Your message dated Thu, 29 Jan 2004 02:40:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: loop-aes-ciphers-source_2.0d-3_i386.changes
ACCEPTED]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:46:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line change of direction
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gkrellmoon
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Dale P. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gkrellmoon.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : gkrellm plugin that shows the phase of the moon
BTW, CCing me on such messages would ensure I actually see them. It
was only a coincidence I read this ITP.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 02:13]:
> Hmmm, funny. Milan P. Stanic has set an ITA some weeks ago. Please see
BTW, see #225276 for the reason why it was removed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 180789 RFP: pizza-business -- a game in which you can run your own
> pizza business
Bug#180789: ITP: pizza-business -- a game in which you can run your own pizza
business
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Hi Adam!
On 2004-01-28 18:56 +0100, Adam Byrtek wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: metalog
> Version : 0.7
> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : http://metalog.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPL
> Desc
* Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-28 18:56]:
> - obsolete & useless
> Martin or the maintainer didn't give any arguments I could discuss. I
...
>
> I'm a bit confused that it was removed from the archive without any
> real reason (as far as I know).
The maintainer didn't give me any reas
My girlfriend has a USB prism2 card for her laptop.
She has been running 2.4.21 for some time, waiting for new wlan modules.
I only realized today they were not coming b/c it was orphaned.
It seems to me that 2.6 does not support her card.
Can you confirm this? If so, then I plan to adopt this pac
Hi,
any progress with this ITP?
Would you be in packaging more (pinentry-gtk, gpg-agent, ...)?
--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
retitle 180789 RFP: pizza-business -- a game in which you can run your own
pizza business
thanks
Upstream has dropped support for the software which still has some
(non critical) bugs, so I'm not going to put it into debian.
Interested developers can have a look at the project homepage and mail
T
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:17:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#217115: fixed in libnet-patricia-perl 1.010-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: metalog
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://metalog.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : a modern replacement for syslogd and klogd
The metalog pack
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the lsbdev-guide package.
The package description is:
This is the LSB Application Developers' Guide, a document that covers the
highlights and specifics that are important when developing applications
for Linux that are compliant with the Linux
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-volume-manager
Version : still in CVS
Upstream Author : Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/rview.cgi?cvsroot=/cvs/
gnome&dir=gnome-volume-manager
* License : GPL
Descriptio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: webmin-snort,webmin-exim,webmin-virtualserver(virtualmin)
Version : various
Upstream Author : various
* URL : http://www.webmin.com/
* License : GPL
Description : modules for webmin
These are various module
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:17:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ITP: cl-clx-sbcl -- An X11 Common Lisp client library for SBCL
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:31:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Accepted madison-lite 0.1 (all source)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:40:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line uploaded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 159800 - help
Bug#159800: O: pfe -- Portable Forth Environment, ANS standard, all wordsets
Tags were: help
Bug#154592: RFA: pfe -- Portable Forth Environment, ANS standard, all wordsets.
Tags removed: help
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-spf
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Terence Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.wayforward.net/spf/
* License : Python license
Description : pyspf - SPF (Sender Permitted From) module for Pytho
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libmail-srs-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Meng Weng Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://spf.pobox.com/
* License : GPL
Description : Perl package for Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS)
>From the SRS
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libnet-cidr-lite-perl
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : Douglas Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~dougw/Net-CIDR-Lite-0.15/
* License : Perl license
Description : Perl extension for m
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:40:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line uploaded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #229592
Package name: libmail-spf-query-perl
Version: 1.99-1
Upstream Author: Meng Weng Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Maintainer: Meinhard Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
License: GPL
Description: Perl package and tools for Sender Permitted From (SPF)
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 03:48:04AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> you surely should know better :P
I knew I'd forgotten to put a closes: in the changelog, but hadn't got
to the point in my mail-reading this morning where I knew about the
ACCEPT before you closed it. :)
--
Colin Watso
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:17:57AM +0100, guenter geiger wrote:
> > Hi Colin,
> >
> > I would like to take it if no one has taken it up to now.
>
> No-one has; go for it. Do you want / can you use my repository contents?
I not up do date with subversion
reassign 216212 ftp.debian.org
retitle 216212 Please remove smsclient
thanks
* Michael Holzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-28 11:08]:
> > It has been more than 3 months now that you've orphaned this and
> > nobody has shown any interest. Should it be removed now?
>
> I guess thats the best soluti
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:17:57AM +0100, guenter geiger wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> I would like to take it if no one has taken it up to now.
No-one has; go for it. Do you want / can you use my repository contents?
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Colin,
I would like to take it if no one has taken it up to now.
Guenter
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> It's become obvious that I don't really have time to maintain denemo as
> well as it deserves, having long since become involved in other t
> It has been more than 3 months now that you've orphaned this and
> nobody has shown any interest. Should it be removed now?
I guess thats the best solution available right now. The project
is dead, and so is the debian package.
-kju
--
It's an insane world, but i'm proud to be a part o
Le mer 28/01/2004 à 00:40, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> So what's the status of this? According to #210233, the new upstream
> version 3.0.3 doesn't have any copyright problems anymore.
That's not true. I'll paste here some informations gathered upstream and
with mails with Ingo Saitz. These mail
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:03:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#223370: fixed in makeztxt 1.60-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:05:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209124: fixed in nagios-nrpe 2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:00:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226902: fixed in libtemplate-plugin-class-perl 0.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:04:40 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#227495: fixed in mma 0.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:56:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#227785: fixed in libgsm 1.0.10-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:52:49 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226918: fixed in libcalendar-simple-perl 1.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:51:51 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226862: fixed in libcgi 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:38:47 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228843: fixed in jasmin-sable 1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:41:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229716: fixed in jpegpixi 0.14.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:35:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225932: fixed in iripdb 0.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:29:11 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#197208: fixed in flowscan 1.006-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:18:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228812: fixed in filelight 0.6.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:15:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156287: fixed in drip 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:15:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#227060: fixed in drpython 2.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:17:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#68262: fixed in eli 4.4.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:07:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203256: fixed in cryptokit 1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 223025 + fixed
Bug#223025: ITP: adduser-ng -- Next Generation of adduser script
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
49 matches
Mail list logo
