close 111842
thanks
Status of gwireless-applet
- the upstream site hasn't been updated in a year
- it still has upstream bugs that make it not useful in some panel sizes
- it depends on a Red Hat program for getting root
- wavelan-applet provides similar functionality
I withdraw my ITP.
Than
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 111842
Bug#111842: ITP: gwireless-applet -- GNOME applet and management tool for
wireless network cards
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pnet
Version : 0.3.8
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.southern-storm.com.au/portable_net.html#download
* License : GPL
Description : DotGNU Portable.NE
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tau
Version : 2.11.12
Upstream Author : Sameer Suresh Shende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.acl.lanl.gov/tau/
* License : MIT/X-style
Description : Tuning and Analys
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:19:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#149455: fixed in aiksaurusgtk 0.14-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:09:39 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#149238: fixed in vimacs 0.93-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:19:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144655: fixed in aiksaurus 0.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:42:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#149217: fixed in qemacs 0.2+really0.3pre12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:42:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148406: fixed in wmifinfo 0.05-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:44:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#130019: fixed in sjeng 11.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:39:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#115726: fixed in generator 0.34-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:27:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148638: fixed in unlambda 2.0.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:37:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#87404: fixed in jpilot-mail 0.0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:37:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#143947: fixed in jpilot-mail 0.0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:24:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148527: fixed in python-tclink 3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 23:58:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line http://bugs.debian.org/141191
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Le mardi 11 juin 2002 à 18:17:46, Simon Kelley a écrit:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-11
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: brag
> Version : 1.2.1
> Upstream Author : Akos Polster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : http://brag.sourceforge.net/
> * Lic
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:12:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close ITP: GAEL
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: brag
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Akos Polster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://brag.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : a script to download and assemble m
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:46:59PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Is it? The author seems to have a self-contradictory license:
>
> "Copy it. Use it. Don't sell it."
>
> "This software is distributed under the Gnu Public License. See
>the file "license" for details."
>
> I guess yo
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: batik
Version : 1.5beta2
Upstream Author : Apache XML Project
* URL : http://xml.apache.org/batik/
* License : Apache Software License
Description : Apache's Batik SVG Toolk
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 23:57:56 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Wow, it's installed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-11
Severity: wishlist
Package name: xprint-xprintorg
Version : v.006
Upstream Author : Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://xprint.mozdev.org/
License : MIT/X
Description : Xprint server: printing
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 126514 wishlist
Bug#126514: RFP: failsafe -- High-Availability (HA) solution
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, christophe barbe wrote:
>
> For DVI, PDF and PostScript output, Sebastian Rahtz's
> PassiveTeX is required.
>
Does this mean you are going to package PassiveTeX too? (There's an RFP
for it: #133005) If so I have an attempt at a package at
http://www.braincells.com/debian/pa
I might have missed something, but when I run lintian over the nvrec
package, it complains about the copyright file, even though I modified
it as indicated in the file itself (GPL file).
Any ideas?
--
greetz, marc
BOFH excuse #371:
Incorrectly configured static routes on the coreroute
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: regionset
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Christian Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://linuxtv.org/dvd/
* License : GPL
Description : several tools for manipulating dv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 148469 ITP: nvrec -- a high performant v4l1/v4l2 capture core
Bug#148469: nvrec: a high performant v4l1/v4l2 capture core
Changed Bug title.
> --=20
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
40 matches
Mail list logo
