Bug#150192: Still packaging GNOME Clipboard Manager?

2002-12-01 Thread Andrew Lau
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 06:00:50PM +, Ross Burton wrote: > Here's a deal -- if I don't get these changes in CVS by next > weekend, I'll mail you what I have and you can take over the ITP. Thanks. Best of luck fixing it Ross. Please don't perceive my ITA to ITP as aggressiveness on my part. Or

Bug#171385: ITP: racoon: IPsec ISAKMP implementation

2002-12-01 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist I just downloaded the latest upstream source for the iputils packages and noticed that they it now contains quite a bit of IPsec code. This includes libipsec and racoon. Racoon is the KAME ISAKMP (IPsec key exchange protocol) implementation. I haven't investigat

Bug#164443: marked as done (O: ganso -- GNOME Animation Studio)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:06:46 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170435: removal of ganso] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#133228: marked as done (O: gide -- Gnome Integrated Development Environment)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:05:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170429: please remove gide] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#134961: marked as done (O: kernel-patch-kiobuf -- Stephen Tweedie's kiobuf (formerly raw-io) patch)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:07:03 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170430: please remove kernel-patch-kiobuf] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#154099: marked as done (ITA: gnat-doc -- Documentation for the GNU Ada 95 compiler)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:08:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#168511: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: Please remove gnat-doc)] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#156798: marked as done (O: ipmi-ctl -- IPMI (Intelligent Platform Management Interface) support tools)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:05:07 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170919: Please remove ipmi-ctl] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#156801: marked as done (O: ipmi-ctl -- IPMI (Intelligent Platform Management Interface) support tools)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:05:07 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170919: Please remove ipmi-ctl] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#160363: marked as done (O: gnut -- A command-line based client compatible with Gnutella-net)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:07:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170436: please remove gnut] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#162305: marked as done (O: eeyes -- The Electric Eyes graphics viewer/editor)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:05:26 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170434: please remove eeyes] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#68639: marked as done (O: fastforward -- aliases-style mail forwarding for qmail)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:06:32 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170479: please remove fastforward from unstable/testing] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#166331: marked as done (ITA: geas -- GNU Enterprise Application Server)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:06:14 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170354: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: Please remove geas from the Debian archive)] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#162476: marked as done (O: xfonts-gimpers -- X11 fonts created by Artwiz, TigerT, and Daniel Erat)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:07:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#170438: remove xfonts-gimpers] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: wnpp cleanup

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 169208 Bug#169208: ITP: nsd -- authoritative only, high performance, simple and open source name server. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > retitle 170814 ITP: ImageJ -- Java image processing and anlys

Bug#155923: DOSBOX for Debian

2002-12-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > I hope lintian / debhelper of sid are also fixed this way that ^ > > > > W: dosbox: postinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link > > W: dosbox: postinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link > > > > > va

Processed: Submitter changes

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 130327 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#130327: Does not fail on build-test failures Changed Bug submitter. > submitter 130332 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#130332: ed refuses '-' option Changed Bug submitter. > submitter 130616 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#130616: R

Bug#171357: RFP: cdargs -- the shell cd with bookmarks and browser

2002-12-01 Thread Robert Millan
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-01 Severity: wishlist * Package name: cdargs Version : 1.20 Upstream Author : Stefan Kamphausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others * URL : http://www.skamphausen.de/software/cdargs/download.html * License : GPL

Bug#169557: RFA: xcolorsel -- display colors and names in X

2002-12-01 Thread Ian Zimmerman
itz> Orphaning it. Matej> Ah, are you just looking for another maintainer (RFA), or Matej> really orphaning it (O)? I mean, are you willing to maintain Matej> it for the time being, or should the QA group take over? Leave me as the maintainer for now. -- Ian Zimmerman, Oakland, California, U.

