Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-25
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libebml
Version : CVS
Upstream Author : Steve Lhomme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.matroska.org/
* License : dual GPL/QPL
Description : Extensible Binary Me
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:48:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171314: fixed in uqm 0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:45:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195241: fixed in mozilla-stumbleupon 1.73-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:46:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198125: fixed in gtk-industrial-engine 0.2.26-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:55:36 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:33:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#197466: fixed in kanatest 0.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:37:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#158874: fixed in backuppc 2.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:18:49 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#197141: fixed in ygraph 0.14-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:10:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#197250: fixed in fprobe 0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:28:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#185224: fixed in kannel 1.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 178907 + fixed
Bug#178907: ITP: klogic -- KDE program for building and simulating \
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 192573 + fixed
Bug#192573: ITP: libmodule-info-perl -- Information about perl modules without
loading them
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
This bug should have been closed, the package has been uploaded.
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:17:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#188715: fixed in lua50 5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:17:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#188715: fixed in lua50 5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:25:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#194377: fixed in socketapi 1.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Susan,
This whole day job can really slow down the Debian Developer
application process. My apologies for the delays; if it gives
you any idea of how busy we've been, our little ol' Linux lab
has recently doubled in size -- and we plan on growing further.
Long nights and weekends have been de rig
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 05:14:56PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
scribbled:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > It's not quite a substitute, as it won't reuse autoconf's configs etc. How
> > about "A tool for configuring software source similar to GNU Aut
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Marek Habersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:52:20PM -0500, Steve Langasek scribbled:
> > Try "an alternative to GNU autoconf" or "a substitute for GNU autoconf",
> > to avoid confusion with Debian's alternatives syste
I've just noticed you've got an ITP for a gdm2-themes package sitting in
wnpp, but I'm a bit late. I had looked for gdm-themes in wnpp, but did
not find it, heh.
In the meantime, I have built a gdm-themes package and uploaded it to
the NEW queue (see bug #198326). I'm very sorry for stealing the I
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> It's not quite a substitute, as it won't reuse autoconf's configs etc. How
> about "A tool for configuring software source similar to GNU Autoconf"?
Sorry for my previous reply to this message, your suggestion is definitely
good.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> It's not quite a substitute, as it won't reuse autoconf's configs etc. How
> about "A tool for configuring software source similar to GNU Autoconf"?
I see your point, but your suggestion is still too long: it should be
rephrased to
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-25
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kernel-patch-2.4-low-latency
Upstream Author : Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/schedlat.html
* License : GPL
Description : Reduces
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:52:20PM -0500, Steve Langasek scribbled:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> >
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:52:20PM -0500, Steve Langasek scribbled:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Description : The pmk project aims to be an alternative
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:46:52PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> scribbled:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Description : The pmk project aims to be an alternativ
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> [...]
> > Description : The pmk project aims to be an alternative to
> > GNU/autoconf (configure scripts).
>
> Description field is inappropri
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
[...]
> Description : The pmk project aims to be an alternative to GNU/autoconf
> (configure scripts).
Description field is inappropriate, use something like:
Description: A GNU/autoconf alternative.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whis
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
scribbled:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> [...]
> > Description : The pmk project aims to be an alternative to
> > GNU/autoconf (configure scripts).
>
> Description field is inapp
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pmk
Version : 0.4.5
Upstream Author : Damien Couderc & Xavier Santolaria
* URL : http://premk.sf.net/
* License : BSD
Description : The pmk project aims to be an alt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 24.06.03 um 11:51 Uhr schrieb Daniel Stone:
It`s possible to package non-existing software ?
I can`t view your source, perhaps you`re too early with your ITP.
* Package name: debbackup
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : D
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 10:59 am, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 11:44:51AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Tell me when you upload this, so I can file an rc bug against it, for
> > modifying other packages conffiles.
>
> *g*
>
> 5 serious replies already -- sorry Adam, I'm
Your message dated 24 Jun 2003 18:35:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing ; adopted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated 24 Jun 2003 18:35:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing ; adopted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 11:44:51AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-24
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: debbackup
> > Version : 0.1
> > Upstream Author : Daniel Sto
Your message dated 24 Jun 2003 19:25:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bu
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: debbackup
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/~dsto
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:34:33AM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Jun 24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > Not sure I follow. I did the following:
> > [snipped because post-mode decided to kill your entire train of
> > thought here... grr]
>
> I think there's a nasty issue that will crop up if you
On Jun 24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Not sure I follow. I did the following:
> [snipped because post-mode decided to kill your entire train of
> thought here... grr]
I think there's a nasty issue that will crop up if you try to work
from the files in the Debian archive. debuild -us -uc, then wip
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:52:12AM -0500, Douglas Bates wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:31:53PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> > > Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[... cut to preserve some space as we're getting more generic h
On Jun 24, Douglas Bates wrote:
> At present we have two alternatives:
>
> 1) Name the Debian source package according to the R package name, as
> Dirk suggests. I don't think this is a viable long-term strategy.
> The names, like "XML", are too vague.
Not only that, but Debian has stricter sour
#include
* Daniel Stone [Tue, Jun 24 2003, 07:51:13PM]:
> * Package name: debbackup
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/~dstone/debbackup/
> (not functional yet)
> * Licens
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:31:53PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> > Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> > > * Package name: r-noncran-design
> > > Version : 1.1.6
> >
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:39:41AM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Jun 24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:31:53PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> > > Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Package: wnpp
> > > > Severity: wishlist
> > > >
> > > > * P
Please, close if you adopted the package.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Jun 24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:31:53PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> > Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> > > * Package name: r-noncran-design
> > > Version : 1.1.6
> > > Upstre
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 03:38:31PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 16:31:07 -0500 Matt Zimmerman wrote
> > If you can get your code into a public CVS repository somewhere, I'll see
> > what I can do about 1 and 2.
>
> Hello,
> How about pkg-tvtime on alioth?
There is n
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:31:53PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: r-noncran-design
> > Version : 1.1.6
> > Upstream Author : Frank Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * UR
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: r-noncran-design
> Version : 1.1.6
> Upstream Author : Frank Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://hesweb1.med.virginia.edu/biostat/rms
> * License : GP
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:29:05PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Hey, how far along is this? I've been thinking that this would be very
> possible and very useful. Including having the result be an ISO image and
> combine with one of those autoinstall tools to automatically recreate a
> ma
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:51:13PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> * Package name: debbackup
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/~dstone/debbackup/
> (not functional yet)
> * Li
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debbackup
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/~dstone/debbackup/
(not functional yet)
*
Hi Moshe,
I am in the process of searching for a decent Python-based IRC bot, and
bumped into your ITP dated 7 Sept 2002. I checked the link you provided
out, and saw that you have a package for Pynfo 0.4.6.
I'm curious: did you get the Pynfo package to work out decently, at
least for version 0.4
53 matches
Mail list logo
