Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >Bob Proulx wrote:
> >> The version in Squeeze is 0.6. It is installable on Lenny with no
> >> changes (assuming amd64 or i386) and therefore not eligible for a
> >> backport version.
> >
> >Oh - is that the policy? Pity such packages can't just go straight to
> >ba
In <1291687904.5334.7.ca...@topaz.wgtn.cat-it.co.nz>, Richard Hector wrote:
>On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:16 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> The version in Squeeze is 0.6. It is installable on Lenny with no
>> changes (assuming amd64 or i386) and therefore not eligible for a
>> backport version.
>
>Oh - i
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:16 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> The version in Squeeze is 0.6. It is installable on Lenny with no
> changes (assuming amd64 or i386) and therefore not eligible for a
> backport version.
Oh - is that the policy? Pity such packages can't just go straight to
backports unchang
Thank You very much for Your time and answer, Bob:
> The version in Squeeze is 0.6. It is installable on Lenny with no
> changes (assuming amd64 or i386) and therefore not eligible for a
> backport version.
"It worked like a charm!" :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
Sthu Deus wrote:
> unrecognised tag MTime - you need a newer version of zsync.
> I have stable and backports. There is no newer version than the one I
> have - 0.5-1.
>
> Is there a way I can bypass the problem - or it is a security risk?
The version in Squeeze is 0.6. It is installable on Lenny
Good day.
I have the following problem:
$ /usr/bin/zsync
http://mirror.yandex.ru/ubuntu-cdimage/releases/10.10/release/ubuntu-10.10-dvd-i386.iso.zsync
100.0% 3.2 kBps DONE
unrecognised tag MTime - you need a newer version of zsync.
I have stable and backports. There is no n
6 matches
Mail list logo
