Hi,
I have a computer that I wish to install debian to. The problem is that
the only bootable device I have is a usb floppy drive, I have a usb cd-rom
as well, but not bootable.
I wan't to be able to boot the installation from my usb floppy and the
continue to use the cd-rom och even a net-insta
I tried that, but I couldn't get those images to work... any special
arguments I should need to post to boot:?
/Peter
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Nano Nano wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:52:41PM +0000, peter a wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have a computer that
But that would only work with the so far unstable Sarge-release? As this
is a server install I would prefer a stable release.. or is it possible
to use the installer too boot a Woody installation?
/peter a
On 2004-01-17 16:10, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
peter a wrote:
SNIP
Peter:
have
Hi all,
I'm a bit lost as to how to proceed here, and the dh-kpatches.html file and man
dh_installkpatches are totally confusing me at this point in time.
I'm trying to find a way to get the Via EPIA kernel patch into a standard Debian patch
form to apply to a custom kernel. I hope that makes s
Hi all,
I'm trying to get very basic routing happening between two locally connected subnets
on Debian Sarge.
I'm doing some disaster recovery planning at work which requires me to test some
replication with two subnets connected by an IPSec tunnel, but for my testing I'm just
routing between
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:12:46 +1000
"Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to get very basic routing happening between two locally connected subnets
> on Debian Sarge.
>
> I'm doing some disaster recovery pla
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to Mozilla
Firebird?
I'm running Sarge on an old P200MMX with 160MB RAM, but Firebird still chews
up a little too much memory.
I've gone down the Blackbox window manager path and am planning on using
Sylpheed for email whi
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Huggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:17:21PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> &g
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
>
> Just check it out then. I'm quite sure dillo know
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
> * Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just wondering i
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:58:50 +0100, Jan Schulz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
> * [28/02/2004 02:47] Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTEC
- Original Message -
From: "David P James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
>
> There's Skipstone, but for some reason it does not appear to be in the
> Debian repository anymore
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:24:29 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been some time since I last used Sylpheed, but one can set specific
> reply-to behaviours for each mail directory. For a GUI client Sylpheed
> isn't too bad -- Too bad it isn't a threaded client though. I disliked
> the
Hi all,
I'm experiencing a minor issue with fetchmail 6.2.4.
There is one message in my mailbox at my ISP that fetchmail sees but won't delete or
anything.
When it goes to retrieve this message, it has an NDR message: SMTP error: 451 4.1.8
Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not re
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:21:01 +
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You don't tell us what the full mailchain is - where is fetchmail feeding.
>
> It looks like whatever fetchmail is passing this to, it is rejecting the
> sender address, because it can't look it up, and so fetchmai
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:00:08 -0500
Lou Losee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dont know if this is the right solution for you, however, I have in the
> past had problems with fetchmail refusing to fetch a msg from my ISP due to what it
> deemed to be incorrect headers.
>
> When this occurs, I manua
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:54:24 +0100
Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this error message comes from your MTA side e.g. in my case sendmail. In
> cf.README you find:
>
> [...]
>
> Notice: domains which are temporarily unresolvable are (temporarily)
> rejected with a 451 reply
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:42:37 -0700
CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can also tell fetchmail to use a different mda for a single session
> to pipe it through a procmail for those troublesome messages. Something
> like:
> fetchmail --mda /usr/bin/procmail
> IIRC
>
> Check the fetch
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:57:01 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No it doesn't thread the processes. In other words one can't do anything
> while one is downloading e-mail. The application is locked, until that
> I/O finishes.
Ahh ok, in that case this situation has been resolved. I ca
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:48:53 +
Charlie Grosvenor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just upgraded to exim4 and now I cannot send large messages (50mb), I
> have increased the limit in the file:
>
> /etc/exim4/conf.d/main/01_exim4-config_listmacrosdefs
>
> MESSAGE_SIZE_LIMIT = 1000M
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:14:56 +
Chris Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can anyone help? The only alternative I can see looming is to spend
> about a third as much as I paid for the entire machine on a totally
> unnecessarily fast quadport Intel card (I need three ports and only
> have
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:54:24 +0100
Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this error message comes from your MTA side e.g. in my case sendmail. In
> cf.README you find:
>
> [...]
>
> Notice: domains which are temporarily unresolvable are (temporarily)
> rejected with a 451 reply c
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:04:46 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah really?! You can read/write an e-mail while Sylpheed is pulling
> down mesages? Cool -- not being able to b4 is the primary reason I
> left it, for Mozilla.
