Bug#170069: ITP: grunt -- Secure remote execution via UUCP or e-mail using GPG

On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:47:48AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:24:34AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > After verifying the signature on the data, the receiver does some sanity > > > checks. One of the checks is doing an md5sum over the entire file >

Bug#170336: [RFP]: linux-wlan-ng -- Can't (re)build it for my own kernel

reassign 170336 linux-wlan-ng retitle 170336 linux-wlan-ng: Can't (re)build it for my own kernel thanks On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 12:32:46AM +0100, Xavier MAILLARD wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: linux-wlan-ng > Version : > Upstream Author : Name <[E

Processed: Re: Bug#170336: [RFP]: linux-wlan-ng -- Can't (re)build it for my own kernel

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 170336 linux-wlan-ng Bug#170336: [RFP]: linux-wlan-ng -- Can't (re)build it for my own kernel Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `linux-wlan-ng'. > retitle 170336 linux-wlan-ng: Can't (re)build it for my own kernel Bug#170336: [RFP]: linux-

Processed: retitle 140985 to RFP: rbot -- IRC bot written in ruby

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 140985 RFP: rbot -- IRC bot written in ruby Bug#140985: ITP: rbot -- IRC bot written in ruby Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#170336: [RFP]: linux-wlan-ng -- Can't (re)build it for my own kernel

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: linux-wlan-ng Version : Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.some.org/ * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Description : Can't (re)build it for my own kernel , | Hi, atte

Bug#170069: ITP: grunt -- Secure remote execution via UUCP or e-mail using GPG

On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:24:34AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > After verifying the signature on the data, the receiver does some sanity > > checks. One of the checks is doing an md5sum over the entire file > > (remember, this i

Bug#170300: O: libcomprex -- GNUpdate Multi-purpose compression library

Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-22 Severity: normal I orphaned the libcomprex package, it is in bad shape and completely unbuildable (see bug #162438). I'm not able to change the maintainer field and to upload a new version. debian directory is actually maintained in upstream

Bug#162411: ITA: gtk-engines-cleanice2 -- CleanIce theme for GTK+ 2.x

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-22 Followup-For: Bug #162411 hello.. i will take this package for adoption, plus gtk-engines-mgicchikn. cheers, sebastian -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux enigma 2.4.19 #2 Mon Okt 14 16:48:15 C

Bug#162412: ITA: gtk-engines-mgicchikn -- Magic Chicken theme for GTK+ 2.x

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-22 Followup-For: Bug #162412 hi there.. i will take this one for adoption, together with gtk-engines-cleanice2 cheers, sebastian -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux enigma 2.4.19 #2 Mon Okt 14 16:4

Bug#170291: O: leakbug -- GNUpdate leakbug tracer library

Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-22 Severity: normal I orphaned the leakbug package, it should be in pretty good shape. debian directory is actually maintained in upstream CVS repository, so who intends to adopt leakbug can ask him if a new CVS access is available. The packag

Bug#170293: O: libgnurdf -- A library for parsing and processing RDF files

Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-22 Severity: normal I orphaned the libgnurdf package, it should be in pretty good shape. debian directory is actually maintained in upstream CVS repository, so who intends to adopt libgnurdf can ask him if a new CVS access is available. The pa

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 154098 ITA: gnat -- The GNU Ada 95 compiler Bug#154098: ITA Changed Bug title. > retitle 154099 ITA: gnat-doc -- Documentation for the GNU Ada 95 compiler Bug#154099: ITA Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please c

Bug#170069: ITP: grunt -- Secure remote execution via UUCP or e-mail using GPG

On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:35:11PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > 30 days seems like an awfully long time... > > I would have though rejecting any requests, say an hour old would > be better... > > So, if you did issue an halt command, the worst an attacker could do > would be to delay execution by on

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 154098 ITA Bug#154098: O: gnat -- The GNU Ada 95 compiler Changed Bug title. > retitle 154099 ITA Bug#154099: O: gnat-doc -- Documentation for the GNU Ada compiler Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > mailx [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<... Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > retitle 155923 ITP: dosbox -- Yet another DOS emulator Bug#155923: RFP: dosbox -- Yet another DOS emulator Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#170274: RFP: mozilla-locale-pl -- Polish Menu/Message resource and Region property package for Mozilla

Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-22 Severity: wishlist * Package name: mozilla-locale-pl Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.some.org/ * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Description : Pol

Bug#170069: ITP: grunt -- Secure remote execution via UUCP or e-mail using GPG

John Goerzen wrote: > After verifying the signature on the data, the receiver does some sanity > checks. One of the checks is doing an md5sum over the entire file > (remember, this includes both the headers and the payload). If it > has seen the same md5sum in the last 60 days, it rejects the req