Bug#113238: mplayer now fully GPL?

2002-05-18 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 07:14:21PM -0500, Bob McElrath wrote: > It appears that the mplayer folks have removed the non-free OpenDivX > code, and is now fully GPL'd. That's what, the fourth time? > I suggest we reconsider adding it to debian. I suggest somebody go over it with a fine-tooth comb,

Bug#113238: mplayer now fully GPL?

2002-05-18 Thread Bob McElrath
It appears that the mplayer folks have removed the non-free OpenDivX code, and is now fully GPL'd. I suggest we reconsider adding it to debian. Cheers, -- Bob Bob McElrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics pgphHoleb2lQ9.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#147380: ITP: gnunet -- anonymous, distributed, reputation-based network.

2002-05-18 Thread Robert Millan
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-18 Severity: wishlist * Package name: gnunet Version : 0.3.3 * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/GNUnet/ * License : GPL Description : anonymous, distributed, reputation-based network. GNUnet is an anonymous, dis

Processed: RFP: euler

2002-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 139844 ITP: euler - computing with real and complex numbers and Bug#139844: RFP: euler -- computing with real and complex numbers and matrices Changed Bug title. > matrices Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > -- Stopping proce

Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION

2002-05-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 05:19:23PM +0200, Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > > He also mentioned the possibility to change the license to explicitly > > > forbid the distribution of binaries. > > > > How can they do that? Isn't WINE GPL? > > Ok, I'm moving onto thin ice her

Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION

2002-05-18 Thread Marc Leeman
> > He also mentioned the possibility to change the license to explicitly > > forbid the distribution of binaries. > > How can they do that? Isn't WINE GPL? Ok, I'm moving onto thin ice here, since I do not know the knitty gritty of licensing. Wine used to be a X11 license (I think), which is

Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION

2002-05-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 01:18:56PM +0200, Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > He also mentioned the possibility to change the license to explicitly > forbid the distribution of binaries. How can they do that? Isn't WINE GPL? Daniel -- / Daniel Burrows <

Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION

2002-05-18 Thread Marc Leeman
> > http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=17631. This package is compiled > > against the 1.0-2880 version of the NVidia drivers (nvidia: loading > > NVIDIA NVdriver Kernel Module 1.0-2880 Tue Mar 26 08:12:38 PST 2002) > > and was built with winex-compile.sh v0.97." > E, why? Because I compil

Bug#147305: ITP: yepp -- A DESCRIPTION

2002-05-18 Thread Marc Leeman
"Haast en Spoed zijn zelden Goed" would be a Dutch/Flemish proverb to explain this, ... Anyway, a second and improved effort :) The package is available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/yepp deb http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/ On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 10:24:25PM +010

Bug#147335: ITP: hevea-doc -- Documentation for HeVeA

2002-05-18 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: hevea-doc Version : 1.06 Upstream Author : Luc Maranget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://pauillac.inria.fr/~maranget/hevea/ * License : Free Document Dissemination Licence (see below) User documentation (tutori

Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION

2002-05-18 Thread Peter Makholm
Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=17631. This package is compiled > against the 1.0-2880 version of the NVidia drivers (nvidia: loading > NVIDIA NVdriver Kernel Module 1.0-2880 Tue Mar 26 08:12:38 PST 2002) > and was built with winex-compile.sh v0.97.

Bug#89957: Can I adopt it?

2002-05-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:17:15PM +1000, Davor Balder wrote: > I have been playing a lot with PostgreSQL recently. Could I adopt this > package? I am really interested! I've cc'ed the maintainer of mpsql here for an answer to this question; if you just mail the bug number of a WNPP bug like this