On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 03:29:37 +0100
David selby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would there be much of a speed increase, enough to warrent doing it ?
Yes.
(You can listen people saying "no"; but those people can't prove
how its posible that a optimized compilation of some apps seems to make
a difere
Hi, i'm running debian sid up-to-date; i was wondering
if the libc6 2.3.1-17 libc6 package has the latest NTPL changes needed to
get the maximum performance with threads in the 2.5 development kernel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 07:34:34 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Minutes wasted for milliseconds gained. Still seem worth it?
No. Indeed. That's the main reason i dislike gentoo. They're braindead.
It's worth of it when you're for example in stable, when you compile it
one time for
On 11 Jun 2003 22:04:46 +0200
Tinus Kotzé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> 1) I am running debian unstable and tried kernel 2.5.69. when I install
> it however, it comes passed the point saying "Loading kernel", then
> the bios check. Then after the Uncompressing kernel it freezes. I
> dis
On 15 Jun 2003 21:09:22 +0200
Mario Vukelic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say it's really worth it, and from my brief encounter with Gentoo
> I'd suspect that most of Gentoo's perceived speed is because of the
> kernel (they offer the CK kernel in portage, but as I understand also
> the stock
On 27 Jun 2003 12:39:05 +0700
Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any issues I should aware of in installing the Kernel version
> 2.5.44 on Sid? Would there any problem with modutils?
You should be aware that 2.5 is a development kernel, you should update
to the latest, 2.5.73
El Sun, 06 Jul 2003 21:12:42 +0100 Shango Oluwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Why, if 2.4.x is more recent & secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD distribution
> built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
Obviously you haven't looked at the latest security issues in 2.4.X kernels.
BTW; the default 2.4.18-bf2.4 at
El 13 Jul 2003 13:25:10 -0500 Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> for? I'm going to be using make-kpkg and friends to do all the work. Any
> issues with that? Also, how about .config? Can I just copy over my
> 2.4.21 .config and add new selections as necessary?
Well, currently we've
k
El 02 Aug 2003 17:48:45 -0500 Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Personally I find reportbug plenty easy enough. Though for a web
> interface, I'd think it would be quite easy to write a web front-end for
> reportbug. Then again, it would be about as easy to write a web
> front-end fr
El Sun, 3 Aug 2003 02:40:44 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
[I'm also the [EMAIL PROTECTED] guy; BTW. Trying to avoid antispam systems for
my ISP]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Sat, 2 Aug 2003 22:38:03 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Well, considering so many other things require an MTA (cron, anacron,
> at, most MUAs), and exim is part of the base system, why don't you
> have one properly configured and installed?
Because i don't need to do it. Th
El Sun, 3 Aug 2003 04:42:49 +0100 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> It's on the wishlist
Cool
> No, this is vanishingly unlikely.
Sure, i don't say i like bugzilla; but currently it allows doing some things
the BTS can't do.
Thanks for the job you're doing at the BTS!
--
To UNSUB
El Mon, 04 Aug 2003 23:05:47 +0200 "A. Loonstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> When I run make-kpkg kernel-image I fails around riscom8.o. I tried
> several settings and downgraded to gcc-2.95, no help.
Know bug: http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153
The driver hasn't been ported (still)
El Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:58:17 -0500 Lindsey Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 007c
That isn't a ps bug, it's a kernel bug.
Please pass it through ksymoops and send a full bug report to
the kernel lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
14 matches
Mail list logo
