Bug#157133: ITP: libtime-piece-perl -- Perl module for object oriented time objects

2002-08-17 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-17 Severity: wishlist * Package name: libtime-piece-perl Version : 1.07 Upstream Author : Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.cpan.org/ * License

Bug#135568: ITP: libclass-date-perl -- easy date and time manipulation

2002-08-17 Thread Jay Bonci
I have this packaged and online at http://jay.bonci.com/debian It is waiting on NMU from my sponsor (or I'll handle this after that process is done). Control: Source: libclass-date-perl Section: interpreters Priority: optional Maintainer: Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhel

Processed: ITP: libclass-date-perl -- easy date and time manipulation

2002-08-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle #135568 ITP: libclass-date-perl -- easy date and time manipulation Bug#135568: RFP: libclass-date-perl -- easy date and time manipulation Changed Bug title. > --jay Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > End of message, s

Bug#157104: wnpp: ITP: totem - A simple movie player for the Gnome desktop based on xine.

2002-08-17 Thread seb128
Package: wnpp Version: N/A Severity: wishlist * Package name : totem Version : 0.8 Upstream Author : Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL: http://www.hadess.net/totem.php3 * License : GPL v2 Description : A simple movie player for the Gnome desktop based on xine. Its features :

Processed: your mail

2002-08-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 34837 Bug#34837: RFP: pccts-doc -- PCCTS book and "Notes For New Users" Bug#51118: RFP: pccts-doc -- PCCTS book and "Notes For New Users" Bug#51261: RFP: pccts-doc -- PCCTS book and "Notes For New Users" Bug#98762: RFP: pccts-doc -- PCCTS book and

Bug#154312: mldonkey itp

2002-08-17 Thread Søren Boll Overgaard
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 03:13:23PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi! > > Could anyone please update me on the status of the packaging of > mldonkey? There's a lot of talk in the bug report, but it's not clear > _who_ is actually going to package it. Could anyone who is really > interested in packa