I am trying to get a webserver to run under my regular user, or at least
to have the website's files under control of my regular user, but the
webserver runs as www-data.
But it seems I cannot do chgrp as a user.
Is there any way to achieve this?
I mean I could add my user's group to the www-
deloptes schreef op 23-12-2016 0:40:
perhaps you want to chown your-user.www-data /path
or something like
php5 -S : Run with built-in web server.
Give up the bad ideas, seriously!
I think my point was more that I didn't know how to chgrp, but I found I
needed to add myself to www-data firs
Dan Ritter schreef op 22-12-2016 20:04:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 06:24:59PM +0100, Xen wrote:
I am trying to get a webserver to run under my regular user, or at
least to
have the website's files under control of my regular user, but the
webserver
runs as www-data.
But it seems I cann
Greg Wooledge schreef op 23-12-2016 14:07:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 01:17:23AM +0100, Xen wrote:
Life becomes a whole lot easier if you can do stuff with your regular
user, which is why I am putting stuff in my user home directory in the
first place, instead of some central location.
Making
Nicolas George schreef op 23-12-2016 9:32:
Le tridi 3 nivôse, an CCXXV, Xen a écrit :
I think my point was more that I didn't know how to chgrp, but I found
I
needed to add myself to www-data first before I could chgrp to it.
Just a basic sanity check:
If your web server is running a
Muhammad Yousuf Khan schreef op 27-12-2016 12:22:
can you guys please guide what is going on . in old Debian version i
do this with no problem sub interfaces were very easy task. but here i
invest the whole day.
I must say I have run into many problems on my own machine but never
this one.
Muhammad Yousuf Khan schreef op 27-12-2016 13:58:
I didnt route anything as default gateway was already there. can you
please explain your routes more. i didnt get the context of that
routes you define.
Nothing special there, if you use the same gateway it won't be needed. I
just have a 2nd IP
Gene Heskett schreef op 27-12-2016 15:51:
Since they create lost of files those programs typically create those
files as the user the webserver is running as, which would typically
be www-data. Sometimes you want to be able those files directly as a
user outside of the application (which is typi
Muhammad Yousuf Khan schreef op 27-12-2016 15:15:
Thanks this is what i already did and i was about to send you guys the
details and fortunately your msg comes in.
tcpdump is telling me very interesting story.
when i 'tcpdump -i eth3 icmp' it shows all the ping packet that are
received for ip 50.
deloptes schreef op 27-12-2016 21:05:
You are an i**ot I would immediately fire. Start reading the interfaces
and
using the programs as designed. If you want to do things your own way I
do
not want to know about it.
Nobody asked you about it. You should stop feeling addressed as if you
were
Greg Wooledge schreef op 27-12-2016 22:44:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:43:19PM +0100, Xen wrote:
Wrong does not exist.
Irony.
It is perfectly acceptable to do things a different way.
It is also perfectly clear that many tools such as Dokuwiki do not
provide the tools that perhaps Mediawiki
Xen schreef op 27-12-2016 22:54:
What I do works and provides a solution. What you do is complain and
you do not provide anything, save for yourself, but I am not helped
with that, nor is anyone else if you complain like that.
Now enough.
Lost my temper there, Winston would say. Yes, I play
Muhammad Yousuf Khan schreef op 28-12-2016 8:10:
Thanks issue is resolved. as i mentioned tcpdump command not receving
packets from ISP gateway. thus we discussed this matter with ISP and
the restarted the router. and things got fixed. it seems that ISP
router keeps the old MAC entries thats why
Xen schreef op 27-12-2016 23:13:
Lost my temper there, Winston would say. Yes, I play video games too.
What's the problem with that? You have a problem with that too? :).
Also still want to add, If I may.
That even Mediawiki probably doesn't provide all the tools you'd need
do...@mail.com schreef op 26-12-2016 3:41:
I encountered this many times on windowz FAT32 in a non-root dir, but
never on Linux. I suspect that it was/is one of their "Features". The
said "Feature" still was there when using ntfs in XP if I remember
correctly.
Perhaps it's just because Windows
deloptes schreef op 28-12-2016 20:17:
Xen wrote:
Xen schreef op 27-12-2016 23:13:
Lost my temper there, Winston would say. Yes, I play video games too.
What's the problem with that? You have a problem with that too? :).
Also still want to add, If I may.
No need to be so sensiti
Lisi Reisz schreef op 29-12-2016 13:58:
On Thursday 29 December 2016 02:31:49 Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/28/2016 4:07 PM, Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:20:06 -0600
>
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>> Raspberry (sp?) Pi's have the compute power. But their form
>> factor is terminally CLUNKY.
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz schreef op 29-12-2016 14:44:
[sorry for the late response.]
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:05:48AM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
It is not easy to describe a program with many use cases and even
more particular settings and actions.
What lacks to my experience as confused
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:05:48AM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
What lacks to my experience as confused reader and as best effort
writer
is the user's view on the programs. man pages should document the
details
and often do sufficiently.
But the user looks for solutions, not opportunities.
Greg Wooledge schreef op 29-12-2016 16:59:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 09:53:28AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I added these two lines to /etc/fstab:
/dev/sda7 /media/sda7 ext2users,rw 0 0
/dev/sda8 /media/sda8 ext2users,rw 0 0
All users can mount and
Catherine Gramze schreef op 29-12-2016 19:31:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Xen wrote:
But if you are going to say the purpose of a man page is to be a
complete reference guide unto its options, then you will write dirt
poor man pages. That is all I can say here
.
