basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread basti
Hello, please add basilisk-browser to debian repo. I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum. More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/ Best Regards,

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread tomas
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 09:01:21AM +0200, basti wrote: > Hello, > please add basilisk-browser to debian repo. Wrong list :-) The right way to do it is to file a RFP (== "Request for Package") bug. The Wiki [1] has more details on that. If you (or someone else) is interested in that, there's a bi

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread Reco
Hi. On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum. > > > > More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/ > > Indeed, it does look good. No, it does not. UXP means Palemoon Browser. Palemoon means extremely h

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread tomas
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:49:44AM +0300, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum. > > > > > > More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/ > > > > Indeed, it does look good. > >

Re: Micro-report: using Stable without systemd

2018-10-18 Thread Morel Bérenger
Le Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:02:23 -0400, Gene Heskett a écrit : > On Wednesday 17 October 2018 05:38:38 Morel Bérenger wrote: > > > Le Wed, 17 Oct 2018 04:40:49 -0400, > > > > Gene Heskett a écrit : > > > On Wednesday 17 October 2018 04:00:37 Morel Bérenger wrote: > > > > Le Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:16:54AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:49:44AM +0300, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum. > > > > > > > > More Infos he

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread Reco
Hi. On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 08:40:51AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > That would mean (in the context of Debian) that one would have to > > (a) use the Basilisk-bundled libs (generally a no-no in Debian) > > or (b) use a different name & brand. Yes, we know this story with > > Firefo

Re: No Java in Eclipse Preferences

2018-10-18 Thread Kent West
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:39 PM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:28:55PM -0500, Kent West wrote: > >westk@westkent64:~$ > >i A eclipse-jdt - Eclipse Java Development Tools (JDT) > >i A eclipse-pde - Eclipse Plug-in Development Environment (PDE) > >i A eclipse

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread basti
On 18.10.2018 16:29, Reco wrote: > If only Debian project did something about Firefox privacy settings. > Let's face it - Mozilla are hypocrites. They loudly 'care about users' > privacy', but then force their 'opt-out telemetry' on you. > Debian's Firefox build disables some of the offending setti

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread Reco
Hi. On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 04:53:19PM +0200, basti wrote: > On 18.10.2018 16:29, Reco wrote: > > If only Debian project did something about Firefox privacy settings. > > Let's face it - Mozilla are hypocrites. They loudly 'care about users' > > privacy', but then force their 'opt-out tele

Re: No Java in Eclipse Preferences

2018-10-18 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 09:48:54AM -0500, Kent West wrote: > >Thanks for your response, Roberto. That helps. I purged all I could find >of Eclipse, and then downloaded their installer from the [2]eclipse.org >website, and then their "Eclipse IDE for Java Developers", and with a >li

Re: No Java in Eclipse Preferences

2018-10-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 19/10/2018 03:48, Kent West wrote: I do feel a little tainted, going outside of the Debian repositories for software. But I understand that in the world of Free Software, there's not always a volunteer available to maintain a package. Fear not. The Eclipse Foundation has fine Open Source cre

Migrating Debian installation to a new motherboard

2018-10-18 Thread local10
Hi, Am looking for an easy way to move my Debian PC to a new motherboard, that is without reinstalling all the packages and config settings. All the hardware with the exception of the motherboard will remain the same, I have a spare hard drive, the same model as my working HD, which I can use a

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread Doug
On 10/18/2018 04:49 AM, Reco wrote: Hi. On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum. More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/ Indeed, it does look good. No, it does not. UXP means Palemoon Browser. P

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread John Crawley
On 18/10/2018 18.16, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: What the world needs (badly) is more browser alternatives. I'm seeing everything converging towards the dystopia where one huge corporation controls the server and the client. We had that, and it wasn't pretty; nowadays with smartphones, always-on, IoT

Re: No Java in Eclipse Preferences

2018-10-18 Thread Francois Papon
Hi, I've used Eclipse in the past (IDEA for now) and Debian is the best OS for Java development for me :) The installation is pretty easy, you just have to download the tarball : https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/packages/ You can choose the pre-package according to your language/usage. The up

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread Ben Finney
Doug writes: > On 10/18/2018 04:49 AM, Reco wrote: > > Palemoon means extremely hostile upstream - [1]. > > > > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > > I would like to know what you mean by "extremely hostile upstream" Reco anticipated your wish to know, and provided a concre

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread Reco
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 07:13:20PM -0400, Doug wrote: > > On 10/18/2018 04:49 AM, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum. > > > > > > > > More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-br

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-18 Thread Dominik George
>> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not shipped with their sources? That also seems like a security nightmare in the making. Mozilla themselves weren't even *that* ridiculous, were they? -nik