>
> I liked it's ability to reply with higlighted materia
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:37:52 +0100
Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) Did you recreate the sendmail.cf file with e.g. sendmailconfig.
Yep, I ran sendmailconfig telling it to use the existing files.
> 2) No I only have the feature added to my sendmail.mc.
There goes that idea :-)
Hi all,
I'm experiencing a major drama whereby mimedefang is segfaulting after what I believe
to be the latest Perl update.
I've posted a query on the mimedefang list and so far it looks to be a perl issue of
some sort causing the segfault.
Is anyone else experiencing this and if so have you r
Hi all,
I need to find out when my perl version was upgraded, and I can use dpkg to verify the
fact that it's installed, but I can't seem to find a way to display *when* it was
installed.
Any hints? Or am I missing something obvious in a manpage or something?
Pete
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 21:50:26 +1000
"Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to find out when my perl version was upgraded, and I can use dpkg to verify
> the fact that it's installed, but I can't seem to find a way to display *when* i
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:13:00 +
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, but there's no facility in dpkg to log installations at the
> moment: it's a long-standing enhancement request. You either have to do
> it yourself, or use aptitude which I believe has installation logging
>
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:21:03 +1000
"Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:13:00 +
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm sorry, but there's no facility in dpkg to log installations at the
>
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:18:46 +
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:00:43AM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote:
> > Another possibility would be looking at the dates on the files for
> > the package in /var/lib/dpkg/info.
>
> Oh yes, the *.list files would do that. (A
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:37:52 +0100
Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Peter A. Cole wrote:
>
> > Hi again Oliver,
> >
> > I've added the first part you suggested above and double checked the readme file
> > to ensure my synta
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 05:22:09 +0800
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's several minutes thru my modem connection, and the icewm ppp
> traffic meter is still quite high even though my wwwoffle fetch is
> over, noffle is over, exim, fetchmail are over, and mozilla is quiet.
>
> How frustr
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 04:20:32 +0100
Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004, Peter A. Cole wrote:
>
> > After adding this, both messages were delivered and consequently directed to my
> > spamdrop by mimedefang.
>
> What exactly did you add to
On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 18:02:32 -0800
Number Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 12:54:39PM +1100, Mathew Meins wrote:
> > The Bin Laden one appears to ridicule him, from what I can see at the URL you
> > posted. I really don't know what you're complaining about.
>
> The Saddam
On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 18:53:03 -0800
Number Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 12:43:15PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> > In fact, I think you'll find the company's laughing because of this sudden
> > increase in interest of their website.
>
Hi there,
I'm currently running Debian Woody 3.0 r1 on my home Internet gateway box,
and I've just removed DNSMasq and put BIND 9 in place instead.
This was working fine, DNS lookups are happy, the other PC's can surf the
net and all that with correct name resolution and local name resolution is
DDNS capabilities of Bind 9 and dhcp3.
I no longer have erroneous dial-ups.
Just thought I'd post this in case any else experiences a similar situation.
Pete
- Original Message -
From: "Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Januar
Hi all,
I've just set up my mail server of sorts here which is running Debian Sarge
with Exim4, Fetchmail, Procmail, and QPopper. All my packages are up to date
as of today.
I'm trying to set it up so I can send internal mail without going via my ISP
and external mail with address rewriting going
Hi again all,
Sorry if I'm being impatient, but this is frustrating me no end.
The original post is below, and even if someone can just point me to some
easier reading info than the Exim specification then that would be most
welcome.
Thanks,
Pete
- Original Message -
From: &qu
- Original Message -
From: "Kianusch Sayah Karadji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 7:50 PM
Subject: Unofficial HP/Compaq Drivers/Config Utilities for Debian
> Hi!
>
> After some days working on an ML370/DL380 I've written a script to
> automat
Hi all,
I'm using logcheck to get notifications on my Debian Sarge box, but I would
really like to get rid of a few extra messages that can be ignored. The
entries I want to ignore are:
Feb 16 20:49:38 jake in.qpopper[2843]: connect from 10.200.50.152
Feb 16 20:49:38 jake in.qpopper[2843]: (v4.0.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Brazil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: Debian Sarge Logcheck Query
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:02:18PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> > I'm using
- Original Message -
From: "Nate Duehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian-User users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: Unofficial HP/Compaq Drivers/Config Utilities for Debian
> On Feb 16, 2004, at 3:17 AM, Peter A
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Verbovetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Exim4 Sender Address Rewriting
> I did the following:
>
> 1. Created normal /etc/email-addresses
>
> 2. Commented out the relevant par
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Brazil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 5:47 AM
Subject: Re: Debian Sarge Logcheck Query
> Just a thought - if you don't get any messages how do you know that your
> machine hasn't been compromised and logchec
Hi all,
Does anyone know if there are plans to produce a MIMEDefang package with
dependencies on Exim rather than sendmail?
