On 2018-11-01 17:57, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:43:56PM +0100, local10 wrote:
Under enp3so I see only BROADCAST and MULTICAST, no UP or DOWN. Thanks
That means it's down. Note that you said enp3so above, that should be
enp3s0 (zero); which did you put in interfaces? Also,
mick crane composed on 2018-11-02 07:22 (UTC):
> I have to do a double check with "l" and "1" and "0" and "O", there
> ought to be some way to avoid that.
Font selection can make a big difference:
http://fm.no-ip.com/Auth/Font/fonts-face-samplesM.html
--
Evolution as taught in public s
On 2018-11-02 07:37, Felix Miata wrote:
mick crane composed on 2018-11-02 07:22 (UTC):
I have to do a double check with "l" and "1" and "0" and "O", there
ought to be some way to avoid that.
Font selection can make a big difference:
http://fm.no-ip.com/Auth/Font/fonts-face-samplesM.h
On 2018-11-02, mick crane wrote:
> On 2018-11-02 07:37, Felix Miata wrote:
>> mick crane composed on 2018-11-02 07:22 (UTC):
>>
>>> I have to do a double check with "l" and "1" and "0" and "O", there
>>> ought to be some way to avoid that.
>>
>> Font selection can make a big difference:
>>
>>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 10:12:36PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
BTW in a network set up like my own, the place where the MAC would be
relevant is in the DHCP server (here, the router) because that is how
the IP number is assigned. An unassigned MAC will get given an IP
address 192.168.1.200+, and i
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 07:58:23AM +, mick crane wrote:
The 0 with a line through it helps but l still looks like 1.
That's still a font selection issue--in the font I'm using it's hard to
confuse the two. (l has an arc of stem to the bottom right, 1 has
straight bilateral serifs. l has a
* Grzesiek Sójka [2018-10-28 11:27 +]:
> Hi there,
>
> I just upgraded Sid and now I get the following during boot:
>
> [] Configuring network interfaces.../etc/init.d/rpcbind: 42:
> /etc/init.d/rpcbind: stat: not found
> /run/rpcbind not owned by root failed!
> Starting NFS common util
Hi all,
Can somebody explain this huge difference between 2 (almost) identical
servers:
-
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=512 count=1024 oflag=sync
524288 bytes (524 kB) copied, 0.00133898 s, 392 MB/s
vs
524
For a while now I noticed that aptitude is very slow on one of my
machine (Thinkpad T61) running Debian testing. At first I thought it
was because its disk (a fairly old 120GB SSD) was suffering from some
kind of problem, so I replaced it with an almost new 240GB Samsung 840.
It seemed to bet bet
Forgot to mention both run Debian (7.1 and 9.5) and filesystems are ext4
on both.
On 02/11/18 11:58, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
Hi all,
Can somebody explain this huge difference between 2 (almost) identical
servers:
---
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:58:48AM +, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=512 count=1024 oflag=sync
That's a uselessly small block size & count. Try again with something
more like bs=128k count=10
Note that your dd test is a write test and your testparm is a read tes
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:31:50AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
It seemed to bet better at first, but maybe it was just an impression.
In any case, now it's definitely very slow. Digging more into it,
I found out that part of the problem seems to be very slow writes to
the disk. I can reproduce
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the suggestion.
New test results with suggested parameters below:
Slower server
W: 1310720 bytes (13 GB, 12 GiB) copied, 97.5106 s, 134 MB/s
R: 1310720 bytes (13 GB, 12 GiB) copied, 28.6353 s, 458 MB/s
Faster server
W: 1310720 bytes (13 GB) copied, 83.7368 s, 15
> > root@joule:/etc/udev# find . -type f -exec grep "eth0" '{}' \; -print
> > #ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
> > ./rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> >
> > eth0 is defined in 70-persistent-net.rules.
> > Why rename it?
From: Reco
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 20
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 01:03:12PM +, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
New test results with suggested parameters below:
Slower server
W: 1310720 bytes (13 GB, 12 GiB) copied, 97.5106 s, 134 MB/s
R: 1310720 bytes (13 GB, 12 GiB) copied, 28.6353 s, 458 MB/s
Faster server
W: 1310720 bytes (1
How does your partition alignment look for that disk?
