Hi Folks,
About three years ago, When we talked about this the last time
around, in the summer on 2000, there were two camp, with two wildly
different interpretations of the constitution, regarding section
4.1.5 of the constitution. This amendment was proposed to resolve
that ambiguity.
Hi Folks,
About three years ago, When we talked about this the last time
around, in the summer on 2000, there were two camp, with two wildly
different interpretations of the constitution, regarding section
4.1.5 of the constitution. This amendment was proposed to resolve
that ambiguity.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One nit:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00058.html
Jochen Voss == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joe Nahmias == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One nit:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00058.html
Jochen Voss == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joe Nahmias == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks
All three proposals have now acquired five or more seconds. Here's the
updated list with links (and all addresses changed to @debian.org):
Original proposal, with amendment BR2
BR2 was accepted by Manoj Srivastava as a modi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grrr, I seconded the wrong one before...
I hearby second the following proposal.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here is a spell checked version, and also one that removes the
> modify clause for the f
Seconded.
> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
>4.1. Powers
>
> Together, the Developers may:
> 1. Appoint or recall the Project Leader.
> 2. Amend this constitution, provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
> 3. Override any decision by the Projec
All three proposals have now acquired five or more seconds. Here's the
updated list with links (and all addresses changed to @debian.org):
Original proposal, with amendment BR2
BR2 was accepted by Manoj Srivastava as a modi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hearby second this amendment.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson wrote:
> I propose the following amendment:
>
> - 5.2 The Foundation Documents are the works entitled "Debian
> - Social Contract" and "Debian Free Software Guid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hearby second this proposal.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
- -- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi folks,
>
> Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating
> Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors
Here's the current status. If anybody has any more non-typographical
changes to make, now would be the time to say so.
Original proposal, with amendment BR2
BR2 was accepted by Manoj Srivastava as a modification to his orig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grrr, I seconded the wrong one before...
I hearby second the following proposal.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here is a spell checked version, and also one that removes the
> modify clause for the f
Seconded.
> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
>4.1. Powers
>
> Together, the Developers may:
> 1. Appoint or recall the Project Leader.
> 2. Amend this constitution, provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
> 3. Override any decision by the Projec
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:16:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:29:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > ==
> >
> > 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
> >
> >4.1. Powe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hearby second this amendment.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson wrote:
> I propose the following amendment:
>
> - 5.2 The Foundation Documents are the works entitled "Debian
> - Social Contract" and "Debian Free Software Guid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hearby second this proposal.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
- -- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi folks,
>
> Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating
> Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors
Here's the current status. If anybody has any more non-typographical
changes to make, now would be the time to say so.
Original proposal, with amendment BR2
BR2 was accepted by Manoj Srivastava as a modification to his orig
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:16:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:29:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > ==
> >
> > 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
> >
> >4.1. Powe
18 matches
Mail list logo