But that is
Catherine Gramze schreef op 29-12-2016 19:31:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Xen wrote:
But if you are going to say the purpose of a man page is to be a
complete reference guide unto its options, then you will write dirt
poor man pages. That is all I can say here
.
But that is
Re Lisi:
"No. The problem here is that the overlap between highly competent
technical
people (who find tech fun) and people who love writing, and find writing
fun,
is so small. I personally know one, and he is not a developer.
Developers
love developing. Writers love writing. Neither re
Catherine Gramze schreef op 29-12-2016 19:47:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Xen wrote:
More importantly the man system or man format does not preclude such
documents being written as tutorials so basically it is being done
all around.
So your assertion here does not really have a basis in
rhkra...@gmail.com schreef op 30-12-2016 3:23:
My suggestion is you spend less time discussing it, and get started on
writing
a few bman pages...
So your suggestion is to start using a system that doesn't exist and
instead of having discussion about how this system should be designed,
you a
Lisi Reisz schreef op 30-12-2016 3:31:
On Friday 30 December 2016 01:37:53 Xen wrote:
Re Lisi:
You clearly find wittering on yourself more fun than actually reading
what
other people have written. You have actually quoted my precise words,
then
accused me in your paraphrase of having said
Catherine Gramze schreef op 30-12-2016 4:32:
Ad hominem attacks now, Xen, since you cannot refute the simple
fact that man pages were designed to be a reference, not a
tutorial?
If the topic is attitudes, then those belong to people don't they?
You'll need examples, won't y
You know, at risk of contradicting myself here.
rhkra...@gmail.com schreef op 30-12-2016 3:23:
There is noting magic about man pages--what I'm trying to say is that,
someone
could start writing something similar to man pages, with all the detail
or
introductory / explanatory material you (they)
Thomas Schmitt schreef op 31-12-2016 11:59:
Well, "info" is the pet of GNU and thus often better documentation for
GNU tools than their "man" pages.
The goal and viewpoint is nevertheless the same: Technical
documentation
of programs, not tutorial.
I personally also cannot use "info". I have
rhkra...@gmail.com schreef op 31-12-2016 15:12:
But, info pages could work.
Yes, let's propose that. They are just impossible to navigate if you are
not an insider.
The fact that pretty much no one uses them is not a red herring at all.
to...@tuxteam.de schreef op 31-12-2016 10:35:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 07:38:18AM +0100, Xen wrote:
do...@mail.com schreef op 26-12-2016 3:41:
>I encountered this many times on windowz FAT32 in a non-root dir, but
>never on Linux. I suspect that it was/is one of their "Features&
Lisi Reisz schreef op 31-12-2016 10:30:
Which make me bad at writing?
Lisi
Refusing to write good documentation on purpose.
Lisi Reisz schreef op 31-12-2016 10:37:
On Saturday 31 December 2016 08:48:09 Xen wrote:
Oh and yes, mentioning someone else's behaviour to another person is
not
an ad hominem attack Catherine.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ad+homonem&oq=ad+homonem&aqs=chrome..69i57.3014
Lisi Reisz schreef op 31-12-2016 10:37:
Yes, I know, I am not good at it.
That makes you insincere as well because you do not even agree with what
you say, you do not even agree with your own wisdom. You do one thing
and say another, which makes me feel you realize *deep down* that I am
act
Lisi Reisz schreef op 01-01-2017 13:00:
On Sunday 01 January 2017 11:52:20 Xen wrote:
Lisi Reisz schreef op 31-12-2016 10:30:
> Which make me bad at writing?
>
> Lisi
Refusing to write good documentation on purpose.
"%(&_++**!&
And what is that supposed to mean? You
Xen schreef op 01-01-2017 13:18:
"and that you wanted your specific solution laid out for you in the
man page instead of figuring it out yourself"
and "should abandon the noob mindset".
Those are just insults to begin with and they ARE ad hominems in actual
fact.
deloptes schreef op 01-01-2017 14:09:
Xen wrote:
And what is that supposed to mean? You are really acting like a child
now.
LOL - she makes fun of you - you just have to stop. I am not reading
your
comments any more - there is no value in them.
She was not making fun of me. She was just
Thomas Schmitt schreef op 01-01-2017 14:10:
From the viewpoint of "info" programmers it is obvious that you first
have to learn how to use it before you can draw benefit from it.
But the particular user has a particular need to get information about
a particular complex of problems. No interes
Eike Lantzsch schreef op 01-01-2017 17:58:
Interestingly enough the motto of 33. Chaos Communication Congress in
Hamburg
was: "Works for me". They aimed at getting programmers out of their
lethargy
because their software not only has to "work for them" but also for
everybody
else. An interest
Lisi thought she had to go through the effort of personally telling me
she has used some Exim killfile or something of the kind to give my
emails special treatment, but maybe she just uses Gmail for that, I
don't know.
I guess that means I get to say things about her that she won't hear.
Grea
deloptes schreef op 01-01-2017 14:09:
Xen wrote:
And what is that supposed to mean? You are really acting like a child
now.
LOL - she makes fun of you - you just have to stop. I am not reading
your
comments any more - there is no value in them.
One last thing before I unsubscribe again
I am not subscribed and I don't actually have an email reader that can
respond to mailto: links, but...
Xen wrote:
[...]; call it the Linux Support Arena, or the Linux Support Agenda
even, people on the side take on the customer support role of
filtering.
They act like they try to ge
I am currently running a red hat derivative linux and an looking to change to
debian (as reports speak highly of it). However, it seems from looking at the
list of shells packaged with debian it does not come with the bash shell - it
this right ??
If this is not the correct place to ask this q
43 matches
Mail list logo
