> Bioinformatics 2004
> - Industry Impact and Outlook -
> 26th & 27th May 2004, Marriott Kensington, London
>
> Effective use of bioinformatic systems can drastically
> reduce drug discovery and development timescales
> * By using information technology and software tools
> to analyse gene se
Hello Wnpp ( Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:00:28 +0600 ) E-ma_il is Lo_ading.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 229214 ITA: libapache-mod-fastcgi -- FastCGI module for Apache
Bug#229214: O: libapache-mod-fastcgi -- FastCGI module for Apache
Changed Bug title.
> owner 229214 !
Bug#229214: ITA: libapache-mod-fastcgi -- FastCGI module for Apache
Owner recor
Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm curious as to what vcheck offers that uupdate (package: devscripts)
> doesn't. The reason I ask is that uupdate seems to be promoted for use
> by the debian packaging system: debhelper actually creates an example
> uupdate file, watch.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: hugin
Version : 0.4pre
Upstream Author : Pablo d'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Description : A GUI frontend to Panorama Tools that makes panorama
creation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 246147 RFP: netiathome -- collects network performance statistics
> from end-systems
Bug#246147: ITP: netiathome -- collects network performance statistics from
end-systems
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Greetings,
I'm curious as to what vcheck offers that uupdate (package: devscripts)
doesn't. The reason I ask is that uupdate seems to be promoted for use
by the debian packaging system: debhelper actually creates an example
uupdate file, watch.ex, in debian/.
Thanks,
Justin
signature.asc
Descr
Hello Wnpp ( Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:22:31 +0500 ) E-ma_il is Lo_ading.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I've not been using unison very much so I'd quite like someone else to
look after it and do what I've had planned for a while. Upstream have
released no new stable versions, but the beta version (2.9.20) has Gtk2
support, so should be made available in sid and hopefu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 245392 RFP: neon-doc FDL documentation for neon
Bug#245392: RFA: neon -- An HTTP and WebDAV client library
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: netiathome
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.neti.gatech.edu/index.html
* License : GPLv2
Description : collects network performance statistics from end-systems
[note: it
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2004-04-27
Severity: wishlist
Package name: silc toolkit (libsilc* and libsilc*-dev)
Version : 1.1.0
Author : Pekka Riikonen
URL : http://silcnet.org/
License : GPL
Description : libraries, header files f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: viewarch
Version : 0.0.8-63
Upstream Author : Tez Kamihira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://arch.bluegate.org/viewarch.html
* License : ViewCVS license
Description : archive browser for GNU arch (web-based
i have just added first test packages in my home repository:
http://piem.homeip.net/~piem/debian/
cheers, piem
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 02:56:29PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mer 14/04/2004 ? 14:29, Paul Brossier a ?crit :
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name
In our opinion SKS isn't quite ready yet to be in Debian main. There
are still various minor issues, like bad logging, no documentation, and
not knowing how to handle upgrade. They make us not want to support it
officially.
The source repository for the package is at
https://svn.clearairturbulenc
retitle 245392 RFP: neon-doc FDL documentation for neon
thanks
I decided to continue maintainance of neon with FDL documention
removed. neon-0.24.5.dfsg containing only DFSG free stuff is
already in incoming.
Since consensus seems to be the FDL documentation violates DFSG,
a separate documentatio
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Leo "Costela" Antunes wrote:
> Yes, indeed, but as I said, it's better IMO to keep make flags
> separated from configure.
IMHO, it is no point in having a CFLAGS variable in debian/rules which
does nothing useful. I took it completly out and got the same result.
Another poin
Recipient of the infected attachment: Mohd Isa bin Abdul Rahim\Inbox
Subject of the message: word document
One or more attachments were deleted
Attachment document.doc
.pif was Deleted for the following reasons:
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found.
Pos Malaysia Berhad is Malaysia's national
Hi Martin,
I believe that your mail means that you have made a debian package out
of my unit++ project.
What an excellent initiative IMH(and unbiased `-)O!
Can I do something that will ease the use of the package for people? Add
a link to the appropriate debian URL (What is that?) or perhaps off
19 matches
Mail list logo