It seems a little odd that Debian uses Exim by default, but the MIMEDefang
package provided with Sarge depends on sendmail...
Pete
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: Debian Sarge MIMEDefang with Exim
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:40:48PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> > Does an
- Original Message -
From: "Al Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: Debian Sarge MIMEDefang with Exim
> Here's a better idea. Ask him why. Probably he doesn't consider it to
> be as bug. Maybe "upstream" requires send
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Verbovetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Exim4 Sender Address Rewriting
Dear Peter,
Unfortunately, I don't have further ideas, this doesn't happen for me.
Maybe you have an ol
- Original Message -
From: "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: Debian Sarge MIMEDefang with Exim
>
> There's a wishlist category; this is probably the category you would
> want.
>
> --
> monique
>
Thank
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Debian Sarge MIMEDefang with Exim
> We have the mail-transport-agent virtual package so that packages don't
> have to depend on individual MTAs,
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up a home mail server here (have had previous posts re:
Exim) and I've discovered I now need to concentrate on sendmail due to
wanting to utilise the benefits of mimedefang.
Anyway, what I really need is a pointer in the direction of some
documentation or advice on wheth
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: Home Mail Server
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:23:22PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> &
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: Home Mail Server
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:23:22PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> &
- Original Message -
From: "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 3:23 AM
Subject: Re: Home Mail Server
> On 2004-02-19, Peter A. Cole penned:
> >
> > Anyway, what I really need
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 5:22 AM
Subject: Re: Home Mail Server
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Let them go to /var/mail. If the users want it to go elsewhere,
> there's pro
> The points I can think of:
>
> 1. The mail storage type the pop3 or imap server you are going to use to
>give your users access to their mail requires. (I use courier-imap
>which only works with maildirs so there wasn't much choice in that
>case).
I'm going to be using qpopper for th
* Peter A. Cole ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040219 03:24]:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to set up a home mail server here (have had previous posts re:
> Exim) and I've discovered I now need to concentrate on sendmail due to
> wanting to utilise the benefits of mimedefang.
I&#x
- Original Message -
From: "Vineet Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: Home Mail Server
>Yes, you should be able to find information on the web. Look for a
>document called exiscan-acl-spec.txt .
>
>I'm using exiscan-
- Original Message -
From: "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: Home Mail Server
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:51:41AM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> > - Original Message -
&
Hi all,
Hopefully just a quick one...
If I run modconf, then remove all the modules I don't need (like every
single IDE driver known to the kernel), then I run update-modules, is this
supposed to reload all the modules I just removed at the next reboot?
If my guess at the working of this is righ
- Original Message -
From: "Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:02 PM
Subject: Debian Sarge Modconf and update-modules Clarification Needed
> Hi all,
>
> Hopefully just a quick one...
>
>
Hi all,
I've got a bit of a strange question in relation to IMAP, POP3, and Procmail.
My mail server here at home currently running Debian Sarge uses a combination of
fetchmail, sendmail, and procmail to deliver email to my local accounts.
I have done nothing with procmail, so everything gets d
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 22:29:15 -0700
"Loren M. Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious about how many people are actually using Debian Unstable
> or Testing to Stable for normal desktop use or even a production
> server. I've being using Gentoo lately, and I love how nice the newer
> software
Hi all,
I'm probably doing something stupid here, but I can't seem to get the current official
Sarge ISO image from Jigdo to work.
I jigdo'd the CD last night and booted my Dell notebook off it today, but it tells me
I don't have a valid Debian CD.
When jigdo finished, it told me the image sho
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 07:13:11 -0500
hugo vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hugo,
> But as final step he checks the checksums, did he do
Yes, jigdo said the checksums were fine.
>
> How did this fail? What does cdrecord say?
>
The cdrecord process didn't actually fail, it completed succe
Hello,
today I made a mistake. I thought it's quite time to move old mails from
my inbox to an archive folder. I created the folder, selected the mails,
right-click, move to folder. It took some time (~2000 emails, ~300Megs).
Then opened the new folder, and to my surprise, every email was
dup
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's nothing like humiliating yourself in a public forum.
- pedro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
70 matches
Mail list logo