Or, in other words, what does 'fdisk -l' tell you about this one?
Am 02.11.18 um 13:31 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
> For a while now I noticed that aptitude is very slow on one of my
> machine (Thinkpad T61) running Debian testing. At first I thou
On 2018-11-02, Martin wrote:
> How does your partition alignment look for that disk?
> Or, in other words, what does 'fdisk -l' tell you about this one?
>
The enduring mystery is how he managed to squeeze so little into so
much.
--
When you have fever you are heavy and light, you are small and
>>It seemed to bet better at first, but maybe it was just an impression.
>>In any case, now it's definitely very slow. Digging more into it,
>>I found out that part of the problem seems to be very slow writes to
>>the disk. I can reproduce tests where `dd`ing a 40MB file proceeds at
>>the ridicul
Hello,
I'm seeing some new'ish issues with using screen. In the past, I could
ssh into a remote server, restore a running screen (screen -r) and paste
something I had previously copied. What seems to be happening, and it
started some time in the past 3 months, is that resuming screen clears
the
dpchr...@holgerdanske.com wrote:
>debian-users:
>
>I downloaded debian-9.5.0-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso several months ago via:
>
>https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/jigdo-cd/
- image sounds ok.
- basic d-i setup
>It fails with a pop-up dialog:
>
> [!] Select and install softwar
On Fri 02 Nov 2018 at 07:05:16 (-0400), Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 10:12:36PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > BTW in a network set up like my own, the place where the MAC would be
> > relevant is in the DHCP server (here, the router) because that is how
> > the IP number is assig
On 2018-11-02 11:15, Michael Stone wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 07:58:23AM +, mick crane wrote:
The 0 with a line through it helps but l still looks like 1.
That's still a font selection issue--in the font I'm using it's hard
to confuse the two. (l has an arc of stem to the bottom right,
On 11/2/18 5:31 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
For a while now I noticed that aptitude is very slow on one of my
machine (Thinkpad T61) running Debian testing. At first I thought it
was because its disk (a fairly old 120GB SSD) was suffering from some
kind of problem, so I replaced it with an almost
On 11/2/18 5:17 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
dpchr...@holgerdanske.com wrote:
debian-users:
I downloaded debian-9.5.0-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso several months ago via:
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/jigdo-cd/
- image sounds ok.
- basic d-i setup
It fails with a pop-up dialog:
On Sat 27 Oct 2018 at 11:29:35 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 27 October 2018 11:03:56 Matthew Crews wrote:
>
> > Original Message
> > On Oct 27, 2018, 06:58, Curt wrote:
> >
> > On 2018-10-27, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >> Might be nice, but several of the dependecies
On 11/2/18 6:24 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 02 Nov 2018 at 07:05:16 (-0400), Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 10:12:36PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
BTW in a network set up like my own, the place where the MAC would be
relevant is in the DHCP server (here, the router) because that
On Friday 02 November 2018 23:08:52 David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 27 Oct 2018 at 11:29:35 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 October 2018 11:03:56 Matthew Crews wrote:
> > > Original Message
> > > On Oct 27, 2018, 06:58, Curt wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2018-10-27, Gene Hes
On Fri 02 Nov 2018 at 20:11:03 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
> On 11/2/18 6:24 PM, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 02 Nov 2018 at 07:05:16 (-0400), Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 10:12:36PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > > BTW in a network set up like my own, the place wher
mick crane writes:
> On 2018-11-01 17:57, Michael Stone wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:43:56PM +0100, local10 wrote:
>>> Under enp3so I see only BROADCAST and MULTICAST, no UP or DOWN. Thanks
>>
>> That means it's down. Note that you said enp3so above, that should be
>> enp3s0 (zero); which
On 11/2/18 8:49 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 02 Nov 2018 at 20:11:03 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
On 11/2/18 6:24 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 02 Nov 2018 at 07:05:16 (-0400), Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 10:12:36PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
BTW in a network set up l
30 matches
Mail list logo
