On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:43:03PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald uttered:
> After over 10 years of faithful service (essentially when I ditched pine),
> I am considering having my mutt put down. Should I move over to gmail, or is
> there some amazing scriptable GUI mail client that is going to knock my
>
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:24:23AM +0200, Regid Ichira uttered:
>
> As some of you might know, the transition to dependency based
> boot / insserv is causing the following lines:
>
> insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 6) of script `ntp'
> overwrites defaults (empty).
>
>
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 09:46:45AM -0400, Stephen Powell uttered:
> You're welcome to search our archives. But don't post here unless you
> run Debian, want to know how your system works, and are willing to help
> others as well as yourself. I'm not trying to be unkind. I have nothing
> against
Hi,
I have an problem while using gtk-recordMyDesktop Version: 0.3.8-3 with
my desktop environment, Xfce 4.6.1. Both these applications are from an
up-to-date Sid laptop.
What happens is when I go to record a session; the recordMyDesktop
application disappears as it's supposed to so the screen i
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:28:54AM +0100, Adam Hardy uttered:
> I figure this is probably something I would have to script myself
> because I can't find anything useful looking out there, but I thought
> I'd ask before I try (or perhaps before I procrastinate again):
>
> I have a machine here at h
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 07:01:48AM +, Camaleón uttered:
> On Thu, 13 May 2010 19:17:14 -0400, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
>
> > I have an problem while using gtk-recordMyDesktop Version: 0.3.8-3 with
> > my desktop environment, Xfce 4.6.1. Both these applications are from an
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:06:04AM +0200, godo uttered:
> On 05/14/2010 01:17 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have an problem while using gtk-recordMyDesktop Version: 0.3.8-3 with
> >my desktop environment, Xfce 4.6.1. Both these applications are from
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 07:14:18AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III uttered:
> On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 06:52 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> > Look at PDF. PDF became a ISO/IEC standard but we (at linux) still lack
> > for a PDF editor that can compete with Acrobat Professional.
>
> That comment really stri
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:18:51PM -0400, Stefan Monnier uttered:
> > Look at PDF. PDF became a ISO/IEC standard but we (at linux) still lack
> > for a PDF editor that can compete with Acrobat Professional.
>
> In the GNU/Linux world, being able to edit PDF files is not considered
> as a worthwh
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:08:43AM +0200, Michelle Konzack uttered:
> Hello Steve Fishpaste,
>
> Am 2010-05-14 18:48:21, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > There are some printers that use GNU/FLOSS to you know. 8) Got to be
> > careful being so inclusive. There are many use
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman uttered:
> Op 15-05-10 14:43, Steve Fishpaste schreef:
> > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:08:43AM +0200, Michelle Konzack uttered:
> >> Hello Steve Fishpaste,
> >>
> >> Am 2010-05-14 18:48:21, hacktest Du
Good morning folks.
Why is the Chromium-browser in Sid so old? Chromium has been on the
6.x branch for a couple of weeks now and Debian is still using the 5.x
branch.
In my opinion we should keep up with the new releases at least weekly.
Is this on the agenda to do?
Cheers,
Steve
Toronto
--
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:53:10PM -0400, KS uttered:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >
> > Good question. I now use Google Chrome 5.0.375.38 beta exclusively.
> > I loaded it down from their site. Is there a debian package?
> >
> chromium-browser
It's not current as of this moment though. Debian is
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:38:35PM +0300, Andrei Popescu uttered:
> On Fri,21.May.10, 11:23:15, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > Good morning folks.
> >
> > Why is the Chromium-browser in Sid so old? Chromium has been on the
> > 6.x branch for a couple of weeks now and De
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:39:33AM -0400, Jordan Metzmeier uttered:
> On 05/21/2010 11:23 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> >Good morning folks.
> >
> >Why is the Chromium-browser in Sid so old? Chromium has been on the
> >6.x branch for a couple of weeks now and Debian is st
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:42:16AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. uttered:
> On Friday 21 May 2010 10:23:15 Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > In my opinion we should keep up with the new releases at least weekly.
> > Is this on the agenda to do?
>
> You volunteering? Contact the ma
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:27:35PM -0400, John uttered:
> On 21/05/10, Steve Fishpaste (marathon.duran...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> |
> | Why is the Chromium-browser in Sid so old?
>
> There seem to be three versions of the browser available:
> 1. google-chrome-unstable, c
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:38:02AM -0700, Kelly Clowers uttered:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:23, Steve Fishpaste
> wrote:
> > Good morning folks.
> >
> > Why is the Chromium-browser in Sid so old? Chromium has been on the
> > 6.x branch for a couple of weeks now and
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:41:38AM -0500, John Hasler uttered:
> JohnRChamplin writes:
> > ...which used to be available from unstable, but which I have heard is
> > now in sid.
>
> Unstable _is_ Sid.
>
> In any case, a few weeks is not old.
It is on a fast moving target, and especially in the c
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:18:12AM -0600, Aaron Toponce uttered:
> On 05/24/2010 12:42 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> > It is in experimental, and work fine for me:
>
> ...but we're not talking about experimental now, are we? :)
Yup I was originally as that's where Chromium was at first.
--
To UN
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:50:11AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. uttered:
[ ...] discussion on why I chose Sid on a workstation/laptop.
> I used Etch on my desktop and Laptop for quite a while with little to no loss
> of functionality. I don't really understand why you think you need the
> la
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:27:02AM -0500, John Hasler uttered:
> Steve Fishpaste writes:
> > With Chromium there is no "stable" or "beta" it's a development
> > branch. So being the development branch,
>
> If it truly has no stable (or even beta
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 06:47:43AM -0600, Aaron Toponce uttered:
> On 05/26/2010 05:49 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:18:12AM -0600, Aaron Toponce uttered:
> >> On 05/24/2010 12:42 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> >>> It is in expe
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:10:54PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 07/06/10 02:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd like to know
> > what are gmail users favorite gpg tool ?
> >
>
> Crap! I was using Firegpg for mails to my friend
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:08:11AM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 07/06/10 11:42 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:10:54PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >> On 07/06/10 02:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>>
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:41:39PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 08/06/10 10:39 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:08:11AM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >>
> >> Yes, I agree. In fact, if a mail client like TB or mutt can be used,
>
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:59:44PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
[ ...]
> I realize that, I use both. But I think I already made that clear.
I don't think very much was clear. Anyway you have our suggestions.
> > So what's the problem?
>
> Okay, I will rephrase what I already mentioned in a different
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:22:22PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 10/06/10 10:11 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:59:44PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >>
> >> FireGPG was a pretty neat extension which got around both these problems.
> >
> >
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:46:02PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 10/06/10 10:33 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:22:22PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >> On 10/06/10 10:11 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:59:44PM -0400, H.S.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:03:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland uttered:
> On 11/06/2010 03:33, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > No it's for Thunderbird.
> Therein lies the problem. Are you actually reading H.S.'s posts?
Yes were you? BTW he's not the original poster and I and others w
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:46:32PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 12/06/10 10:50 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:03:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland uttered:
> >> On 11/06/2010 03:33, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> >>> No it's for Thunderbird.
> >>
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:16:16PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 13/06/10 02:24 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:46:32PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >> replying! If you wanted to reply to the OP, you should have done that
> ^^^
32 matches
Mail list logo
