Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le ven 20/06/2003 à 05:42, Marc Wilson a écrit : > Please do, for those of us still using GTK1 applications that want a > consistent look. > > Not all GTK applications are Gnome ones. :) I did, see http://people.debian.org/~joss/packages/ Thanks for your interest, -- .''`. Josselin M

Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Marc Wilson
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:15:48AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > I'm not sure I will package the GTK1 stuff, as we have very little Gnome > software still using it in sid. Please do, for those of us still using GTK1 applications that want a consistent look. Not all GTK applications are Gnome o

Bug#198260: ITP: streamtuner -- A GUI audio stream directory browser

2003-06-20 Thread Ari Pollak
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-20 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: streamtuner Version : 0.9.1 Upstream Author : Jean-Yves Lefort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/streamtuner * Licen

Bug#195370: marked as done (ITA: pilot-link)

2003-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:32:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#195370: fixed in pilot-link 0.11.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#164483: replace this with simpleTAL?

2003-06-20 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have never used python-tal, but simpleTAL[1] instead. It is written from the ground up and has almost all features of the Zope TAL. [1] http://www.owlfish.com/software/simpleTAL/ So I suggest a) package python-simpletal b) drop python-tal, peop

Bug#197523: ITA: worker -- Highly configurable two-paned file manager for X

2003-06-20 Thread Rick Younie
Tobias Toedter wrote: > Hi Rick, > > I would be interested in adopting the worker package from you. I already got > the latest upstream release and had a short look at it. > > If you don't object, I will retitle your bug to ITA and do the packaging. > > I'm not an official DD yet, but I already

Bug#197523: ITA: worker -- Highly configurable two-paned file manager for X

2003-06-20 Thread Tobias Toedter
Hi Rick, I would be interested in adopting the worker package from you. I already got the latest upstream release and had a short look at it. If you don't object, I will retitle your bug to ITA and do the packaging. I'm not an official DD yet, but I already have a sponsor for my other debian p

Bug#191203: marked as done (ITA: sbuild -- Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources)

2003-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:02:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191203: fixed in sbuild 0.26 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: Fixed in NMU of sbuild 0.25

2003-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 191203 + fixed Bug#191203: ITA: sbuild -- Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#198190: ITP: upx-ucl-beta -- an efficient live-compressor for executables (beta version)

2003-06-20 Thread Robert Luberda
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-20 Severity: wishlist Hi, I intend to package an unstable (beta) version of upx. This version supports compresing of the Linux kernel and thus can be used by our boot floppies team. * Package name: upx-ucl-beta Version : 1.91

Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le ven 20/06/2003 à 10:50, Mateusz Papiernik a écrit : > > I'm not sure I will package the GTK1 stuff, as we have very little Gnome > > software still using it in sid. > > But there are some useful programs, which I think - should look the same as > GTK2 programs. If you can, I think packaging gtk

Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Mateusz Papiernik
> I'm not sure I will package the GTK1 stuff, as we have very little Gnome > software still using it in sid. But there are some useful programs, which I think - should look the same as GTK2 programs. If you can, I think packaging gtk1 version is a good idea. Mati

Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le ven 20/06/2003 à 00:15, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > * Package name: gtk-industrial-engine > Version : 0.2.26 > Upstream Author : Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Christopher Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Bug#198151: O: kforth -- Small Forth Interpreter Written in C++

2003-06-20 Thread Bdale Garbee
Package: wnpp I'm not using this version of Forth, and I'm not particularly fond of C++. Since I have no intention of fixing the FTBFS bug currently open against the package, I hereby orphan it... anyone who wants to hack on it, feel free to adopt it, otherwise I will try to remember to request t