Processed: libxmltv-perl packaged by Kenneth J. Pronovici

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 166931 Bug#166931: ITP: xmltv -- XMLTV is a set of utilities to manage your TV viewing Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andrew Lenharth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#171351: RFA: xmlto -- XML-to-any converter

2002-12-01 Thread christophe barbe
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-01 Severity: normal I request an adopter for the xmlto package. I posted recently about orphaning it on -devel and got a few answers but nobody adopted it yet. I consider this package important for debian but feel that I lack sgml and TeX knowl

Bug#169557: RFA: xcolorsel -- display colors and names in X

2002-12-01 Thread Matej Vela
Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Orphaning it. Ah, are you just looking for another maintainer (RFA), or really orphaning it (O)? I mean, are you willing to maintain it for the time being, or should the QA group take over? Thanks, Matej

Processed: WNPP cleanup

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 114821 Bug#114821: ITA: aolserver -- The web engine that powers America On-Line Bug closed, send any further explanations to "Brent A. Fulgham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > close 163421 Bug#163421: ITP: meld -- GNOME2 diff and merge tool Bug closed, se

Bug#160472: marked as done (ITA: plucker -- Pluck stuff from the web and read on your PalmOS device)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 12:17:40 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#160472: fixed in plucker 1.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#150192: Still packaging GNOME Clipboard Manager?

2002-12-01 Thread Andrew Lau
Dear Ross, It's been nearly 3 months since you filed an ITP on the RFP for the GNOME Clipboard Manager [2]. Do you still intend to package/maintain it? Otherwise I'd like to express my intention to adopt it if you're too busy. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau [1] http://bugs.debian.

Bug#68637: vchkpw -> vpopmail

2002-12-01 Thread Matt Hope
The source that is in the vchkpw is from 1998, and is version 3.0. The upstream name of this package has changed to "vpopmail", and is now at version 5.2.1 Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is attributed as being the original author in vpopmail-5.2.1/AUTHORS. The current website for vpopmail (n

Bug#170988: marked as done (ITP: libdbh1.0-1 -- Creates disk based hashtables)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:14:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#170988: fixed in dbh 1.0.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#170987: marked as done (ITP: gtk-xfce-engine -- A GTK+-2.0 theme engine for Xfce)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:16:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#170987: fixed in gtk2-engines-xfce 2.0.10+cvs.20021127-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#170985: marked as done (ITP: xffm4 -- File manager for the Xfce4 desktop environment)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:27:51 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#170985: fixed in xffm4 4.0.0+cvs.20021127-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#166641: marked as done (ITP: xfwm4 -- window manager of the XFce project)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:30:57 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#166641: fixed in xfwm4 4.0.0+cvs.20021127-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#166633: marked as done (ITP: xfce4 -- The Cholesterol Free Desktop Environment (panel))

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:22:42 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#166633: fixed in xfce4 4.0.0+cvs.20021127-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#166636: marked as done (ITP: xfce4-utils -- Various tools for XFce)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:24:51 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#166636: fixed in xfce4-utils 4.0.0+cvs.20021127-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#122929: wpoison

2002-12-01 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 02:55:26PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: > Hello Robert, > > I saw an RFP for wpoison from you from some time ago, and I took a quick > look at the program. It looks like a good idea, but the I am unsure > about the license. On the wpoison site, one page says "must include a

Bug#166631: marked as done (ITP: libxfcegui4 -- Various gtk widgets for xfce)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:20:38 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#166631: fixed in libxfcegui4 0.0.8+cvs.20021127-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#166639: marked as done (ITP: xfdeskmenu -- XFce tools xfdeskmenu and xftheme)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:26:41 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#166639: fixed in xfdeskmenu4 4.0.0+cvs.20021127-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: #171116 is a duplicate of #170400

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 171116 Bug#171116: ITP: tsclient -- GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#170565: marked as done (ITP: uif -- Advanced iptables-firewall script)

2002-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:04:29 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#170565: fixed in uif 1.0.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r