisem, it turns out they are. So the build-dep on binutils-sparc
> > is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libgsnmp
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Juergen Schoenwaelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/pub/local/scli/testing/
* License : GNU GPL v2
Description : an SNMP library implementat
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:32:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#260113: fixed in sgrep 1.92a-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:23:31PM +0300, Niklas Vainio wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:58:33PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: openntpd
> > Upstream Author : Henning Brauer and Alexander Guy
> > * URL
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:12:40 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:58:33PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: openntpd
> Upstream Author : Henning Brauer and Alexander Guy
> * URL : http://www.openntpd.org/
> * License : BSD
> Description : OpenBS
Well actually the last snapshot RC5 builds with only a patch (needed for
autoconf stuff) and one for setting destdir. If you read the openca-devel
ml you hat notice this. The RC6, which was scheduled 2 week ago should
fix these problems; I'm waiting for it before some other tests.
BUT apart from t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openntpd
Upstream Author : Henning Brauer and Alexander Guy
* URL : http://www.openntpd.org/
* License : BSD
Description : OpenBSD NTP deamon
OpenNTPD is a FREE implementation of the Network Time Protocol. It
provide
Il lun, 2004-08-16 alle 08:47, Filip Van Raemdonck ha scritto:
> No, because it is a dupe for #181506. While they had been merged, the
> second did not provide any useful info beyond what was in the first
> report. IMHO wnpp bug list is long enough as it is, we should not keep
> merged bugs there u
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:46:54AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> Il sab, 2004-08-14 alle 18:48, Debian Bug Tracking System ha scritto:
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > #181646: RFP: numexp -- a GNOME program that implements numeric methods and
> > some mathema
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:34:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263495: fixed in libapache-singleton-perl 0.06-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:34:37 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263476: fixed in libnet-ifconfig-wrapper-perl 0.05-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:34:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263463: fixed in libhtml-template-expr-perl 0.04-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:35:58 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#261738: fixed in qsynaptics 0.22.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:32:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259969: fixed in kaquarium 1.0-beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:23:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259967: fixed in kfish 2.01-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:37:37 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#248455: fixed in torsmo 0.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:24:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#239244: fixed in php-radius 1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:26:40 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170583: fixed in ghdl 0.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:23:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#109041: fixed in simage 1.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:25:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#239704: fixed in mcpp 2.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:36:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#257345: fixed in vdr-plugin-femon 0.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:35:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#260879: fixed in gtweakui 0.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:25:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262953: fixed in python-pymetar 0.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:31:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262299: fixed in ksociograma 2.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:33:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263434: fixed in libsys-cpu-perl 0.40-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:15:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256537: fixed in bindgraph 0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:16:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250856: fixed in couriergraph 0.23-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:15:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#248948: fixed in ibwebadmin 0.98-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:19:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206139: fixed in freedoom 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:20:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262477: fixed in libchise 0.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:03:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#261918: fixed in liblo 0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:55:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256756: fixed in libgtk-trayicon-ruby 0.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:01:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#154684: fixed in shermans-aquarium 2.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:03:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148218: fixed in ifstat 1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:47:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#261093: fixed in libspf 0.99-1.0.0rc4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:43:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252727: fixed in gimp-gap 2.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:44:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203236: fixed in gcjwebplugin 0.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
> "Jeremy" == Jeremy T Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeremy> I was just trying to see where any packaging work was at
Jeremy> before I spent too much time working to get 0.9.2-RC5
Jeremy> packaged. I need this to be packaged for work and am able
Jeremy> to take care of it i
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:49:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252748: fixed in plopfolio 0.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:51:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#234907: fixed in kwartz 2004.05.09-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:48:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252746: fixed in mpdcon 1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 210638 + fixed
Bug#210638: ITP: mpd -- Music Player Daemon, the name says it all
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:37:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262033: fixed in asterisk-prompt-de 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:24:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244094: fixed in gradm2 2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:36:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229223: fixed in vdr-plugin-games 0.6.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
I was just trying to see where any packaging work was at before
I spent too much time working to get 0.9.2-RC5 packaged. I need this to
be packaged for work and am able to take care of it if it's not
currently being worked on. I've already looked at the binary DEBs
created by Alessandro but
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:24:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226890: fixed in digitemp 3.3.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnofract4d
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Edwin Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gnofract4d.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : easy creator of beautiful fractals
Gnofract 4D is an eleg
74 matches
Mail list logo
