-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello mentors,
I have a new package that's in need of a sponsor: festalon. As the
subject implies it is an NSF (NES Sound Format) music player. There are
two binary packages: a command-line player, and an XMMS plugin. The
package (along with binary
> original upstream is gone and atm i don't have the time to bring
> the package back into shape.
> please have a look at http://arch.fifthvision.net/ for new upstream.
Last time I looked, Tom Lord released 1.0pre17, but that tells
nothing :)
As someone relying heavily on arch, and using it on a
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-05
Severity: normal
hi :)
original upstream is gone and atm i don't have the time to bring
the package back into shape.
please have a look at http://arch.fifthvision.net/ for new upstream.
I request an adopter for the arch package.
The packag
Subject: RFP: kernel-patch-non-free-drivers: non-DFSG Linux Kernel "bits"
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : kernel-patch-non-free-drivers
* License : Several
SMC Token Ring says it's "strictly for use in conjunction with the use of
SMC TokenRing ad
Subject: RFP: hyadan a Steganographic tool to hide messages in i386 executables
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : hydan
Version: 0.10
Upsream Author : Rakan El-Khalil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.crazyboy.com/hydan/
* License : None given
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Orphaning epic4-script-thirdeye.
--
Brian Almeida | http://tynian.net| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer | http://www.debian.org| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-05
Severity: normal
Hi, I don't use this package any more. Security of this package is
quite important, and I fell I can't support it properly as I don't use
it.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I request an adopter for the sanitizer package.
The pa
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 03:54:10PM +0100, Timothee Besset wrote:
> What is the status on lufs packaging?
Messages to the bug alone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) don't go to the bug
submitter, i.e. the person who's packaging this, unless you explicitly
Cc them.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
What is the status on lufs packaging?
I have never packaged .debs before. lufs sounds a bit hard to package
because it has suid stuff and kernel modules .. but I'd be interested to
give it a try. Eduard, have you done anything around the package?
TTimo
Your message dated Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:26:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line please close rfp bug (#148813)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 157912 + fixed
Bug#157912: ITA: mopd -- The Maintenance Operations Protocol (MOP) loader
daemon.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:51:10PM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote:
> I would like to take over the ITP for the lkcd package.
>
> I am not a DD, but I have a sponsor and intend to upload shortly.
Ah OK. Please check with Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
who also notified me of his interest in this
12 matches
Mail list logo
