I'm running into the same problem with php3.
I have uncommented the line
LoadModule php3_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp3.so
As well as the the two "AddType" lines, and still apache doesn't load php3 when
I try viewing my .php3 files.
Has anyone run into this problem also?
// joey tsai
Whenever I use Nautilus, then close its window, its process still sticks around
and I have to kill it manually. I'm assuming this is a "feature." Can anyone
shed light on this?
I'm using unstable.
// joey tsai
> Any other choices aside Mozilla, Opera, Netscape, for something low
> footprint?
I'm really impressed with the new nightly CVS builds of Galeon lately.
http://galeon.sourceforge.net
For fast text-based browsers, I use links.
apt-get install links
// joey tsai
Hi, I just downloaded the newest version of lame (3.87) and I'm having problems
compiling. The error message I'm getting is:
gcc -DNDEBUG -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -ffast-math
-finline-functions -Wall -pedantic -DBRHIST -DHAVEGTK -DUSE_LAYER_2
-DUSE_LAYER_1 -DHAVEMPGLIB -DLAMESNDF
Hi,
I can't seem to get apache to load the php module and to process my .php3 pages.
I have the
LoadModule php3_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp3.so
line uncommented in /etc/apache/httpd.conf, and I've restarted the server. Does
anyone know what could be wrong? THanks,
// joey tsai
Yeah, I do. :/
// joey tsai
:: Rick Rezinas ::
> hello,
>
> do you have a line like
>
> AddType application/x-httpd-php3 .php
> AddType application/x-httpd-php3 .php3
>
> uncommented in there too?
Well, "httpd" doesn't seem to be a valid command, but "apache -l" does give:
Compiled-in modules:
http_core.c
mod_so.c
mod_macro.c
suexec: enabled; valid wrapper /usr/lib/apache/suexec
// joey tsai
:: Rick Rezinas ::
> does running
> httpd -l
>
> show the following modules installed?
Hi all,
I installed debian on another machine, but for some reason, junkbuster isn't
running. I mean, it runs, and it shows up in a ps, but the proxy isn't
working... plus trying telnet won't connect to the port... any suggestions?
// joey tsai
> I have the dvorak keymap loaded for myy everyday use in consoles, but
> after upgrading to X-4 it insists on using a qwerty layout. How do I
> set up X to use the dvorak keyboard layout?
>
Put this in your .xinitrc:
setxkbmap dvorak
// joey tsai
Hi, has anyone gotten the jvm plugin working with Mozilla 0.8? I've been able
to download it, install it (I got the "Installation successful" screen), but
when I restart the browser and try "about:plugins" - the plugin doesn't show up.
// joey tsai
:: christophe barbe ::
> I believe you need to enable java in edit/preferences/advances.
Yeah, I had it enabled. If it isn't enabled, then you won't even get the prompt
for the plugin to download. Any other hints?
// joey tsai
:: Chung, Ha-Nyung ::
> Installing mozilla0.8-dev may solve the problem. Even though it is not just
> mozilla0.8-dev package that really solve it, some package on which
> mozilla0.8-dev depends on seems to be able to.
I just installed mozilla-dev and reinstalled the plugin, but still no luck. :
:: William Leese ::
> Moz installs the plugins in the wrong dir.. remove the plugins subdirectory
> in your moz dir. and link it to the directory where the plugins are
> installed. Or cp/mv the plugins to that directory
Could you be more specific? Moz installs to which wrong subdirectory? And
:: DvB ::
> This is actually a known issue with 0.8 (should be in the release notes,
> I think...). To fix it, make a symlink in $MOZDIR/plugins which points
> to the actual library file (I for get where it is... something like
> java1.2/plugin/i386/ns600).
[corban][03:02pm][/usr/lib/mozilla/pl
:: Ross Boylan ::
> Is this a bug with anything, or just an inevitable result of trying to put
> unlike things (ximian and debian) together?
If you are running unstable (sid), you should not be running Ximian's Gnome.
Purge their packages (they have ximian or helix in their version) and use
Debian
> Since I've been running "sid" and Ximian's Gnome packages, until I did
> an "apt-get dist-upgrade" yesterday, I saw no problems. Then, I ran into
> a similar problem as the original poster -- there was a debian package
> newer than the ximian one and it caused a brief headache.
>
> Why exactly s
16 matches
Mail list logo
