Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 148690 wnpp
Bug#148690: New Package Lingoteach
Bug reassigned from package `itp' to `wnpp'.
> retitle 148690 ITP: lingoteach
Bug#148690: New Package Lingoteach
Changed Bug title.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:59:56AM +0100, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
> * Package name: unlambda
> Version : 2.0.0
> Upstream Author : David A. Madore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL :
> http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/madore/programs/unlambda/
> * License : GPL
>
>
> Q2: python-jabber uses socket.ssl (libssl), should I
> put it in a section != main? python is in main.
>
ssl is fine in main now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:59:18AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > making python-jabber2.{1,2} would let it, but is it the correct way?
> if you want to support multiple python versions, yes. You could also make a
> python-jabber package which depended on the newest python version you
> sup
>
> making python-jabber2.{1,2} would let it, but is it the correct way?
>
if you want to support multiple python versions, yes. You could also make a
python-jabber package which depended on the newest python version you support.
That way a user can just use python-jabber and let the upgrades
I uploaded to
http://www.students.cs.unibo.it/~alfarano/debian/jabber/
a pre ftp-master-upload version of python-jabber.
Anyone interested in this package (or in python packages quality ;)
could test it?
It is a python 2.1 and 2.2 module set, no .so file.
I make a python-jabber only package. I d
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 12:13:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: gnophone_0.2.4-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:49:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#104283: fixed in libcomprex 0.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated 31 May 2002 10:53:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:15:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148598: fixed in libbusiness-onlinepayment-tclink-perl
1.01-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:14:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148525: fixed in libnet-tclink-perl 3.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:12:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#141450: fixed in jack-audio-connection-kit 0.34.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:10:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145703: fixed in gnome-xine 0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
I just wanted to comment that Daniel Stone I believe is going to package
this until KDE 3.1 (Daniel is upstream Kopete) and then it will supposedly
go into kdenetwork which I maintain...
Chris
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:01:44AM +0200, Till Gerken wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 20
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 148526 + fixed
Bug#148526: ITP: php4-tclink -- TrustCommerce Credit Card Processing API
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:06:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148503: fixed in xmms-nas 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:01:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148461: fixed in zope-edit 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:00:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148460: fixed in zope-docfindereverywhere 0.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 10:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148374: fixed in darkstat 1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 10:44:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148325: fixed in gaff 0.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:00:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#147642: fixed in monit 2.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 141070 + fixed
Bug#141070: ITP: aptconf -- debconf infrastructure for setting up apt sources
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
On Tue, 28 May 2002 20:58:03 +0200 (MEST),
Lukas Geyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed one other detail, the default configuration file now gets
> installed in /usr/share/doc/sjeng/examples/, the manpage is updated
> accordingly.
>
> Updated version is available under the same address
>
>
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 10:35:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#68712: fixed in twiki 20011201-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 10:18:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148165: fixed in rigel 0.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 10:35:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#68712: fixed in twiki 20011201-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 10:18:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148163: fixed in libnet-google-perl 0.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 10:19:58 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148069: fixed in pimppa 0.5.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 10:21:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#131946: fixed in dbengine 1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 10:31:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#129974: fixed in mtop 0.6.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 09:47:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148076: fixed in schedutils 0.0.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 09:40:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144109: fixed in docbook-defguide 2.0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 09:43:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145628: fixed in hdico 0.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 136671 + fixed
Bug#136671: RFP: flite -- a small, fast runtime synthesis engine
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Hi
Do You really plan to package NeTraMet for debian?
I see Your ITP but I can't find any other info :(
With Best Wishes
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 148469 nvrec: a high performant v4l1/v4l2 capture core
quit
deb http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/
ffmpegrec is has been included (next to nuvrec and divx4rec).
The binaries have been moved to all smallcaps and manpages for nuvrec
and divx4rec are added (ffmpeg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 148469 nvrec: a high performant v4l1/v4l2 capture core
Bug#148469: ITP: nvrec -- NVrec aims to be a high quality, generic capture core
Changed Bug title.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-31
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: unlambda
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : David A. Madore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/madore/programs/unlambda/
* License : GPL
Description
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 148538 RFP: opengatekeeper -- gatekeeper for OpenH323
Bug#148538: Opengatekeeper
Changed Bug title.
> severity 148538 wishlist
Bug#148538: RFP: opengatekeeper -- gatekeeper for OpenH323
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2002 22:09:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no longer ITP'ing this
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
40 matches
Mail list logo
